Withhold funding for Nuclear Waste Storage before it's too late!
438 Comments
A
Armen Gasparian
8 years ago
Stop the madness.
J
Judy Lopez
8 years ago
Must be prevented to bury in ocean, NOT acceptable!!
P
Petti Van Rekom
8 years ago
My family has lived in San Clemente for over 50 years. The threat of a disaster from nuclear waste is a threat to our safety and well being. Please do NOT let Edison continue to store the waste at San Onofre.
J
Joanna Mathews
8 years ago
Move the waste away from the ocean. This is a disaster waiting to happen. Time for the government and utilities to accept responsibility. If nuclear plants were built and even still operating, there should be safe disposal sites built. 50+ years of waiting and doing nothing in terms of disposal is unacceptable to the health and future of our citizens.
T
Trevor Bryson
8 years ago
This is simply put a stupid idea!!
E
Elizabeth Lerer
8 years ago
Please Coastal Commission, prove you are being true to your mission, "The Commission is committed to protecting and enhancing California’s coast and ocean for present and future generations."
Find a better way to protect the coast. Please REVOKE the nuclear waste storage permit at San Onofre.
A
Andrew Ellis
8 years ago
SCE’s aging mangement plan that allows inspection of only 50% of the lower half of the spent fuel canisters is a recipe for disaster. An inspection plan that covers only half of the surface area of the canisters will not be able to detect radiation leaks from the San Onofre Storage facility.
L
Lisa Kopelman
8 years ago
I'm a long time resident of San Clemente and vehemently oppose the plan to bury the waste at San Onofre.
L
Lisa Tart
8 years ago
How udderly insane to even think about doing this project
B
Beckee Cost
8 years ago
This is completely unacceptable!
L
Lisa Goff
8 years ago
no nuclear waster here!
B
Bruce Campbell
8 years ago
At the CEP meeting when the CCC voted for a radwaste configuration on San Onofre State Beach, Dr. Singh of the Holtec Co. admitted that his company's nuclear waste canisters cannot be monitored, repackaged, or transported.
Thus, it is highly likely that any such configuration would become permanent -- unless a number of safety regulations are waived to allow some sort of repackaging and transport!
C
Chris Connolly
8 years ago
Please make Edison treat this Nuclear waste LIKE Nuclear waste, not take the cheap way out and bury it near our most precious resource, the Pacific Ocean!
J
Jerome Kirsling
8 years ago
This is a mater of not only environmental protection but of protecting the people of the United States and the globe. We cannot afford to be careless with this dangerous an issue!
J
Jerome Kirsling
8 years ago
This is a mater of not only environmental protection but of protecting the people of the United States and the globe. We cannot afford to be careless with this dangerous an issue!
J
Jeanne Green
8 years ago
Inadequate storage is unacceptable. Only Thick-wall casks be used as in other civilized countries.. Revoke storage permit at San Onofre.
J
Jill Estensen
8 years ago
Nuclear power without appropriate waste containment is irresponsibility in it's worst form, greed.
G
Grace van Thillo
8 years ago
The permit to store nuclear waste at SoCal Edison's San Onofre Nuclear Plant should be revoked. 8.5 million people live in the southland. Property and business values are some of the state/nation's highest. USMC Camp Pendleton is our nation's primary military base. Major north/south rail and transportation corridors pass by the stored waste. Any radioactive accident will be disastrous to human and all life and the area's land and ocean environment, and the economic viability of both state and nation.
Present storage casks are not tested for long-term storage. The NRC doesn't know what to expect! The highest grade, safest storage should be employed; and when safe to do so, with viable locations, the nuclear waste should be removed; not stored in San Onofre, until a natural disaster, earthquake and tsunami happen.
D
Duff Wilmoth
8 years ago
You have a nuclear reactor situated on the beach along the Pacific Ocean. Please fulfill your civic duty to Orange County, the ST CA and the charter you are mandated uphold to and be on the right side of history. .
Stop the madness.
Must be prevented to bury in ocean, NOT acceptable!!
My family has lived in San Clemente for over 50 years. The threat of a disaster from nuclear waste is a threat to our safety and well being. Please do NOT let Edison continue to store the waste at San Onofre.
Move the waste away from the ocean. This is a disaster waiting to happen. Time for the government and utilities to accept responsibility. If nuclear plants were built and even still operating, there should be safe disposal sites built. 50+ years of waiting and doing nothing in terms of disposal is unacceptable to the health and future of our citizens.
This is simply put a stupid idea!!
Please Coastal Commission, prove you are being true to your mission, "The Commission is committed to protecting and enhancing California’s coast and ocean for present and future generations." Find a better way to protect the coast. Please REVOKE the nuclear waste storage permit at San Onofre.
SCE’s aging mangement plan that allows inspection of only 50% of the lower half of the spent fuel canisters is a recipe for disaster. An inspection plan that covers only half of the surface area of the canisters will not be able to detect radiation leaks from the San Onofre Storage facility.
I'm a long time resident of San Clemente and vehemently oppose the plan to bury the waste at San Onofre.
How udderly insane to even think about doing this project
This is completely unacceptable!
no nuclear waster here!
At the CEP meeting when the CCC voted for a radwaste configuration on San Onofre State Beach, Dr. Singh of the Holtec Co. admitted that his company's nuclear waste canisters cannot be monitored, repackaged, or transported. Thus, it is highly likely that any such configuration would become permanent -- unless a number of safety regulations are waived to allow some sort of repackaging and transport!
Please make Edison treat this Nuclear waste LIKE Nuclear waste, not take the cheap way out and bury it near our most precious resource, the Pacific Ocean!
This is a mater of not only environmental protection but of protecting the people of the United States and the globe. We cannot afford to be careless with this dangerous an issue!
This is a mater of not only environmental protection but of protecting the people of the United States and the globe. We cannot afford to be careless with this dangerous an issue!
Inadequate storage is unacceptable. Only Thick-wall casks be used as in other civilized countries.. Revoke storage permit at San Onofre.
Nuclear power without appropriate waste containment is irresponsibility in it's worst form, greed.
The permit to store nuclear waste at SoCal Edison's San Onofre Nuclear Plant should be revoked. 8.5 million people live in the southland. Property and business values are some of the state/nation's highest. USMC Camp Pendleton is our nation's primary military base. Major north/south rail and transportation corridors pass by the stored waste. Any radioactive accident will be disastrous to human and all life and the area's land and ocean environment, and the economic viability of both state and nation. Present storage casks are not tested for long-term storage. The NRC doesn't know what to expect! The highest grade, safest storage should be employed; and when safe to do so, with viable locations, the nuclear waste should be removed; not stored in San Onofre, until a natural disaster, earthquake and tsunami happen.
You have a nuclear reactor situated on the beach along the Pacific Ocean. Please fulfill your civic duty to Orange County, the ST CA and the charter you are mandated uphold to and be on the right side of history. .
PLEASE! Find a better way.