wot harm R they doing ? wil do - let them go ... A.S.A.P.
D
Dianne Mckenzie
12 years ago
Please just remove the Dear
A
Agnes McMillan
12 years ago
Sellafield is a big corporation, the people who runit needto show some compassion. No need to kill defenseless animals.
G
G McNamara
12 years ago
You isolated them from their population, open the fence and set them free to rejoin it!
M
matt ellis
12 years ago
To "cull" these animals would be morally wrong and without any justification whatsoever when there are perfectly viable alternatives.
S
Sarah Banks
12 years ago
Cruel and unnecessary.
A
Anonymous
12 years ago
Please give this herd of deer the chance of life. There are other means of solving the problem without killing them
S
S.Thomas
12 years ago
Don't destroy this valuable wildlife when there's a simple alternative - set them free to live in the wild.
L
Liz Thomas
12 years ago
Set them free, there's no need to kill the deer - let them go.
B
Brenda Parsons
12 years ago
The bosses of Sellafield have had a cavalier attitude to the wildlife on their site
L
Lynn Trussell
12 years ago
Take the fence down and let them out
M
Malcolm Craik
12 years ago
If they can't stop deer getting in it says much about the state of security at our local nuclear dustbin.
J
Jan Yarker
12 years ago
and move them to safety, Shame on you!!!
A
Anonymous
12 years ago
I know these deer can be saved, just do it Sellafield & stop being complete bastards about it
D
David Simpson
12 years ago
To kill is NOT humane - to release them to freedom is.
A
Anonymous
12 years ago
barbaric, no need for this senseless slaughter
F
F.Ellis
12 years ago
The slaughter of defenseless wild animals is criminal.
M
M JOHNSTONE
12 years ago
ABSOLUTELY SENSELESS AND OURAGEOUS. YOU WISH TO KILL THESE ANIMALS WHO ARE NOW AN INCONVENIENCE BECAUSE OF YOUR ACTIONS. YOU AND THE DiP SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF YOURSELVES. DO THE RIGHT THING HERE, NOT THE MOST CONVENIENT FOR YOU.
M
Martin P
12 years ago
“This decision therefore has been taken with the medium- to long-term welfare of the animals in mind" - I'm glad these people aren't looking after my welfare!
E
Elizabeth Boardman
12 years ago
"most humane and practical course of action" utter nonsense, Sellafield should be ashamed
wot harm R they doing ? wil do - let them go ... A.S.A.P.
Please just remove the Dear
Sellafield is a big corporation, the people who runit needto show some compassion. No need to kill defenseless animals.
You isolated them from their population, open the fence and set them free to rejoin it!
To "cull" these animals would be morally wrong and without any justification whatsoever when there are perfectly viable alternatives.
Cruel and unnecessary.
Please give this herd of deer the chance of life. There are other means of solving the problem without killing them
Don't destroy this valuable wildlife when there's a simple alternative - set them free to live in the wild.
Set them free, there's no need to kill the deer - let them go.
The bosses of Sellafield have had a cavalier attitude to the wildlife on their site
Take the fence down and let them out
If they can't stop deer getting in it says much about the state of security at our local nuclear dustbin.
and move them to safety, Shame on you!!!
I know these deer can be saved, just do it Sellafield & stop being complete bastards about it
To kill is NOT humane - to release them to freedom is.
barbaric, no need for this senseless slaughter
The slaughter of defenseless wild animals is criminal.
ABSOLUTELY SENSELESS AND OURAGEOUS. YOU WISH TO KILL THESE ANIMALS WHO ARE NOW AN INCONVENIENCE BECAUSE OF YOUR ACTIONS. YOU AND THE DiP SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF YOURSELVES. DO THE RIGHT THING HERE, NOT THE MOST CONVENIENT FOR YOU.
“This decision therefore has been taken with the medium- to long-term welfare of the animals in mind" - I'm glad these people aren't looking after my welfare!
"most humane and practical course of action" utter nonsense, Sellafield should be ashamed