Skip to main content

The Board of Supervisors finally backed down and abandoned the demolition plans for our original LACMA campus. We forced them to respect our architectural history instead of treating Pereira’s legacy like trash. Stay vigilant because we must ensure they actually pour that money into restoration rather than trying to pull …

November 16, 2013

Save and RESTORE the Original LACMA Campus!

Save and RESTORE the Original LACMA Campus!

🏆 Won — 424 supporters Verified

Final supporters

C
Charles C.
H
Heidi B.
T
Trevor G.
A
Anthony E.
T
Thomas E.
M
Morgan S.
D
Dorota B.
T
Taylor B.
J
Joe V.
K
Kim O.
+414 more
SP
Started by Steven Price 13 years, 1 month ago
SAVE HISTORIC, ORIGINAL LACMA! We the undersigned stand opposed to the Los Angeles County Museum of Art (LACMA) plan, which would demolish the original 1965 campus, designed by celebrated LA Modernist architect William Pereira, to make way for an entirely new facility. Scrapping a beloved building from the landscape and replacing it with another is not a revolutionary concept, nor a futuristic one. It is borne out of the belief that LACMA donor money is limitless, the past is disposable, and our civic heroes are irrelevant. THIS IS CHANGE FOR THE SAKE OF CHANGE. IT’S EXPENSIVE, IT’S WASTEFUL AND IT’S WRONG. Let the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors know that you are watching the events unfold and you say “no!” Show you appreciate the richness of our architectural heritage, support the modern ideals of preservation, fiscal responsibility and sensitive retrofitting to maintain a green structure into the future. FOUR SIMPLE REASONS: 1. Our shared architectural heritage William Pereira was an LA-based architect, responsible for over 250 buildings and master plans, including the Theme Building at LAX, TSan Francisco's TransAmerica Pyramid, UC Irvine, USC, Occidental, the Pepperdine campus, JPL, and more. He is regarded as one of the foremost proponents of cast-concrete forms, with a futuristic look that pays tribute to the visions of LA as the city of the future. 2. Sustainablility. The reuse of Modern resources is a sustainable practice, and unlike demolition, keeps buildings intact and out of landfill. Around the world, older buildings – indeed centuries old buildings – have been sensitively retrofitted to accommodate newer environmental standards. Why is LACMA unwilling to keep the Pereria buildings intact and out of landfill? 3. Fiscal responsibility. Donor money should go toward art acquisition and member events instead of frivolous and expensive architectural explorations. 4. Our children, the donors of the future. This is our opportunity to tell them: “We valued your heritage and we preserved it for you.” Please add your name to the list of urban planners, architectural historians, preservation organizations, LACMA museum members and proud citizens of Southern California who decry the notion that the current LACMA buildings designed by Los Angeles architect William Pereria in 1965 are merely fodder for a landfill. At a time when his architecture is the centerpiece of museum shows and landmarking in other municipalities, this is NOT the time to be reducing one of his major structures to rubble!

Updates

Reached 250 supporters

September 1, 2013

July 25, 2013

We just hit 100 signatures and the suits at LACMA will not be able to ignore this for much longer. They think our history is just trash to be cleared away for their vanity project. We are going to keep fighting until they realize this destruction is unacceptable.

Reached 100 supporters

July 25, 2013

July 22, 2013

The LACMA board thinks they can tear down our history without anyone noticing. We are closing in on 100 signatures so get this link to everyone you know right now to stop their demolition plans.

18 Comments

M
Morgan Sykes Jaybush
10 years ago Featured

It's amazing that an institution based on the History of Art places no value on the History of Architecture.

J
Joe Varneke
10 years ago Featured

It's a shame there's a desire by some to tear down this history. I worked there throughout the 90's & have great memories of this place. The feel of being in the open plaza is refreshing. Do not tear these down simply for the sake of change. One thing I've learned in life is that change is not always synonymous with progress.

T
Tony Villanueva
11 years ago Featured

What would Europe be like if they had not preserved their architecture. Why does Los Angeles have to tear down EVERTHING?

W
William Pereira
12 years ago Featured

The Zumthor tar... "blot" (I can scarcely think of an apt descriptive) will blight the area of Wilshire and destroy the Mid Century Modern "feel" of the Miracle Mile. This isn't me saying "protect MY building" - it's me saying "please protect Los Angeles' heritage." If NOTHING else pick something elegantly modern - not bombastically recapitulating a stupid tar pit. No one in the world thinks of "tarpit" when they think of Los Angeles. Please please please think of the big picture and don't let this abomination occur. thank you, William Pereira

T
Todd Bianco
12 years ago Featured

The more I look at old pictures of the original design, the more I'm struck by its beauty. LA would be best served by undoing the hideous graft-on structures and restoring the original buildings, including atriums and water features. Please don't destroy our heritage!

A
Andrew Gage
12 years ago Featured

How ironic that the director of the Los Angeles County Museum of Art has so little appreciation and regard for the design and history of "his" museum. Apparently Michael Govan is NOT the man best suited for the job if he can even entertain the idea of demolishing Pereira's campus when such an action is not needed and irresponsible. It's like handing the museum's Picasso collection to another artist to paint something of his design over them. Advice for Mr. Govan: Do something highly non-LA in nature - RESPECT that which is already there.

T
Trevor Griffey
10 years ago

Opposed to the wasteful spending, as a LACMA member.

S
Stephanie Shaffer
10 years ago

Buildings do not have to be young to be beautiful.