Skip to main content

Reverse planning permission in local AONB

1,047 Comments

A
Anne-Marie Rowlings
6 years ago

Whose in whose pocket, to let this dam truly awful place get the go ahead, I am totally & Truly utterly disgusted with this decision, how much more of Cornwall are you going to destroy of Cornwall, before you are happy?? MY FAMILY & I did not agree with how so easy our beautifull and peaceful at times, Cornwall. How anyone can come along & Just destroy parts of natural beauty, haven't you all learnt from not only the likes of chefs Gordon Ramsey and Rick Stein.. Sadly and very angrily Cornwall and the extremely beautiful South West is being destroyed in front of our very own eyes, and yet our thoughts and opinions are not even taken into account, you are killing Cornwall and the natural beauty of the place.. My family have lived here for generations, when at least people's opinions etc meant something now what?? Not only the land sea and air being destroyed but allso regional accents, I am sick to my stomach, of hearing events like this being yet again ruled over everyone's heads..

M
Mike Kyle
6 years ago

Should not be allowed to be built under any circumstance.

M
Marcus Rampley
6 years ago

CCC Have got to get a grip on development in AONB. This designation seems pointless given the planning committees disregard for it

J
Jane
6 years ago

This goes against basic principles for planning in areas of beauty and of interest to wildlife. It will spoil the environment , spoil the view. Tame head is such a beauty sit on Cornish coastal path it’s unbelievable this has been considered

R
Richard Montague-Thompson
6 years ago

this

A
Anonymous
6 years ago

Against the planning of a dwelling at an protected AONB

C
Charlotte Wallace
6 years ago

Further building would ruin rame head

M
Merv Davey
6 years ago

CC planning go against public opinion and advice from heritage organisations because they are Westminister driven. They do not provide a service Cornwall needs but one that Westminster thinks Cornwall should have .

G
Gill Burrage
6 years ago

This must be one of the ugliest house designs I have ever seen. If a dwelling needs to be built a traditional Cornish cottage style home with a lower visual impact would be more in keeping with the area.

D
Darren Rosevear
6 years ago

We need to protect our AONBs. The development is appalling. The fact the applicant is Chair of the Parish Council, suggests a whiff of corruption. Disgraceful.

A
Alan Lemin
6 years ago

As an ex Plymouth City Councillor and member of the planning committee, it is obvious that this proposed development will obviously impact upon the natural environment and is no way sympathetic to the area designated as an area of outstanding natural beauty. The proposal flies in the face of the recommendations provided by qualified planning officers. There are also questions to be answered by the applicant with regard to disclosure of conflicting interests. This proposed development will set a president for ignoring areas of outstanding natural beauty and open the door to building on green belt land. The decision taken by what amounts to laymen should be reversed and a full and proper investigation conducted into potential conflict of interest on behalf of the applicant and colleagues on the planning committee.

M
Miranda Penn
6 years ago

I hope the chair has not abused his position

V
Vivien nettles ng
6 years ago

AONB Building won’t fit in with the area at all

C
Chris
6 years ago

Cornwall Council must be held to account for a flagrant failure to protect this AONB.

E
Eric Giles
6 years ago

An area of onb says it all. Keep it as it is

M
Martin Perry
6 years ago

Completely inappropriate development. The ruse of saying it is for agricultural workers is a nonsense that has been used over many years in Cornwall and elsewhere.

R
Robin Brown
6 years ago

This is a travesty, another property for the wealthy. How can this be for low paid farm workers, the planners should sacked for a gross dereliction of their responsibilities. We had a chalet a Freathy for nearly 40 years & it was nigh on impossible to get planning permission even for simple enhancements

D
David Morris
6 years ago

Should not have been allowed

P
Phoenix Elleschild
6 years ago

They are destroying something beautiful that means a lot to previous generations and would provide the same to future generations.

L
Lucy Tregunna
6 years ago

Defend our AONB for future generations and enquiries need to be made as to why local representatives decided to ignore the general public feeling.