I am no Nazi, but to destroy the Eagle is idiotic and destroying it would be destroying history and a slap in the face to both the British and German sailors of the battle. It should not be destroyed, maybe put on display as a memorial to the sailors.
E
Ed Torockio
2 years ago
History is bloody, its full of horrors, atrocities, and even genocide. History isnt just full of valor, honor, peace, and exploration. Dont censor history. Because if you censor history you cant learn from it. This belongs in a museum and the sailors who sailed on the Admiral Graf Spee should be honored as sailors. You are not honoring them if you destroy or censor history because it is uncomfortable.
M
Mihailo Mitrović
2 years ago
History must be preserved not desecrated for politics.
A
Anonymous
2 years ago
History should not be destroyed
S
Sam
2 years ago
histroy should not be cancelled or censored
M
Major Powell
2 years ago
If we are to shun and destroy history, regardless of which side it was on, we are hardly better than those we beat. As such, the eagle should be saved.
F
Fabian
2 years ago
This idea of justifying the destruction of historical artifacts must be abolished. So much has been lost to zealotry, prejudice, and ignorance. How much more must be destroyed to appease such foolishness? How much of our history must be lost and stolen from future generations due to emotional grievances. No more, I say!
V
Vishnu
2 years ago
Featured
This Eagle should be save at all cost history shouldn't be censored. Genghis Khan killed so many people still we have his statue in Mongolia there are many people who committed war crimes still we have their statues. Give that to a museum or it you couldn't just place it back at the bottom of sea floor from where it was picked.
J
Jami
2 years ago
...
L
Lucas Roderick
2 years ago
History shouldn´t be censored.
The eagle deserves to be in a museum.
A
Anmolpandita
2 years ago
The eagle will rise again.
B
Bobby Hughes
2 years ago
save the eagle
A
Arlo
2 years ago
Save it, This is Fit!
W
William Miranda
2 years ago
Featured
I live in Uruguay. The history of the "Graf Spee" isn't talked a lot in here and the history matter. I like World War 2 and I condem the actions of the Nazi's but the Eagle of the Graf Spee is a fundamental part of history and for Uruguay. It should be in a museum as any other "artefact".
J
john doe
2 years ago
save it!
K
Ken Attwood
2 years ago
History has to be studied and understood, if not it will be repeated. History cannot be studdied if it is rewriten and sanitised. History cannot be studied if artifacts are destroyed mindlessly.
N
Nicholas Christman
2 years ago
Choose to preserve history instead of baseless destruction or alteration.
R
Robert Hennigan
2 years ago
History should be preserved in a museum, not destroyed!
A
Alessandro Marazzi
2 years ago
It should be piuttosto in a mesuem like alla the historical thinks
M
Marcello Cappellari
2 years ago
This eagle should be put in a museum. Not only because it's an historical symbol, but also for showing that the war does not have meanings.
I am no Nazi, but to destroy the Eagle is idiotic and destroying it would be destroying history and a slap in the face to both the British and German sailors of the battle. It should not be destroyed, maybe put on display as a memorial to the sailors.
History is bloody, its full of horrors, atrocities, and even genocide. History isnt just full of valor, honor, peace, and exploration. Dont censor history. Because if you censor history you cant learn from it. This belongs in a museum and the sailors who sailed on the Admiral Graf Spee should be honored as sailors. You are not honoring them if you destroy or censor history because it is uncomfortable.
History must be preserved not desecrated for politics.
History should not be destroyed
histroy should not be cancelled or censored
If we are to shun and destroy history, regardless of which side it was on, we are hardly better than those we beat. As such, the eagle should be saved.
This idea of justifying the destruction of historical artifacts must be abolished. So much has been lost to zealotry, prejudice, and ignorance. How much more must be destroyed to appease such foolishness? How much of our history must be lost and stolen from future generations due to emotional grievances. No more, I say!
This Eagle should be save at all cost history shouldn't be censored. Genghis Khan killed so many people still we have his statue in Mongolia there are many people who committed war crimes still we have their statues. Give that to a museum or it you couldn't just place it back at the bottom of sea floor from where it was picked.
...
History shouldn´t be censored. The eagle deserves to be in a museum.
The eagle will rise again.
save the eagle
Save it, This is Fit!
I live in Uruguay. The history of the "Graf Spee" isn't talked a lot in here and the history matter. I like World War 2 and I condem the actions of the Nazi's but the Eagle of the Graf Spee is a fundamental part of history and for Uruguay. It should be in a museum as any other "artefact".
save it!
History has to be studied and understood, if not it will be repeated. History cannot be studdied if it is rewriten and sanitised. History cannot be studied if artifacts are destroyed mindlessly.
Choose to preserve history instead of baseless destruction or alteration.
History should be preserved in a museum, not destroyed!
It should be piuttosto in a mesuem like alla the historical thinks
This eagle should be put in a museum. Not only because it's an historical symbol, but also for showing that the war does not have meanings.