The loss of rural land is contributing to a loss of community cohesion as well as over utilization of an already lacking infrastructure.
S
Sarah
4 months ago
I respectfully request that the zoning hold remain in place. Our community deserves the same level of thoughtful planning and long-range consideration that areas like West Knoxville received before major development was approved. Rushing this process risks creating long-term issues that could be avoided with proper evaluation, infrastructure planning, and genuine community input.
We are simply asking for patience and the chance to ensure that growth is done responsibly, sustainably, and in a way that protects the character and safety of our area. Waiting now will prevent bigger problems later.
Thank you for your attention and commitment to making decisions that support the best interests of our community.
M
Misty Sprinkle
4 months ago
The area around the proposed development does not need apartments. Put houses if you have to do something!
A
Ann Smith
4 months ago
Our roads & schools can not support all these new developments coming in.
B
Breanne Anderson
4 months ago
Please stop developing this area. It's awful. Rural is not for endless expanse.
B
Brittany Benziger
4 months ago
I’m am voting NO to the proposed development.
M
Mark Norton
4 months ago
The county can’t even keep up with the recycling area now! Where is all the money going to for these permits to build? Why do we have to build more housing? What is county doing with all this money? I’m sure no one will answer that!
A
Anthony Canada
4 months ago
Stop buying farms and putting cheap houses on them!
M
Marian Ottenberg
4 months ago
The infrastructure will not support 194 dwellings. Pleasant Hill Rd is not wide enough to accommodate the amount of traffic this would create plus since is so close to Carter HS this road is used for kids walking to school. Additionally, there is a natural spring on the property that run off would be contaminated affecting properties that are down from the proposed development site.
M
Merle Ottenberg
4 months ago
The infrastructure will not support 194 dwellings. Pleasant Hill Rd is not wide enough to accommodate the amount of traffic this would create plus since is so close to Carter HS this road is used for kids walking to school. Additionally, there is a natural spring on the property that run off would be contaminated affecting properties that are down from the proposed development site.
J
Jessica B
4 months ago
No!!!
C
Chris Howard
4 months ago
This is unacceptable. The developer has the potential to build 194 apartments on 16 acres.
This is getting out of hand
QUIT ALREADY!!
The loss of rural land is contributing to a loss of community cohesion as well as over utilization of an already lacking infrastructure.
I respectfully request that the zoning hold remain in place. Our community deserves the same level of thoughtful planning and long-range consideration that areas like West Knoxville received before major development was approved. Rushing this process risks creating long-term issues that could be avoided with proper evaluation, infrastructure planning, and genuine community input. We are simply asking for patience and the chance to ensure that growth is done responsibly, sustainably, and in a way that protects the character and safety of our area. Waiting now will prevent bigger problems later. Thank you for your attention and commitment to making decisions that support the best interests of our community.
The area around the proposed development does not need apartments. Put houses if you have to do something!
Our roads & schools can not support all these new developments coming in.
Please stop developing this area. It's awful. Rural is not for endless expanse.
I’m am voting NO to the proposed development.
The county can’t even keep up with the recycling area now! Where is all the money going to for these permits to build? Why do we have to build more housing? What is county doing with all this money? I’m sure no one will answer that!
Stop buying farms and putting cheap houses on them!
The infrastructure will not support 194 dwellings. Pleasant Hill Rd is not wide enough to accommodate the amount of traffic this would create plus since is so close to Carter HS this road is used for kids walking to school. Additionally, there is a natural spring on the property that run off would be contaminated affecting properties that are down from the proposed development site.
The infrastructure will not support 194 dwellings. Pleasant Hill Rd is not wide enough to accommodate the amount of traffic this would create plus since is so close to Carter HS this road is used for kids walking to school. Additionally, there is a natural spring on the property that run off would be contaminated affecting properties that are down from the proposed development site.
No!!!
This is unacceptable. The developer has the potential to build 194 apartments on 16 acres.