This needs to be put on hold until a permanent superintendent is hired.
N
Nina Hisiger
7 years ago
RPS taxpaying parent (RHS, SRMS)
A
Anonymous
7 years ago
Taxpayer
Not in favor of the earlier start times.
R
Robert Lavelle
7 years ago
Taxpayer
L
Laura
7 years ago
The kids will get the same amount to sleep regardless of the start up time parents need to do a better job of taking away electronics and making the kids go to bed
B
Bob Cousins
7 years ago
There is no valid justification for this initiative. It is being promoted when likely 80 percent of residents oppose it.
R
Robin Williams
7 years ago
RPS Taxpaying parent FES & RHS
S
Sharon Restivo
7 years ago
This initiative is too expensive and will be enveloped by problems and conflicts. Refer to the issues that Greenwich experienced.
K
Karina Towne
7 years ago
Leave it as is
M
Michael Andrews
7 years ago
RPS taxpayer - 1 graduate, 1 RHS, 1 ERMS
An inefficient use of increasingly limited resources that may positively benefit some, but will definitely have many unintended consequences. Stop this train before it is too late!
H
Heather
7 years ago
Taxpayer
K
Keith Olsen
7 years ago
Ridgefield Taxpayer & parent (Ridgebury & SRMS)
E
Elizabeth Potel
7 years ago
Taxpayer-RPS Parent ( RHS) & ( Farmingville)
J
James
7 years ago
Enough is enough. The students, teachers and parents all are opposed. Time to listen to the community you serve.
A
Anonymous
7 years ago
We have so many other pressing issues to pay for at our schools!
J
JONATHAN SUCATO
7 years ago
2 RPS kids, 2 taxpayers, and 0 confidence in SST initiative (inefficient use of resources)
R
Richard Vazzana
7 years ago
No way. This is a waste of money
N
Neil W Flanagan
7 years ago
Taxpayer. Parent of 4 boys that have gone through the RPS system
M
Mary Ann Morris
7 years ago
RPS parent and taxpayer (Scott’s Ridge and Scotland Elementary)
This needs to be put on hold until a permanent superintendent is hired.
RPS taxpaying parent (RHS, SRMS)
Taxpayer Not in favor of the earlier start times.
Taxpayer
The kids will get the same amount to sleep regardless of the start up time parents need to do a better job of taking away electronics and making the kids go to bed
There is no valid justification for this initiative. It is being promoted when likely 80 percent of residents oppose it.
RPS Taxpaying parent FES & RHS
This initiative is too expensive and will be enveloped by problems and conflicts. Refer to the issues that Greenwich experienced.
Leave it as is
RPS taxpayer - 1 graduate, 1 RHS, 1 ERMS An inefficient use of increasingly limited resources that may positively benefit some, but will definitely have many unintended consequences. Stop this train before it is too late!
Taxpayer
Ridgefield Taxpayer & parent (Ridgebury & SRMS)
Taxpayer-RPS Parent ( RHS) & ( Farmingville)
Enough is enough. The students, teachers and parents all are opposed. Time to listen to the community you serve.
We have so many other pressing issues to pay for at our schools!
2 RPS kids, 2 taxpayers, and 0 confidence in SST initiative (inefficient use of resources)
No way. This is a waste of money
Taxpayer. Parent of 4 boys that have gone through the RPS system
RPS parent and taxpayer (Scott’s Ridge and Scotland Elementary)
Taxpaying RPS Parent (Ridgebury elementary)