Ridgefield taxpayerbwith kids in rps..2 go to RHS and 1 goes to ERMS
J
John Stofka
7 years ago
Featured
Tax paying RPS parent (RHS)
I think it would disrupt many families morning routines. It would also affect after school activities and part time jobs for high schoolers. They’ll have to get up early for many college classes. So how is this helpful?
R
Robert Brooks
7 years ago
Taxpayer with 2 Kids at Righedfield High School
M
Maria Stofka
7 years ago
Tax paying RPS parent (RHS)
D
Debra Hopkr
7 years ago
Taxpaying RPS Parent (Scotland)
L
Lisa Lanspery
7 years ago
SES, SRMS parent
M
Michael Aronow
7 years ago
I am strongly opposed to this plan. It doesn't appear to reflect the will of the community. Please stop trying to ram it through and listen to the majority of residents who do not want to see it enacted.
H
Hilary Aronow
7 years ago
Please listen to the majority who voted to keep school start times unchanged. Stop wasting taxpayer dollars on this initiative.
S
Suzanne Sherter
7 years ago
I believe in this cause,but not T this time. Presently, I believe our focus and our dollars needs to be centered on curriculum and ensuring we deliver an appropriate and challenging education to ALL children. We need to ensure that changes do not take away from other areas of education that help make our children well rounded and ready to embrace the challenges of their future.
A
Anonymous
7 years ago
Cost does not equate to benefit. Cost projections are much higher than when the green light was given to move forward.
J
Jennafer Mesigian
7 years ago
Find a better way.
S
Sheri Landry
7 years ago
Ridiculous to change the little ones start times when the high schoolers need to get used to waking up early for life..and they’ve been doing it for years.
K
Kristin Boylan
7 years ago
If changing school start times means cutting monies that would be allocated to academic enhancements, I am strongly opposed to moving forward with this plan. (SRMS, RHS)
Ridgefield taxpayerbwith kids in rps..2 go to RHS and 1 goes to ERMS
Tax paying RPS parent (RHS) I think it would disrupt many families morning routines. It would also affect after school activities and part time jobs for high schoolers. They’ll have to get up early for many college classes. So how is this helpful?
Taxpayer with 2 Kids at Righedfield High School
Tax paying RPS parent (RHS)
Taxpaying RPS Parent (Scotland)
SES, SRMS parent
I am strongly opposed to this plan. It doesn't appear to reflect the will of the community. Please stop trying to ram it through and listen to the majority of residents who do not want to see it enacted.
Please listen to the majority who voted to keep school start times unchanged. Stop wasting taxpayer dollars on this initiative.
I believe in this cause,but not T this time. Presently, I believe our focus and our dollars needs to be centered on curriculum and ensuring we deliver an appropriate and challenging education to ALL children. We need to ensure that changes do not take away from other areas of education that help make our children well rounded and ready to embrace the challenges of their future.
Cost does not equate to benefit. Cost projections are much higher than when the green light was given to move forward.
Find a better way.
Ridiculous to change the little ones start times when the high schoolers need to get used to waking up early for life..and they’ve been doing it for years.
If changing school start times means cutting monies that would be allocated to academic enhancements, I am strongly opposed to moving forward with this plan. (SRMS, RHS)
BES parent and taxpayer
RHS parent.
SRMS and SES parent
SRMS and RES Parent
RHS Student
BES and ERMS parent
BES parent