No more development. I bought here recently because of the way it is now .500 more homes and at least 2 people andcars in each house? Stupid and unsafe! No!Wendy
M
Michael Khoi
9 years ago
Safety of the community needs to come before profits base on development
A
Anonymous
9 years ago
While the need for more housing in San Diego is great-- this particular area's safety concerns need to be better addressed. What they have so far is not enough. Also, in addition to neighborhood access, Carmel mountain road/freeway entrance will definitely be impacted by the new residents of this plan and the one of pq village redevelopment.
A
Andrew medley
9 years ago
No more development on this double tree golf coarse
A
Anonymous
9 years ago
Don't overdevelope this great community!
T
Thomas Davidson
9 years ago
open space is precious. There should be a compromise that includes some development and a great deal of open space.
D
Dan Cicchelli
9 years ago
Closure of the golf course was a terribly sad setback for this great community. The designated open space provides a buffer from an ever expanding I-15. Building homes will permanently destroy the intention and design of this unique community, as well as pose a huge risk to the safety of the current residents. If the City allows future development, my neighbors and I will vigorously fight for preserving massive open space and huge open space buffers adjacent to existing Glens homes. The preliminary Juniper design fails to provide anything close to enough open space to satisfy our concerns. BTW, open space with an overlay public easement-- but maintained by an HOA-- does NOT work. There comes a day when the HOA is underfunded and the first things to get less funding are the public easements. Why would home owners of a new development want to pay to pick up the trash I leave in "public" trash cans? City maintained is the ONLY long term solution.
L
l.l.noia
9 years ago
Growth has outpaced the capacity of the environment
This is what was said about Houston in the wake of the recent disaster. Lets stop the madness of outpacing the capacity of the environment. That's what this project will do.
A
Anonymous
9 years ago
For safety reasons, I am opposed to the proposed development.
H
Howard and Susie Labow
9 years ago
This project sounds similar to the monstrosity built at Mira Mesa Blvd & I-15 (Casa Mira View). We strongly oppose this dense project in our neighborhood.
A
Alisa Atkins
9 years ago
I am very concerned with the single access lane in and out of this neighborhood. Adding even more homes to reply on this exhisting one lane access road is far too dangerous for all residents in the Rolling Hills area. The new homes builder should build an access road that does not additionally burden Penasquitos Drive. Perhaps linking up with the southbound Carmel Mtn. road freeway exit with access for the neighborhood to use as an additional exit would benefit all.
J
Joy Jacobs
9 years ago
Unless full disclosure is done by 33 North and they are as transparent as they claim, while working with the community prior to development, I don't support this at all. I'm already seeing questionable issues raised in first few months of this process.
O
Olivia Malmstrom
9 years ago
Featured
My concerns are: fire evacuation, pedestrian safety, and losing a beautiful open space that has been a part of the RP community for fifty years. Redevelop existing areas to be higher density when there is sufficient support infrastructure; don't destroy open spaces for more suburban sprawl.
D
Debora A Chlad
9 years ago
Please leave the Double Tree golf course as open land for the gain of the community.
A
Anonymous
9 years ago
People in this community moved here for the current neighborhoods in place. Adding 1,500 plus living units with degrade our living conditions. I am strongly against and new development on the Double Tree property!!!!
M
Mike Gentry
9 years ago
Hello,
I would like to express the many concerns that a new housing development in the Rolling Hills area would bring. The increase flow of traffic, the responding of green space, the restructuring of roads to meet new demands, safety of all residence in an emergency situation, the unnecessary building of domiciles that would use up more resources (water) that San Diego can not spare and the affect on some homes value.
Thank you,
Mike Gentry
Concerned Citizen
J
Jon Pak
9 years ago
Keep open space as open space, how it's always been mean to be.
I've survived wild fires in the neighborhood and it was already a nightmare to evacuate. Very dangerous to add more houses
L
Lorraine Arnold
9 years ago
I am very highly against the development of the doubletree golf course
As a long time resident who has experienced numerous evacuations, I have significant concerns regarding the proposed development of the former Doubletree Golf Course. The proposal for a new road would still create a bottleneck leaving the community on a daily basis, and would be a public hazard in the event of an evacuation. The new proposed homes would reduce property value of those that have had green space views, and despite the proposal of making a 55+ community, the population impact on the local schools (which are already at max capacity) would be increased.
No more development. I bought here recently because of the way it is now .500 more homes and at least 2 people andcars in each house? Stupid and unsafe! No!Wendy
Safety of the community needs to come before profits base on development
While the need for more housing in San Diego is great-- this particular area's safety concerns need to be better addressed. What they have so far is not enough. Also, in addition to neighborhood access, Carmel mountain road/freeway entrance will definitely be impacted by the new residents of this plan and the one of pq village redevelopment.
No more development on this double tree golf coarse
Don't overdevelope this great community!
open space is precious. There should be a compromise that includes some development and a great deal of open space.
Closure of the golf course was a terribly sad setback for this great community. The designated open space provides a buffer from an ever expanding I-15. Building homes will permanently destroy the intention and design of this unique community, as well as pose a huge risk to the safety of the current residents. If the City allows future development, my neighbors and I will vigorously fight for preserving massive open space and huge open space buffers adjacent to existing Glens homes. The preliminary Juniper design fails to provide anything close to enough open space to satisfy our concerns. BTW, open space with an overlay public easement-- but maintained by an HOA-- does NOT work. There comes a day when the HOA is underfunded and the first things to get less funding are the public easements. Why would home owners of a new development want to pay to pick up the trash I leave in "public" trash cans? City maintained is the ONLY long term solution.
Growth has outpaced the capacity of the environment This is what was said about Houston in the wake of the recent disaster. Lets stop the madness of outpacing the capacity of the environment. That's what this project will do.
For safety reasons, I am opposed to the proposed development.
This project sounds similar to the monstrosity built at Mira Mesa Blvd & I-15 (Casa Mira View). We strongly oppose this dense project in our neighborhood.
I am very concerned with the single access lane in and out of this neighborhood. Adding even more homes to reply on this exhisting one lane access road is far too dangerous for all residents in the Rolling Hills area. The new homes builder should build an access road that does not additionally burden Penasquitos Drive. Perhaps linking up with the southbound Carmel Mtn. road freeway exit with access for the neighborhood to use as an additional exit would benefit all.
Unless full disclosure is done by 33 North and they are as transparent as they claim, while working with the community prior to development, I don't support this at all. I'm already seeing questionable issues raised in first few months of this process.
My concerns are: fire evacuation, pedestrian safety, and losing a beautiful open space that has been a part of the RP community for fifty years. Redevelop existing areas to be higher density when there is sufficient support infrastructure; don't destroy open spaces for more suburban sprawl.
Please leave the Double Tree golf course as open land for the gain of the community.
People in this community moved here for the current neighborhoods in place. Adding 1,500 plus living units with degrade our living conditions. I am strongly against and new development on the Double Tree property!!!!
Hello, I would like to express the many concerns that a new housing development in the Rolling Hills area would bring. The increase flow of traffic, the responding of green space, the restructuring of roads to meet new demands, safety of all residence in an emergency situation, the unnecessary building of domiciles that would use up more resources (water) that San Diego can not spare and the affect on some homes value. Thank you, Mike Gentry Concerned Citizen
Keep open space as open space, how it's always been mean to be. I've survived wild fires in the neighborhood and it was already a nightmare to evacuate. Very dangerous to add more houses
I am very highly against the development of the doubletree golf course
[email protected]
As a long time resident who has experienced numerous evacuations, I have significant concerns regarding the proposed development of the former Doubletree Golf Course. The proposal for a new road would still create a bottleneck leaving the community on a daily basis, and would be a public hazard in the event of an evacuation. The new proposed homes would reduce property value of those that have had green space views, and despite the proposal of making a 55+ community, the population impact on the local schools (which are already at max capacity) would be increased.