In light of the recent Students Association "Elections" we (the undersigned) feel that the Democratic process was abused and misused to secure the nomination of the ticket that was most favorable to the Advisers who selected the policy. To state that the grievance which brought about the third day of voting in the aforementioned "Elections" was unable to verify and based only on the hearsay of the original losing ticket and a group of people whom had openly poor relations with the Siglin Sutton ticket. If the violation was verifiable then the Finck Dahle ticket would benefit from the release of the entire grievance statement. The actions taken by the advisers of SA seemed biased and placed the results of the election into the hands of the apathetic students who did not feel their attendance was necessary in the original election. This election is at best a sham and smudge on Democracy and serve as a proof that the Democratic process is easily circumvented when one group is dissatisfied with the results.The newly "elected" Finck Dahle presidency will head the Students Association for the next fiscal year speaking as the voice for students. If you feel that this result seems unfair inform the SA Advisers by signing onto the petition and encourage more fair unbiased results in the future.