How does reducing the service help pollution if we are forced to use our cars down to the main road to get a more frequent service.
S
Susy Serrano Gonzalez
1 year ago
Resident of Birch Three Avenue
B
Beverley George
1 year ago
Two buses an hour is not enough ! Think of the older generation that can not walk down to the main road if they have appointments to make .
They deserve better !
S
Sheena Ball
1 year ago
This bus needs to run 4 times an hour at least.
A
Anonymous
1 year ago
No warning!
People have to go to work and pupils to school. Unfair to everyone even pensioners.
J
John Nothard
1 year ago
We need 3 an hour frequency
K
Kelly Garratty
1 year ago
A ridiculous decision especially without the residents being informed, consulted or considered
C
Chris P
1 year ago
Our street and the surrounding areas rely heavily on the 138 bus service for essential daily travel — getting children to school, reaching the train station, and commuting to work. Removing or changing this service will have a significant impact on our community. We respectfully urge you to reconsider this decision and keep the 138 bus service running as it is.
C
Carole Ross
1 year ago
Please reverse this decision to reduce the buses in our area .
S
Steph C
1 year ago
This route is a necessity for many young people travelling to and from school. Please review peak school time bus timings.
A
Anonymous
1 year ago
The bus frequency and route must be reinstated. School kids, elderly and commuters heavily rely on this service.
A
Alex Venetico
1 year ago
I use the bus to get to get my train which gets me in at a respectful time. But now I miss it. I either have to get in late or wake up a half hour earlier.
P
Pamela Bourke
1 year ago
We need this service
J
Jan Yarker
1 year ago
No one was told of this, were we meant to find out the hard way? These changes upset a lot of people, especially parents who's children need to be at school for a certain time. Why leave them vulnerable at school gates?
A
Anonymous
1 year ago
Just made it harder for workers to get to to their Hayes trains. Schoolchildren bundling onto fewer buses. Poor communication over new timetable.
J
Joanne Morley
1 year ago
Featured
This bus service is vital for all who use it school, children, the elderly in a very hilly area who otherwise may struggle to get out, commuters travelling to from work,. With ulez now in action in our area it’s not fair to now cut bus services we’ve been forced into using.
J
Jemma Pritchard
1 year ago
This is a very busy useful service for someone who doesn’t drive but also my children will get the bus .
I wish for it to resume the previous timetable .
A
Anonymous
1 year ago
Why change our only bus service on the Coney Hall estate?
Should be more than 3 an hour!
How does reducing the service help pollution if we are forced to use our cars down to the main road to get a more frequent service.
Resident of Birch Three Avenue
Two buses an hour is not enough ! Think of the older generation that can not walk down to the main road if they have appointments to make . They deserve better !
This bus needs to run 4 times an hour at least.
No warning! People have to go to work and pupils to school. Unfair to everyone even pensioners.
We need 3 an hour frequency
A ridiculous decision especially without the residents being informed, consulted or considered
Our street and the surrounding areas rely heavily on the 138 bus service for essential daily travel — getting children to school, reaching the train station, and commuting to work. Removing or changing this service will have a significant impact on our community. We respectfully urge you to reconsider this decision and keep the 138 bus service running as it is.
Please reverse this decision to reduce the buses in our area .
This route is a necessity for many young people travelling to and from school. Please review peak school time bus timings.
The bus frequency and route must be reinstated. School kids, elderly and commuters heavily rely on this service.
I use the bus to get to get my train which gets me in at a respectful time. But now I miss it. I either have to get in late or wake up a half hour earlier.
We need this service
No one was told of this, were we meant to find out the hard way? These changes upset a lot of people, especially parents who's children need to be at school for a certain time. Why leave them vulnerable at school gates?
Just made it harder for workers to get to to their Hayes trains. Schoolchildren bundling onto fewer buses. Poor communication over new timetable.
This bus service is vital for all who use it school, children, the elderly in a very hilly area who otherwise may struggle to get out, commuters travelling to from work,. With ulez now in action in our area it’s not fair to now cut bus services we’ve been forced into using.
This is a very busy useful service for someone who doesn’t drive but also my children will get the bus . I wish for it to resume the previous timetable .
Why change our only bus service on the Coney Hall estate?
rely on it.