Skip to main content

Reverse planning permission in local AONB

1,047 Comments

A
Anonymous
6 years ago

Outrageous. This is obviously a completely unsuitable development.

R
Roger Lowry
6 years ago

Time for change up to CC

S
Shane Hircock
6 years ago

This should not happen. Once this is allowed it will set precedent!!

M
Matthew Bisco
6 years ago

The conflict of interests here is stark and local planning protocols should be reviewed urgently.

A
Anonymous
6 years ago

Simply unethical

M
mo west
6 years ago

It wouldn`t last five minutes on such an exposed sight !!

L
Lisa Dudson
6 years ago

Protect AONBs!

A
Anne
6 years ago

Let's keep some places wild and ubspoilt

L
Liz Carter
6 years ago

Hands off our beautiful countryside! Has the pandemic taught nothing about the value of nature & this beauty?

W
Wendy Haslam
6 years ago

The local papers should plaster this all over their front pages. Disgusting.

K
Kahuna jay
6 years ago

Typically it's not what you know but who. Shame on them

R
Roger Williams
6 years ago

One rule for them, and another for us. Shocking.

M
Marcus Atkinson
6 years ago

Double standards and dodgy dealings. Well done on ignoring your own very clear policy on AONB . Let's just concrete the whole lot, it won't matter then.

L
Lance Dyer
6 years ago

Cornwall is being over developed with properties that are not for local need and, as in this case, in areas of outstanding natural beauty! The natural beauty of Cornwall, with associated habitats, is being destroyed!

D
David Gamblin
6 years ago

Apparently the applicant discussed a single storey house but was inexplicably told by planning it would not likely gain permission as out of keeping with local farmhouses. How much better suited to this site would a low-level stone-built property have been that looked as if it was just another ancillary farm building? www.ramehead.wordpress.com

M
Margaret Paddon
6 years ago

This should be left as it is. Beautiful landscape should be left.

A
Andrea Scurlock
6 years ago

I am so upset by this decision. I can't believe that 7 councillors voted to approve it.

A
Anonymous
6 years ago

Nothing changes

T
Tristan Price
6 years ago

There was clearly huge local opposition to this and a dodgy application process. Save the Rame from development like this!

J
John Knowles
6 years ago Featured

There seem to be so many anomalies with the process by which this decision was reached, that you begin to lose faith in the measures that have been put in place to preserve and protect the beauty of the Cornish landscape, and the people entrusted to carry them out.