Add the money to the Alternative school and let those kids who want to take advantage of the later start time, do it there!
D
Dain M Vanderminden
7 years ago
Taxpayer
T
TJ Bergeron
7 years ago
Featured
Taxpayer and resident with two children in school at SRMS and REMS. Also a coach for both Ridgefield Youth Wrestling programs. This initiative will be detrimental to our wrestling program by forcing our practices to start later and may eliminate the possibility of participation for our younger wrestlers.
M
Mike Sheehan
7 years ago
Wilton resident - taxes of all kinds are destroying CT and stimulating only an exodus
H
Hannah Ward
7 years ago
Ridgefield resident/registered voter
K
Kristin DAmilio
7 years ago
Taxpayer. Two students are SES and one at Scott’s Ridge. Please listen to your constituents. Waste of money that could go elsewhere.
A
Anonymous
7 years ago
taxpayer
J
Jennelle Black
7 years ago
Taxpaying RPS parent of 4 (3 at SES)
M
Marina Libonati
7 years ago
I oppose the SSL initiative.
S
Sheila Johnson
7 years ago
Son at VPS, another at ERMS and twins at RHS. Totally against changing start times If approved, need to remember in November and replace BoE!
M
Miles Hisiger
7 years ago
No Change in start times. Must have the permanent Superintendent and rest of the Administration "buy in" to any plan prior to it being enacted. Do we know the added costs and are the Town officials ( in particular those that pass on the budget) behind the proposal to the degree necessary such that they will not require any School Budget cuts in the future to offset the added cost.
D
Donna Rondano
7 years ago
Not for ssl
A
Anonymous
7 years ago
Not so SSL
K
Kim d
7 years ago
Against ssl
A
Anonymous
7 years ago
taxpaying RPS parent(Scotts Ridge Middle School, Ridgefield High School)
E
Eric M Brown
7 years ago
child at RHS Taxpayer
B
Bruce Brown
7 years ago
Taxpayer - 3 RPS students.
NO to changing school start times
Tax paying resident with two children at VPES.
taxpaying RPS parent (SES)
RHS tax paying parent
Add the money to the Alternative school and let those kids who want to take advantage of the later start time, do it there!
Taxpayer
Taxpayer and resident with two children in school at SRMS and REMS. Also a coach for both Ridgefield Youth Wrestling programs. This initiative will be detrimental to our wrestling program by forcing our practices to start later and may eliminate the possibility of participation for our younger wrestlers.
Wilton resident - taxes of all kinds are destroying CT and stimulating only an exodus
Ridgefield resident/registered voter
Taxpayer. Two students are SES and one at Scott’s Ridge. Please listen to your constituents. Waste of money that could go elsewhere.
taxpayer
Taxpaying RPS parent of 4 (3 at SES)
I oppose the SSL initiative.
Son at VPS, another at ERMS and twins at RHS. Totally against changing start times If approved, need to remember in November and replace BoE!
No Change in start times. Must have the permanent Superintendent and rest of the Administration "buy in" to any plan prior to it being enacted. Do we know the added costs and are the Town officials ( in particular those that pass on the budget) behind the proposal to the degree necessary such that they will not require any School Budget cuts in the future to offset the added cost.
Not for ssl
Not so SSL
Against ssl
taxpaying RPS parent(Scotts Ridge Middle School, Ridgefield High School)
child at RHS Taxpayer
Taxpayer - 3 RPS students. NO to changing school start times