Bypassing percolation tests for the benefit of the developer is terrible. The testing and rules are there for a reason; the land will not support higher density.
C
Christopher Chin-Young
10 years ago
No
J
James D. Liakakos
10 years ago
I am opposed to the Milton Conservation Subdivision Ordinance
B
Brian Hayward
10 years ago
I am strongly opposed to the small lot size, and incremental costs that would occur as a result of the approval of this action. Quality of life will erode as well as existing property values, increased traffic, etc.
J
Jim and Rosha Dodson
10 years ago
We vote no.
J
judy dingmann
10 years ago
Having attended several meetings regarding the CSO, I am not confident that this is a good choice for the city of Milton.
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
Please do not aporove this.
S
Susan B Driscoll
10 years ago
Negatives are all I see. I oppose CSO!
R
Rob and Laura Bentley
10 years ago
Way to have our backs Planning Commission. Thanks for voting this down 3 times!!!!!
R
Rosemary Nelson
10 years ago
We chose Milton because of the large lots and "farm-like" feel. We do not want to lose that.
L
Laurin Lausier
10 years ago
Please preserve our beautiful city and vote No to this ordinance. Development in our area has already caused so much congestion and so many other issues (crowding in schools, etc.). We need to preserve our town and really think before we act on these types of proposals how they will effect us for generations! Let's keep Milton rural!
D
Dustin Teverbaugh
10 years ago
We already have too much building.
A
Andrew Klassen
10 years ago
The CSO can suck eggs.
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
I do not want the CSO.
K
Ken Fennell
10 years ago
I am very much opposed to the CSO as it will increase development and make the West side of 400 look like the East side. Milton as it is is something special and I want it to stay that way.
J
Jeff Beals
10 years ago
We need to have zoning that does not allow privatized sewer systems.
C
Cory Schilling
10 years ago
Does not conform to the culture and future of Milton.
J
John Stone
10 years ago
The CSO is a bad for Milton and will increase development.
P
Perry Sprague
10 years ago
I am unable to attend the council meeting since I have to work. I ask the Mayor, Council, Planning Commissioners and City Manager to deny the CSO. Our family moved to Milton 7 years ago. If the above would like to adopt the CSO then they should vote no and move out of the MIlton area to the type of community they prefer. Milton was not a CSO community when they moved into Milton so it should not be one now!
Bypassing percolation tests for the benefit of the developer is terrible. The testing and rules are there for a reason; the land will not support higher density.
No
I am opposed to the Milton Conservation Subdivision Ordinance
I am strongly opposed to the small lot size, and incremental costs that would occur as a result of the approval of this action. Quality of life will erode as well as existing property values, increased traffic, etc.
We vote no.
Having attended several meetings regarding the CSO, I am not confident that this is a good choice for the city of Milton.
Please do not aporove this.
Negatives are all I see. I oppose CSO!
Way to have our backs Planning Commission. Thanks for voting this down 3 times!!!!!
We chose Milton because of the large lots and "farm-like" feel. We do not want to lose that.
Please preserve our beautiful city and vote No to this ordinance. Development in our area has already caused so much congestion and so many other issues (crowding in schools, etc.). We need to preserve our town and really think before we act on these types of proposals how they will effect us for generations! Let's keep Milton rural!
We already have too much building.
The CSO can suck eggs.
I do not want the CSO.
I am very much opposed to the CSO as it will increase development and make the West side of 400 look like the East side. Milton as it is is something special and I want it to stay that way.
We need to have zoning that does not allow privatized sewer systems.
Does not conform to the culture and future of Milton.
The CSO is a bad for Milton and will increase development.
I am unable to attend the council meeting since I have to work. I ask the Mayor, Council, Planning Commissioners and City Manager to deny the CSO. Our family moved to Milton 7 years ago. If the above would like to adopt the CSO then they should vote no and move out of the MIlton area to the type of community they prefer. Milton was not a CSO community when they moved into Milton so it should not be one now!
JUST SAY NO!