Skip to main content

Reverse planning permission in local AONB

1,047 Comments

M
Mark Cropper
6 years ago

The Rames’ expansive areas are little developed and as such are valued and much used as an amenity by city dwellers from Plymouth. The area gained international recognition for its unique landscape when used as a setting in the movie “Mr. Turner”. The new farmhouse could be positioned more discreetly within the landscape.

V
Venetia Lynch
6 years ago

Please sign. Thus area is one of outstanding natural beauty and should not be built on

J
Judi Strega
6 years ago

No No No! You cannot openly endorse this kind of shenanigans! Reverse it now.

J
Julian Constantine
6 years ago

There can only be corrupt incentives for consenting to this inappropriate planning application and it would probably be better to squelch it now before those implicated are presented with less appealing options. The signatories on record are easily susceptible to an analysis.

M
Michael Whiting
6 years ago

Planning process in this country is no longer fit for purpose. The process is far from transparent and impact on the environment is often overlooked.

W
William Fowles
6 years ago

I am yet another person that is tired of Cornwall Council allowing the development of every last green space of Cornwall. It must stop! And specially in our AONB's!

J
Jennifer Kilgour
6 years ago

The area is designated an AONB No one, not even a parish council chair with a father on the Council, should be allowed to build there

S
Stephanie Gait
6 years ago

There appears to be a clear conflict of interest in this case

A
Anonymous
6 years ago

Utterly absurd and perverse decision

N
Nigel Leeming
6 years ago

Clearly a terrible idea that will only encourage more people to try and do the same. We need more house, but not right there.

S
Sarah Chudleigh
6 years ago

Because: land - it's one thing that they're not making anymore

M
Mike Southern
6 years ago

Sounds to be a conflict of interest

J
Judith holt
6 years ago

this area if outstanding natural beauty must be preserved!

A
Andrew Cross
6 years ago

Building a house in this location is outrageous- how to ruin a beauty spot

A
Anonymous
6 years ago

Absolutely disgusted and shocked by this decision against ALL of the professional advice, hundreds of local objections, turns out applicant is chair of parish council - the only people in favour. Absolute corruption. So many beauty areas already spoiled by terrible planning decisions, so here we go again. The design and scale of the property clearly show that no matter what restrictions are put on this, it WILL end up being sold as a holiday/2nd/ home at some point for millions. Horrendous.

B
Beryl Collins
6 years ago

Don’t ruin anymore of our beautiful countryside

G
Geoffrey Bucknall
6 years ago

Disgraceful. When the workers finally leave, the landowner will have a house worth a lot of money to do with as they wish. Totally shambollic

M
Mark Collingwood
6 years ago

the same farmer, has altered the iconic headland with his string of holiday caravans, and his proposed house will add to the devastating alteration of this very unique and special profile.

L
Liz
6 years ago

Agricultural = get a few sheep, grow a few swede and then decide shortly after moving in, you don't like having sheep or growing swedes, do you have to sell to someone who does or pull the house down?

R
Roger Mills
6 years ago

It’s not what you know. It’s who you know by the sound of it. AGAIN