Rethink Drug Consumption Sites, Seattle and King County!
93 Comments
A
Anonymous
9 years ago
I'm a news reporter with KIRO7 and am interested in an interview with Corri Durant and/or the petition organizer. Can you email me at [email protected], or call me at 206-718-9668? Thanks, John
J
Jeremy Bunn
9 years ago
Featured
To the extent that drug use is a medical pathology, it should be addressed by treatment, not facilitation, and by decriminalization, rather than by local governments engaging in what higher levels of government hold to be illegal activity.
T
Tracy Reimers
9 years ago
Please spend this money on long term rehab beds and mental health beds.
A
Anonymous
9 years ago
Yes ! Safe consumption is still perpetuating the problem - help them get clean !
A
Anonymous
9 years ago
I do not agree that safe drug sites are the answer. Do not use this to solve our Seattle drug problem
S
Steven J Wood
9 years ago
It is time for a recall election.
A
Anonymous
9 years ago
I live downtown and have to say over the few years it's become a drug haven then anytime before . We don't need more drug attic's in our neighborhood !!!
A
Ann Christiansen
9 years ago
Treatment!
S
Stephanie Edwards
9 years ago
We need to be taking a proactive and aggressive approach to our drug epidemic in Seattle. Creating more using spaces, however it is spun, will not be as effective as creating more places to detox and recover. Our dollars should be spent doing the most helpful things, and safe sites are not the best use of our money.
A
Anonymous
9 years ago
The Vancouver program is not working. Why replicate?
A
Anonymous
9 years ago
Vancouver's experience is NOT one to emulate.
G
Gopal Narayanan
9 years ago
Government can give treatment, not drug consumption sites.
J
Jeff
9 years ago
Why the kid-gloves with a "please rethink this"? How about this: f&#k no!! It's beyond time that our elected officials are held accountable by their constituents, rather than the lobby that benefits from addiction and homelessness.
L
Lin Gale
9 years ago
All drugs should be legalized. Watch Michael Moore's movie "Where to Invade Next" to see how this policy cleaned up so many social issues--and other great ideas.
P
Paul Abel
9 years ago
Drug consumption facilty = slippery slope & more government intervention.
R
Ron ald Eber
9 years ago
I support the Speak Out Seattle position as these sites are not proven and much more study is needed. We need prevention and counseling and not just places to shoot up.
J
Jules James
9 years ago
First in the nation! So every substance abuse counsellor and judge in the nation will finally have an option for their unrepentant heroin addict customers: "Move To Seattle!"
D
Darrell McManus
9 years ago
This is just another "Attraction" to bring more junkies to Seattle. The reality is a heroin addict is going to shoot up the first opportunity they can. This is not going to do anything but make things worse.
R
Richard Ries MD
9 years ago
More and better actual treatment. Methadone programs work but need integrated housing and vocational services to enhance recovery
I'm a news reporter with KIRO7 and am interested in an interview with Corri Durant and/or the petition organizer. Can you email me at [email protected], or call me at 206-718-9668? Thanks, John
To the extent that drug use is a medical pathology, it should be addressed by treatment, not facilitation, and by decriminalization, rather than by local governments engaging in what higher levels of government hold to be illegal activity.
Please spend this money on long term rehab beds and mental health beds.
Yes ! Safe consumption is still perpetuating the problem - help them get clean !
I do not agree that safe drug sites are the answer. Do not use this to solve our Seattle drug problem
It is time for a recall election.
I live downtown and have to say over the few years it's become a drug haven then anytime before . We don't need more drug attic's in our neighborhood !!!
Treatment!
We need to be taking a proactive and aggressive approach to our drug epidemic in Seattle. Creating more using spaces, however it is spun, will not be as effective as creating more places to detox and recover. Our dollars should be spent doing the most helpful things, and safe sites are not the best use of our money.
The Vancouver program is not working. Why replicate?
Vancouver's experience is NOT one to emulate.
Government can give treatment, not drug consumption sites.
Why the kid-gloves with a "please rethink this"? How about this: f&#k no!! It's beyond time that our elected officials are held accountable by their constituents, rather than the lobby that benefits from addiction and homelessness.
All drugs should be legalized. Watch Michael Moore's movie "Where to Invade Next" to see how this policy cleaned up so many social issues--and other great ideas.
Drug consumption facilty = slippery slope & more government intervention.
I support the Speak Out Seattle position as these sites are not proven and much more study is needed. We need prevention and counseling and not just places to shoot up.
First in the nation! So every substance abuse counsellor and judge in the nation will finally have an option for their unrepentant heroin addict customers: "Move To Seattle!"
This is just another "Attraction" to bring more junkies to Seattle. The reality is a heroin addict is going to shoot up the first opportunity they can. This is not going to do anything but make things worse.
More and better actual treatment. Methadone programs work but need integrated housing and vocational services to enhance recovery
Recovery, not enabling!