Skip to main content

Ruby Mountain re-zoning could allow for commercial development

353 Comments

J
Jacqueline Pendleton
1 year ago

I oppose developing the Ruby Mountains into a commercial development

S
Susan Saddoris
1 year ago

I want the mountains to stay natural.

P
Patricia
1 year ago

We do not want this. We love the Rubies and don't want to see such beauty be destroyed just for a ski resort. Do not build.

E
Erik Johnson
1 year ago

We don’t need to commercialize every wild place. Nevada is amazing because it is not California or colorado. Keep it wild and free!

B
Brian Graham
1 year ago

Keep the rubies wild

W
Wayne Overholser
1 year ago

Not needed here. Screw up your own state.

D
Deran Amerigian
1 year ago

Deran

D
Deborah Park-Wanner
1 year ago

Please preserve our beautiful canyon..DO NOT WANT SKI RESORT !!@!!

C
Camille meranda
1 year ago

As a local no one wants this. Don’t let the rich who don’t live here ruin our beauty

T
Teresa Valdez
1 year ago

Leave nature ALONE!! Do not destroy the beauty and tranquility of these Mountians. I have spent many hours there jus for peace of mind!!!

W
William Noble
1 year ago

As a teen I hiked and camped in the Ruby Mountains with my older brother. Don't destroy the peacefulness of this Nevada treasure. There is plenty of ski resorts and other land to develop elsewhere.

C
Charity Wanechek
1 year ago

As a resident of Spring Creek, NV ... specifically the Horse Palace Area... I oppose these plans for development in our area. Though me and my family love enjoying the outdoors, there are far too many issues with trying to develop land here for this type of use. It additionally will ruin the whole reason the majority of the people not only live in Spring Creek area, but also visit it. This San Francisco Tech Millionaire is more than welcome to build a home for himself and enjoy the nature around it. There is no need to ruin the nature here and then monetize it to try to turn Spring Creek into an entertainment destination. It is already a destination for outdoor enthusiasts that enjoy actual nature. Not curated mountain biking trails, snow machines, ski lifts, and swanky ski cabins for rent or sale. His vision may be more fitting for Lake Tahoe. I hear a smaller Ski Resort there is for sale. He could perhaps sell this land here, and buy land in Tahoe that's already set up for what he likes.

R
Richard Llewellyn
1 year ago

As a lifelong skier from a family with roots in the West since the early Oregon Trail -- I know this proposal would be the nail in the coffin for the Ruby Mountains. Send them packing!

M
Michelle and Dan Strozzi
1 year ago

Spring Creek and Wlko cannot handle this type of change. From inadequate roads to road maintenance. We don't drive over Elko summit and say "gee, I wish those mountains were covered with houses and a ski lift"

M
Martha Schott-Bernius
1 year ago

Agree with everything mentioned plus do you think tourism will come with how hard and expensive it is to travel into Elko? Say you fly into SLC or Reno, most will go to Park City or Tahoe. I don’t believe it will generate that much to economy and besides can we just this once forget the money and keep things as they are?

M
Mariah Brune
1 year ago

Totally against this. Think of the Earth. We don’t need another tourist destination.

A
Anonymous
1 year ago Featured

Aside from the ski resort, I’m largely concerned about the effect the “ski resort” type homes will have on our economy. The people who work ski resorts can’t afford to live in the towns they work in. Let’s not make this another Tahoe.

B
Bradley Burkett
1 year ago

We don't need a ski resort on the beautiful ruby mountains. Make the sno bowl better if anything but leave lamoille alone.

R
Robin Ray
1 year ago

Save the land

K
Karen Freiberg
1 year ago

Please keep this land as is wild and beautiful for future generations to see and enjoy as it is now.