I moved to Mikton for the horse farms and large lots...this density is not acceptable.
T
Tom Kuehn
10 years ago
The CSO as proposed should be denied - it violates the basic premise of one home per acre. The rural aspect of the town is one of the main reasons we moved to Milton 14 years ago.
H
Holly Hunter
10 years ago
No CSO.
M
Michael Chalhoub
10 years ago
We strongly oppose Higher density development in Milton. We specifically chose Milton as our home 10 years ago for its beauty and limits on high density development. Mr. Mayor and City Council please honor our community and the wishes of Milton residents by voting against CSO.
G
Greg Cryan
10 years ago
Please keep to the Milton Master Plan!
J
Jillian Draughon
10 years ago
I am opposed to this ordinance. I am voting NO
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
No CSO!!
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
Cluster homes is not the solution!!
K
Kimberly Robinson
10 years ago
No to the CSO.
P
Paula Cryan
10 years ago
We purchased in Milton over 10 years ago because of the 1 acre per house requirement and to get away from the density. We are very much opposed of anything other than that requirement.
R
Robert Morrison
10 years ago
Will the city council vote to maintain the integrity of Milton or sell out to the developers. City council, put on your big boy pats and vote to limit high density development
K
Kyle Neibert
10 years ago
Please keep this community beauitful by ensuring CSO and any change in density does not happen.
Z
Zachary Bailey
10 years ago
I think that the CSO is incredibly out of context for Milton and will completely counteract the beauty and integrity of the area.
K
Kenneth Viafora
10 years ago
The traffic is already bad enough. Why are we ruining a good thing. Please save Milton
P
Patricia Oswald
10 years ago
I oppose CSO
C
Claire Saunders
10 years ago
No CSO
P
Peter Oswald
10 years ago
I oppose CSO
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
No more new construction neighborhoods!
J
Jeff Dunn
10 years ago
Stop this bill. Conserve milton! The name of this bill is really deceiving... This is pro builder and does not conserve our beatiful city.
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
Traffic is already a lot worse than when we moved here and the CSO will make it much worse. The name itself is so misleading and has certainly fooled people into supporting it. That's a shame.
I moved to Mikton for the horse farms and large lots...this density is not acceptable.
The CSO as proposed should be denied - it violates the basic premise of one home per acre. The rural aspect of the town is one of the main reasons we moved to Milton 14 years ago.
No CSO.
We strongly oppose Higher density development in Milton. We specifically chose Milton as our home 10 years ago for its beauty and limits on high density development. Mr. Mayor and City Council please honor our community and the wishes of Milton residents by voting against CSO.
Please keep to the Milton Master Plan!
I am opposed to this ordinance. I am voting NO
No CSO!!
Cluster homes is not the solution!!
No to the CSO.
We purchased in Milton over 10 years ago because of the 1 acre per house requirement and to get away from the density. We are very much opposed of anything other than that requirement.
Will the city council vote to maintain the integrity of Milton or sell out to the developers. City council, put on your big boy pats and vote to limit high density development
Please keep this community beauitful by ensuring CSO and any change in density does not happen.
I think that the CSO is incredibly out of context for Milton and will completely counteract the beauty and integrity of the area.
The traffic is already bad enough. Why are we ruining a good thing. Please save Milton
I oppose CSO
No CSO
I oppose CSO
No more new construction neighborhoods!
Stop this bill. Conserve milton! The name of this bill is really deceiving... This is pro builder and does not conserve our beatiful city.
Traffic is already a lot worse than when we moved here and the CSO will make it much worse. The name itself is so misleading and has certainly fooled people into supporting it. That's a shame.