Say NO to 500 Homes at Seige Cross Development Thatcham
101 Comments
A
Alison Bint
12 years ago
Our public services are stretched over their limits as it is now so what will another 500 homes do to all this, local children travelling miles to get to another school not in their town, waiting a month to see a doctor, this plan needs to be reconsider as not viable as it is!!!
J
Joanne Gale
12 years ago
Totally oppose this development. Kennet Heath was only supposed to be 500, never trust what the developers promise. I applaud you for doing this Stuart.
D
dagmira humphrey
12 years ago
not enough schools places. gp surgeries are already overstreached
S
Susan Phillips
12 years ago
schools, doctors and dentists all ready crowded
M
Marc Rogers
12 years ago
Thatcham is already struggling to provide adequate resources for its current population density. As a result it is already incredibly difficult to get access to community facilities from medical appointments through to school places and in some cases residents are forced to travel for miles to seek facilities in neighboring areas. The addition of 500 additional densely built residences without any investment in the infrastructure that will be needed to support those new families would be a disaster. Instead of managing developments like these for maximum profit, packing in as many houses as possible, we should be building for sustainability and quality of life.
A
Anonymous
12 years ago
Too many houses in Thatcham already with too little facilities such as schools, Surgeries and shops. Such a poor decision !!
S
steve eggleton
12 years ago
we dont want anymore homes on this small bit of greenbelt, we have got enough already
A
Anita Kent
12 years ago
No more development
S
simon Gale
12 years ago
Surface water flooding issues historically. Where will the water from this area go?
E
Emma Willcock
12 years ago
, also include schooling, medical centres and amenitiesthat are already oversubscribed in Thatcham.
P
Paula Gilbert
12 years ago
No more homes
A
Anonymous
12 years ago
Thatcham does not need 500 extra homes.
K
Katie
12 years ago
There are plenty more development sites about and this certainly shouldn't be one, think of the wild life, the flooding (this field floods), the access, it is just an absolute nightmare and extremely crazy!
A
Anonymous
12 years ago
crazy
A
Amanda lush
12 years ago
No!
A
Anonymous
12 years ago
Absolutely not!!!! Thatcham does not have the infrastructure to cope with a development of this size!
M
Maria Titchener
12 years ago
No way,no more in Thatcham,there are more living here then in Newbury
T
Tanya Cullen
12 years ago
Thatcham has not the infrastructure for more development. It's becoming a barrack town. This is unacceptable in my eyes. They would be the size of shoe boxes & cost too much. Worthless!
N
nick lucas
12 years ago
No, this is beyond a joke
K
Karen Morgan
12 years ago
If the councils hadn't sold off all the properties to developers and private landlords there would be enough houses
Our public services are stretched over their limits as it is now so what will another 500 homes do to all this, local children travelling miles to get to another school not in their town, waiting a month to see a doctor, this plan needs to be reconsider as not viable as it is!!!
Totally oppose this development. Kennet Heath was only supposed to be 500, never trust what the developers promise. I applaud you for doing this Stuart.
not enough schools places. gp surgeries are already overstreached
schools, doctors and dentists all ready crowded
Thatcham is already struggling to provide adequate resources for its current population density. As a result it is already incredibly difficult to get access to community facilities from medical appointments through to school places and in some cases residents are forced to travel for miles to seek facilities in neighboring areas. The addition of 500 additional densely built residences without any investment in the infrastructure that will be needed to support those new families would be a disaster. Instead of managing developments like these for maximum profit, packing in as many houses as possible, we should be building for sustainability and quality of life.
Too many houses in Thatcham already with too little facilities such as schools, Surgeries and shops. Such a poor decision !!
we dont want anymore homes on this small bit of greenbelt, we have got enough already
No more development
Surface water flooding issues historically. Where will the water from this area go?
, also include schooling, medical centres and amenitiesthat are already oversubscribed in Thatcham.
No more homes
Thatcham does not need 500 extra homes.
There are plenty more development sites about and this certainly shouldn't be one, think of the wild life, the flooding (this field floods), the access, it is just an absolute nightmare and extremely crazy!
crazy
No!
Absolutely not!!!! Thatcham does not have the infrastructure to cope with a development of this size!
No way,no more in Thatcham,there are more living here then in Newbury
Thatcham has not the infrastructure for more development. It's becoming a barrack town. This is unacceptable in my eyes. They would be the size of shoe boxes & cost too much. Worthless!
No, this is beyond a joke
If the councils hadn't sold off all the properties to developers and private landlords there would be enough houses