Skip to main content

Reverse planning permission in local AONB

1,047 Comments

S
Sue Martin Curtis
6 years ago

The whole of the Rame peninsula is truly an area of outstanding beauty. PLEASE leave it that way for future generations to love as we do.

L
Liz Buckingham
6 years ago

Unbelievable! This decision needs to be reversed!!

L
Lewi Skinner
6 years ago

The scale and grandeur of the plans are clearly in excess of the "intended use"

C
Christopher Wall
6 years ago

AONB should not be built on! Shame on you Council!

S
Sharon Whitear
6 years ago

Please do not ruin this beautiful spot.

A
andrew peach
6 years ago

An absolute tragedy that this proposal got through. Will destroy a area of natural beauty because a parish councillor wants to live there for his own selfish gains.

A
Anonymous
6 years ago

Such a controversial decision needs to be revisited please!

A
Anne-Marie Sutcliffe
6 years ago

This is a travesty of the planning process which should protect our AONB. In this case both the parish council and county council have failed in their duty.

K
Kath Overton
6 years ago

Unbelievable. How can we trust Cornwall Council to care for our environment.

K
K Williams
6 years ago

It's an AONB and should be protected from inappropriate development.

P
Phil
6 years ago

Please protect our amazingly beautiful place

M
Mrs Sue Anderson
6 years ago

This is wrong and it needs to be rectified!!

J
Jocelyn Murgatroyd
6 years ago

What is the point of having an AONB and all the special protections this is supposed to entail, when Cornwall Council approve such a dwelling?! Please reverse this decision

H
Hazel Moorey
6 years ago

Vehemently opposed. Millbrook resident.

A
Anonymous
6 years ago

Pls leave this beautiful area unspoilt.

Y
Yvonne Wainwright
6 years ago

Keep things as they are at Rame Head, keep the developers at bay. Beautiful landscapes.

P
Pamela Rose
6 years ago

I wasn’t at when the meeting when this went through. However, I understand that the way the motion was flipped at the last minute, meant that there was wholesale confusion about what was being voted for!

A
Anonymous
6 years ago

Proper process has not been followed that is clear, I am shocked it has gone through in its current design and process. Something more in keeping and smaller in scale a possible option, if found that there has to be accommodation built there. Maybe an agreement that only agricultural workers living in AND if ever sold too in the future and no holiday letting. I think ANOB area should have stronger position to say no, I thought it did, so very disappointing.

N
Nicola Cull
6 years ago

This is very difficult to understand. There appears to be some very dubious conflicts here which have not been managed.

D
Deborah Webb
6 years ago

It is an AOONB - what is the point of such designation if planning can be granted