I am opposed to the CSO and hope our leaders realize the significant opposition to already difficult traffic congestion and other related community issues.
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
No.
R
Rob Cunnngham
10 years ago
As a long time Six Hills resident and original City of Milton taxpayer, I strongly oppose the MIlton CSO ordinance and believe there can be no long term benefit to permanently degrading our beautiful city's traffic conditions, sense of community pride or rural AE's aesthetics. Passing the Milton CSO would be a penny wise, pound foolish decision. I strongly request that you reject this ordinance.
D
Darin Bartik
10 years ago
Keep Miltons density and uniqueness where it is today!!
M
Monty Johnson
10 years ago
How can any plan that guarantees increased traffic congestion, overcrowding of schools and infringement on individual property owner's rights be good for Milton and its residents?
J
James Powell
10 years ago
I agree wholeheartedly that this is a trojan horse for the high-density housing I am opposed to.
L
Larry Johnstone
10 years ago
Featured
We have lived here 20 years and came here specifically for the Rural life style and small town feel, yes even before it was a city. Protect our bit of paradise or it will turn into Roswell, Alpharetta, or God forbid Sandy Springs or Johns Creek.
V
Vince Pisano
10 years ago
Seems like it's just a tool to increase density.
A
Art Worley
10 years ago
Do not force the CSO on the Milton residents, the majority of whom are completely opposed to this!! I have lived and been a realtor in Milton for 30 years - this is NOT a good idea!
P
Polly Worley
10 years ago
I have lived in Milton for 30 years and am TOTALLY OPPOSED to CSO!! Do the right thing and do what the majority of residents want!!
C
Corena Spiron
10 years ago
As a Milton resident for almost 10 years I am opposed to CSO
N
Natalya Rozenberg
10 years ago
Don't ruin the beautiful nature of rural Milton. If you make the wrong decision now, there won't be any going back later.
N
Nichole Bardelcik
10 years ago
NO CSO!!
J
Joan Wunderle
10 years ago
I am opposed to the CSO because the green space isn't truly green space, community septic poses a risk to the city, will result in more density.
T
Tom Wunderle
10 years ago
I really think this concept is flawed as proposed and will allow development to occur where it should not. It also poses a risk to the city in terms of potential liabilities for drain / septic and other issues.
C
Cindy Furman
10 years ago
Please do not pass the CSO. Protect the milton that we know and love. We are relying on our officials to hear our voice and act on our behalf. Thank you so much.
C
Clint Johnson
10 years ago
Profits of a few should be weighed against the losses of many.
A
Alfredo del Portillo
10 years ago
We purchased in Milton because of the green space and rural nature. Many homes still have septic tanks (if not all) and increasing the density will diminish the appeal of community.
A
Ann Feeney
10 years ago
The proposed CSO is not suitable for Milton. I request denial.
CSO for Milton is a step in the wrong direction.
I am opposed to the CSO and hope our leaders realize the significant opposition to already difficult traffic congestion and other related community issues.
No.
As a long time Six Hills resident and original City of Milton taxpayer, I strongly oppose the MIlton CSO ordinance and believe there can be no long term benefit to permanently degrading our beautiful city's traffic conditions, sense of community pride or rural AE's aesthetics. Passing the Milton CSO would be a penny wise, pound foolish decision. I strongly request that you reject this ordinance.
Keep Miltons density and uniqueness where it is today!!
How can any plan that guarantees increased traffic congestion, overcrowding of schools and infringement on individual property owner's rights be good for Milton and its residents?
I agree wholeheartedly that this is a trojan horse for the high-density housing I am opposed to.
We have lived here 20 years and came here specifically for the Rural life style and small town feel, yes even before it was a city. Protect our bit of paradise or it will turn into Roswell, Alpharetta, or God forbid Sandy Springs or Johns Creek.
Seems like it's just a tool to increase density.
Do not force the CSO on the Milton residents, the majority of whom are completely opposed to this!! I have lived and been a realtor in Milton for 30 years - this is NOT a good idea!
I have lived in Milton for 30 years and am TOTALLY OPPOSED to CSO!! Do the right thing and do what the majority of residents want!!
As a Milton resident for almost 10 years I am opposed to CSO
Don't ruin the beautiful nature of rural Milton. If you make the wrong decision now, there won't be any going back later.
NO CSO!!
I am opposed to the CSO because the green space isn't truly green space, community septic poses a risk to the city, will result in more density.
I really think this concept is flawed as proposed and will allow development to occur where it should not. It also poses a risk to the city in terms of potential liabilities for drain / septic and other issues.
Please do not pass the CSO. Protect the milton that we know and love. We are relying on our officials to hear our voice and act on our behalf. Thank you so much.
Profits of a few should be weighed against the losses of many.
We purchased in Milton because of the green space and rural nature. Many homes still have septic tanks (if not all) and increasing the density will diminish the appeal of community.
The proposed CSO is not suitable for Milton. I request denial.