I appreciate that there needs to be consideration to the workers but any building in an area of AONB should be stopped.
A
Anonymous
6 years ago
AONB should be protected!
R
Robert Reynolds
6 years ago
Rame is such a beautiful place. Why spoil it with a horrible house.
J
Julie Barley
6 years ago
Disgusting & unforgiveable, AONB should not be destroyed by those that think they are exempt from planning control!!!
J
Jacqui Brasher
6 years ago
This must be prevented! Protect our unique AONB!
G
Gillian Phillips
6 years ago
Money talks
J
Joan Ryan
6 years ago
What a disgrace allowing a house to be built in such AONB. What are we paying our planning officers for if we cannot protect against such a travesty. Agricultural workers - really!!
M
Mary Broadhead
6 years ago
This is an outrage!
A
Ann raynor
6 years ago
Cornwall is vanishing, no one will visit soon, it’s being ruined
J
Joanna Handley
6 years ago
Could another site not be proposed for the development?
L
LESLEY LLOYD
6 years ago
This would set a precedent for the future of building on AONB and should NOT be allowed to happen.
K
Kate Tisdell
6 years ago
This is disgraceful if its not stopped it will set a precedent that will see, the destruction of coadtal beauty.
A
Anonymous
6 years ago
This decision goes completely against the purpose of having planning controls in the first place. Once the damage is done it cannot be undone.
T
Timothy Handley
6 years ago
Stop this development, which has obvious transparency issues at Council level
A
Anthony barr
6 years ago
Sounds like there has been some lies told here. It also points to the fact that there is outside interference in planning decisions which are not decided constitutionally & without an appeals process which is illegal.Apparently evidence , logic & public opinion is ignored by 7 people who are not representing the people. Who has applied to build this & for who,names, are important information in the public interest to avoid vested interest.
S
Sidney Porter
6 years ago
It may be a farm workers house for a while, and then sold at an extortionate price as a second home
S
Stephen Waller
6 years ago
Under no circumstances should this approval go ahead in such a special area. It would ruin the splendid isolation experience for so many people.
A
Andy Norfolk
6 years ago
This is a bad decision. The landscape and visual impact assessment was poor and misleading. The decision is clearly contrary to various CLP policies.
D
David Kitchener
6 years ago
A clear case of abuse of position of authority. Failing to declare an interest. Should not be approved.
I appreciate that there needs to be consideration to the workers but any building in an area of AONB should be stopped.
AONB should be protected!
Rame is such a beautiful place. Why spoil it with a horrible house.
Disgusting & unforgiveable, AONB should not be destroyed by those that think they are exempt from planning control!!!
This must be prevented! Protect our unique AONB!
Money talks
What a disgrace allowing a house to be built in such AONB. What are we paying our planning officers for if we cannot protect against such a travesty. Agricultural workers - really!!
This is an outrage!
Cornwall is vanishing, no one will visit soon, it’s being ruined
Could another site not be proposed for the development?
This would set a precedent for the future of building on AONB and should NOT be allowed to happen.
This is disgraceful if its not stopped it will set a precedent that will see, the destruction of coadtal beauty.
This decision goes completely against the purpose of having planning controls in the first place. Once the damage is done it cannot be undone.
Stop this development, which has obvious transparency issues at Council level
Sounds like there has been some lies told here. It also points to the fact that there is outside interference in planning decisions which are not decided constitutionally & without an appeals process which is illegal.Apparently evidence , logic & public opinion is ignored by 7 people who are not representing the people. Who has applied to build this & for who,names, are important information in the public interest to avoid vested interest.
It may be a farm workers house for a while, and then sold at an extortionate price as a second home
Under no circumstances should this approval go ahead in such a special area. It would ruin the splendid isolation experience for so many people.
This is a bad decision. The landscape and visual impact assessment was poor and misleading. The decision is clearly contrary to various CLP policies.
A clear case of abuse of position of authority. Failing to declare an interest. Should not be approved.
Please leave building sites out of our AONBs