Say NO to Euro link 5 industrial estate on the entrance to the estate
207 Comments
D
David Mooney
9 years ago
Completely mugged the owners off, they deserve what they told they would get and now compensation
T
Tracy Daisy
9 years ago
Knock on effect in area will be horrendous! Already too many lorries!
L
Lindsay Roberts
9 years ago
This isn't fair - we need homes, not houses on an industrial estate. Children need fresh air and places to play on their doorsteps.
A
Anonymous
9 years ago
I moved here having been told that we would get a school, shop and Drs surgery which was ideal as we were starting a family. These have been empty promises and we are now contemplating moving so we have these facilities close by for our family.
T
Tony Clark
9 years ago
The industrial estate would be too close to the residential area of Great Easthall.
M
Mick Leivers
9 years ago
No to Eurolink V.
N
Nadine
9 years ago
Strongly object to Eurolink 5
M
mark grover
9 years ago
i object to eurolink 5
P
Peter Kingston
9 years ago
All the reasons have slready been voiced
K
Kerry m
9 years ago
No we do not need anymore eurolinks here its already got enough in the one now I like seeing the countryside and paid for that and now they want to ruin it.
S
Samantha Clark
9 years ago
Do not want this at all, it will de value the price of the houses and it's not a nice place to bring up kids
G
Gareth Harvey
9 years ago
I object to Eurolink V on the grounds that it will be built on open countryside next to a new housing estate. I believe it will cause traffic issues and will be a major source of air, light and noise polution, affecting the thousands of residents living next to it at Great Easthall.
L
Lee Stelfox
9 years ago
This is Kents newest village according to the brochure that I got when I moved in 10 years ago! More like a village that has no amenities and is on and industrial estate. Typical SBC and in their own words as Onwas at the last planning meeting, "we've let the residents down on this estate" do the right thing and reject this proposal.
N
Nigel tindall
9 years ago
This is so wrong. Our children will lose so much equity. This is totally wrong and immoral.
A
Alison tindall
9 years ago
You cannottdo this . Our children have sunk thousands into their new house and you are going to wipe out any value.
C
Charlene McKenna
9 years ago
Right on peoples door steps they have enough units around them all ready
T
Tony Fowler
9 years ago
I'm very much against the expansion of Eurolink due to the impact to the environment and my child's health by diesel exhaust fumes from lorries.
D
Dan Essen
9 years ago
Building this huge industrial estate on our doorsteps would be nothing short of catastrophic, don't let this happen!!!
E
Erika Larsson
9 years ago
I strongly object to the Eurolink 5 development
P
Peter Burleigh
9 years ago
I reject the planning permission on the grounds of ruining our village environmentally and aesthetically.
Completely mugged the owners off, they deserve what they told they would get and now compensation
Knock on effect in area will be horrendous! Already too many lorries!
This isn't fair - we need homes, not houses on an industrial estate. Children need fresh air and places to play on their doorsteps.
I moved here having been told that we would get a school, shop and Drs surgery which was ideal as we were starting a family. These have been empty promises and we are now contemplating moving so we have these facilities close by for our family.
The industrial estate would be too close to the residential area of Great Easthall.
No to Eurolink V.
Strongly object to Eurolink 5
i object to eurolink 5
All the reasons have slready been voiced
No we do not need anymore eurolinks here its already got enough in the one now I like seeing the countryside and paid for that and now they want to ruin it.
Do not want this at all, it will de value the price of the houses and it's not a nice place to bring up kids
I object to Eurolink V on the grounds that it will be built on open countryside next to a new housing estate. I believe it will cause traffic issues and will be a major source of air, light and noise polution, affecting the thousands of residents living next to it at Great Easthall.
This is Kents newest village according to the brochure that I got when I moved in 10 years ago! More like a village that has no amenities and is on and industrial estate. Typical SBC and in their own words as Onwas at the last planning meeting, "we've let the residents down on this estate" do the right thing and reject this proposal.
This is so wrong. Our children will lose so much equity. This is totally wrong and immoral.
You cannottdo this . Our children have sunk thousands into their new house and you are going to wipe out any value.
Right on peoples door steps they have enough units around them all ready
I'm very much against the expansion of Eurolink due to the impact to the environment and my child's health by diesel exhaust fumes from lorries.
Building this huge industrial estate on our doorsteps would be nothing short of catastrophic, don't let this happen!!!
I strongly object to the Eurolink 5 development
I reject the planning permission on the grounds of ruining our village environmentally and aesthetically.