Ruby Mountain re-zoning could allow for commercial development
353 Comments
P
Pat Andrik
2 years ago
DO NOT ALLOW THIS TO HAPPEN. TOO MUCH OF OUR LAND SELLING TO CORPORATIONS THAT DO NOT CARE ABOUT WILDLIFE.....DO NOT ALLOW!!
K
Kyle
2 years ago
This is a precious mountain range to preserve. Can't imagine destroying it for a business that is bound to fail.
C
Catherine Ryals
2 years ago
Keep the Ruby Mountains undeveloped.
B
Brian Hill
2 years ago
Let's not Park city Spring Creek
A
Anonymous
2 years ago
Against- The ruby Mnts should not be turned into Tahoe, the road does not support the type of traffic associated with ski resorts. The mountain should be a protected area.
L
Lisa Passmore-Quade
2 years ago
Take your ski area somewhere else! We do not need this! As a native Nevadan and a past resident of Spring Creek, this will forever change the beautiful area that now exists. The wildlife will be decimated, make no mistake about that! There are plenty of ski areas in the west, what we are losing is are beautiful natural landscapes, once developed it can nevet be undone. Lake Tahoe is a perfect example! Look at what has happened at Paliades Tahoe, there is no going back, they (developers) are never satisfied, bigger, more, more, more! And yes, I'm a life-long skiier.
J
Joan Setka
2 years ago
This is a HUGE mistake.
K
Katie fite
2 years ago
This is a disastrous scheme that will wreck a beautiful area and wildlife habitats. The bio of the guy proposing the development shows before he did the recent Tech stuff he had worked for Credit Suisse. They’ve been involved in all kinds of past slimy ski resort stuff.
B
Beau creamer
2 years ago
We dont need anymore houses. Thats a key spot for are already hurting mule deer heards
A
Anita Briggs
2 years ago
The Ruby Mountains are critical wildlife habitat.
An emphatic no to this unnecessary development.
M
Melissa Giovanni
2 years ago
Leave the Rubys alone!! Is nothing sacred? Wild spaces must remain wild. Besides, ski resorts won’t be profitable for much longer the way global warming is going.
J
Jessica Peterson
2 years ago
Wildlife habitat is already scarce
The world really doesn't need another ski area.
“There are no unsacred places; there are only sacred places and desecrated places.” - Wendell Berry
M
Michael Cooper
2 years ago
As a Nevada resident I oppose this plan to develop this property. Will nothing stop the wealthy from pushing their ideas and money to ruin the heart of the Nevada Ruby Mountains. Take your $$$ and keep it in California.
S
Shelley Johnson
2 years ago
No way. There would be so many people it would turn out to be Little Tahoe. Rural would be gone.
J
Jeanna Mielcarek
2 years ago
The wild beauty of the Ruby Mountains shouldn't be threatened by private development
J
Jon Hirt
2 years ago
I support the Ruby mountains staying a wild place in perpetuity.
M
Michelle Trame
2 years ago
Keep the rubies wild
A
Anonymous
2 years ago
Not just no, but H*LL NO. The mines already ruined elko county, we definitely don’t need this to ruin the Rubies
I hate this saying, but don’t California or utah or Colorado, Nevada.
A
Anonymous
2 years ago
Can’t we enjoy nature the natural way? Why do we insist on spoiling anything good?
A
Anonymous
2 years ago
Keep wild places wild, not everything should be ‘developed’ to make money.
DO NOT ALLOW THIS TO HAPPEN. TOO MUCH OF OUR LAND SELLING TO CORPORATIONS THAT DO NOT CARE ABOUT WILDLIFE.....DO NOT ALLOW!!
This is a precious mountain range to preserve. Can't imagine destroying it for a business that is bound to fail.
Keep the Ruby Mountains undeveloped.
Let's not Park city Spring Creek
Against- The ruby Mnts should not be turned into Tahoe, the road does not support the type of traffic associated with ski resorts. The mountain should be a protected area.
Take your ski area somewhere else! We do not need this! As a native Nevadan and a past resident of Spring Creek, this will forever change the beautiful area that now exists. The wildlife will be decimated, make no mistake about that! There are plenty of ski areas in the west, what we are losing is are beautiful natural landscapes, once developed it can nevet be undone. Lake Tahoe is a perfect example! Look at what has happened at Paliades Tahoe, there is no going back, they (developers) are never satisfied, bigger, more, more, more! And yes, I'm a life-long skiier.
This is a HUGE mistake.
This is a disastrous scheme that will wreck a beautiful area and wildlife habitats. The bio of the guy proposing the development shows before he did the recent Tech stuff he had worked for Credit Suisse. They’ve been involved in all kinds of past slimy ski resort stuff.
We dont need anymore houses. Thats a key spot for are already hurting mule deer heards
The Ruby Mountains are critical wildlife habitat. An emphatic no to this unnecessary development.
Leave the Rubys alone!! Is nothing sacred? Wild spaces must remain wild. Besides, ski resorts won’t be profitable for much longer the way global warming is going.
Wildlife habitat is already scarce The world really doesn't need another ski area. “There are no unsacred places; there are only sacred places and desecrated places.” - Wendell Berry
As a Nevada resident I oppose this plan to develop this property. Will nothing stop the wealthy from pushing their ideas and money to ruin the heart of the Nevada Ruby Mountains. Take your $$$ and keep it in California.
No way. There would be so many people it would turn out to be Little Tahoe. Rural would be gone.
The wild beauty of the Ruby Mountains shouldn't be threatened by private development
I support the Ruby mountains staying a wild place in perpetuity.
Keep the rubies wild
Not just no, but H*LL NO. The mines already ruined elko county, we definitely don’t need this to ruin the Rubies I hate this saying, but don’t California or utah or Colorado, Nevada.
Can’t we enjoy nature the natural way? Why do we insist on spoiling anything good?
Keep wild places wild, not everything should be ‘developed’ to make money.