Skip to main content

SAVE DeWitt Park

228 Comments

P
Penelope Roling
2 years ago

Clinton needs this but not at this location!

L
Laura Rose
2 years ago

Absolutely not!!!!

M
Mark S Vulich
2 years ago

I do not feel this facility should be located in the Downtown SSMID District. I felt the original location was OK. I can’t imagine what senior will want to live in Park Towers and what working class individual will want to live in our Roosevelt housing. The Downtown has been working hard to improve the appearance and safety of the area. The proposed facility will not improve the Downtown’s image or safety in the eyes of people visiting the area.

S
Sue Kampe
2 years ago

Why don't you build it on Main St. , down by the river. No one uses that land, and it's not near any child care building.

C
Cindy Ugarph
2 years ago

The hypocrisy and asininery is ridiculous! Clinton wants to attract new businesses, revitalize the downtown, grow our tax base, so we do it by inviting homeless? This will just increase the number of homeless because of the lack of rules or any responsibility. As soon as word of mouth gets out, the influx will start. And what about, not only the obvious of the elderly and children in the vicinity, the new businesses and upscale apartments located in the downtown? Who would want to rent or do business when there is a homeless building? Has anyone considered the downtown businesses? How do you revitalize when no one wants to come? And who is going to maintain when the funds are spent? There are plenty of vacant buildings that could be considered. In other words, Clinton residents, your safety and welfare play second fiddle to people who have no interest in our city, except for the free ride.

L
Laura Finn
2 years ago

It’s a very nice green space. Other places for shelter can be used.

D
Dakota Mitchell
2 years ago

This is just crazy that they would even consider this

M
mary nolan
2 years ago

WHO IN THE WORLD WOULD EVEN SUGGEST THAT PARCEL OF LAND!!!

L
Lilly Wisely
2 years ago

We already have a problem in that area! Why would we cause more? And why would we build next to a children’s center and in a park?

D
Desiree Hunt
2 years ago

This is NOT a good idea for our community. Move it and change the rules.

C
Carol McClintock
2 years ago

SAVE OUR PARKS..!!!

A
Andrea Anderson
2 years ago

1-Before selling any city property for housing projects, the authorities in Clinton should be educated on the difference between affordable housing and low income housing. 2-the safety of the seniors living on the premises should be paramount.

K
Kenny Lind
2 years ago

We NEED to preserve more of Clinton's history!

D
Debra
2 years ago Featured

I know we do have a need for this property to be built , but this is not the proper location for such a place. The old Lyons middle school or the LaFayette Apartments are both more suited for a project like this.

J
Judy Kuehl
2 years ago

Do not sell the park!!!!!

P
Pam Wisor
2 years ago

We need green space in town! Too much gets torn down, excavated and/or left in ruin. We need to use what exists, not ruin green space.

T
Tara Saladin
2 years ago

To build a brand new building, destroying a park with beautiful trees for the elderly so that a bunch of drug users and pedophiles is outrageous and disgraceful. Use that money for something better. It's not going to help them become successful it's would just be a place where they will continue to use and take advantage.

R
Ron Coder-Lawrence
2 years ago

why not build the new building on 2nd Avenue North where the city has cleared out the homes???

R
Rob miltenberger
2 years ago

How about using the Lafayette building?

A
Anonymous
2 years ago

We should not be removing parks, this potential housing project could go in many places… maybe where the buildings were torn down across from hyvee.