Withhold funding for Nuclear Waste Storage before it's too late!
438 Comments
D
Daniel Headrick MD
8 years ago
Revoke
J
Jim Wells
8 years ago
What is the diplomatic way to say "What the fk was wrong with whomever of you voted before to approve the current permit for Southern California Edison to to store nuclear waste at their San Onofre site?" ? Regardless, that all of you should now revoke it is beyond question.
L
lisa uhrhammer
8 years ago
Featured
DO NOT LET THIS HAPPEN! THIS IS A PRIVATE COMPANY AND THE STOCKHOLDERS SHOULD PAY THE EXPENSE OF REMOVING THE NUCLEAR WASTE AND TAKING IT TO STORE IT FOR PERPETUITY. THE STOCKHOLDERS MADE MONEY AND NOW MUST FOOT THE BILL!!
S
Sharlene Bergart
8 years ago
Nuclear Waste Storage permit must be revoked. It is seriously flawed and dangerous for people and animals living nearby. It is also dangerous for the ocean. Stop this permit now.
J
John Leddy
8 years ago
Is the CCC still protecting our coast? That has been in doubt of late. The EPA and NRC are definitely hostiles. BACT is a must for decommissioning dirty nukes. CCC, do your job!
G
Georgette Korsen
8 years ago
This is an outrageous decision that is not in the best interest of any of the 65,000 people who live in San Clemente, nor any of the hundreds of thousands that live further north or south. We have lived with those nuclear plants for years, dreading an accident or release of radiation. NOW is the time to finally keep us safe, out of harms way. PLEASE, do not store those casks on site, in harms way. PLEASE.
D
dorothy varellas
8 years ago
Are you kidding? Doesn't anyone remember what happened at Fukushima? Doesn't anyone on the CCC know that we live on earthquake faults? Storing nuclear waste at Son Onofre on the edge of the ocean is the most stupid idea I have ever heard of, short of building Diablo Canyon on the oceans edge!
You are playing with fire and the lives of millions of people are in jeopardy. Get real and do not authorize this terrible plan.
W
Wendy Morris
8 years ago
How could you approve this? It is too dangerous to transport or to store in yucca mountain. But ok to bury next to the ocean and state park in this highly populated area. That doesn't make sense.
P
Peter Giannola
8 years ago
Nuclear waste is the most serious environmental problem now facing us. It's our responsibility to future generations solve this problem.
J
Janice Burstin
8 years ago
IT'S MUCH TOO RISKY TO BURY NUCLEAR WASTE AT SAN ONOFRE IN UNSAFE CANNISTERS!! THIS IS NOT AN EXPERIMENT...WE ARE NOT GUINEA PIGS!!
G
Glenn Frieder
8 years ago
Too dangerous with our being on a earth quake fault
P
Prisca Gloor
8 years ago
Please save lives and nature and don't store nuclear waste near the ocean.
J
Judy Northrop
8 years ago
This plan is absurd and dangerous!
L
Laurenn Barker
8 years ago
Please revoke the petition that was approved for this storage as it was improperly granted based on current knowledge and industry standards.
D
Don McKelvey
8 years ago
This is a no-brainer !
J
JoAnne Gervase
8 years ago
Please do not allow the radioactive waste at San Onofre to be buried near the ocean. Thank you
L
Liz Kuhns
8 years ago
Why put lives and the future at risk? If safer storage is available, what is the reason for not choosing it?
S
Susan Wingfield-Ritter
8 years ago
Thin-wall canisters are too dangerous to allow. Please act accordingly.
S
Sally Barron
8 years ago
The current permit is flawed and must be revoked. The lives of thousands of Californians depend on it,
C
Charles Langley
8 years ago
Featured
There is such a cloud of controversy and public suspicion about the way the original permit was issued that it behooves the Commission to restore trust by suspending the permit until a proper vote and an informed public discussion
can occur.
Revoke
What is the diplomatic way to say "What the fk was wrong with whomever of you voted before to approve the current permit for Southern California Edison to to store nuclear waste at their San Onofre site?" ? Regardless, that all of you should now revoke it is beyond question.
DO NOT LET THIS HAPPEN! THIS IS A PRIVATE COMPANY AND THE STOCKHOLDERS SHOULD PAY THE EXPENSE OF REMOVING THE NUCLEAR WASTE AND TAKING IT TO STORE IT FOR PERPETUITY. THE STOCKHOLDERS MADE MONEY AND NOW MUST FOOT THE BILL!!
Nuclear Waste Storage permit must be revoked. It is seriously flawed and dangerous for people and animals living nearby. It is also dangerous for the ocean. Stop this permit now.
Is the CCC still protecting our coast? That has been in doubt of late. The EPA and NRC are definitely hostiles. BACT is a must for decommissioning dirty nukes. CCC, do your job!
This is an outrageous decision that is not in the best interest of any of the 65,000 people who live in San Clemente, nor any of the hundreds of thousands that live further north or south. We have lived with those nuclear plants for years, dreading an accident or release of radiation. NOW is the time to finally keep us safe, out of harms way. PLEASE, do not store those casks on site, in harms way. PLEASE.
Are you kidding? Doesn't anyone remember what happened at Fukushima? Doesn't anyone on the CCC know that we live on earthquake faults? Storing nuclear waste at Son Onofre on the edge of the ocean is the most stupid idea I have ever heard of, short of building Diablo Canyon on the oceans edge! You are playing with fire and the lives of millions of people are in jeopardy. Get real and do not authorize this terrible plan.
How could you approve this? It is too dangerous to transport or to store in yucca mountain. But ok to bury next to the ocean and state park in this highly populated area. That doesn't make sense.
Nuclear waste is the most serious environmental problem now facing us. It's our responsibility to future generations solve this problem.
IT'S MUCH TOO RISKY TO BURY NUCLEAR WASTE AT SAN ONOFRE IN UNSAFE CANNISTERS!! THIS IS NOT AN EXPERIMENT...WE ARE NOT GUINEA PIGS!!
Too dangerous with our being on a earth quake fault
Please save lives and nature and don't store nuclear waste near the ocean.
This plan is absurd and dangerous!
Please revoke the petition that was approved for this storage as it was improperly granted based on current knowledge and industry standards.
This is a no-brainer !
Please do not allow the radioactive waste at San Onofre to be buried near the ocean. Thank you
Why put lives and the future at risk? If safer storage is available, what is the reason for not choosing it?
Thin-wall canisters are too dangerous to allow. Please act accordingly.
The current permit is flawed and must be revoked. The lives of thousands of Californians depend on it,
There is such a cloud of controversy and public suspicion about the way the original permit was issued that it behooves the Commission to restore trust by suspending the permit until a proper vote and an informed public discussion can occur.