Omitting access to data is not science, its political.
D
Dan Johnston
11 years ago
They obviously arrived at their results by consensus, not science.
D
Dan Johnston
11 years ago
They obviously arrived at their results by consensus, not science.
R
Raymond Kuntz
11 years ago
Use the full data set.
D
Dave Jensen
11 years ago
shameful
D
Dave Jensen
11 years ago
shameful
K
Kathleen McGinley
11 years ago
Misrepresentation indeed, aka...lies and distortions..
K
Kathleen McGinley
11 years ago
Misrepresentation indeed, aka...lies and distortions..
A
Anonymous
11 years ago
If True, this is just one more example of how the policies of President Obama are founded on lies including his Climate Policies.
C
cj orach
11 years ago
If True, this is just one more example of how the policies of President Obama are founded on lies including his Climate Policies.
R
Roland Seguin
11 years ago
It's disgusting that they could call themselves scientists and then sell their souls down the sewer just for more free taxdollar subsidies so they can produce more bogus false studiesand computer programs.
R
Roland Seguin
11 years ago
It's disgusting that they could call themselves scientists and then sell their souls down the sewer just for more free taxdollar subsidies so they can produce more bogus false studiesand computer programs.
K
K. Emerson
11 years ago
Let the truth be known. Truth sets us free.
K
K. Emerson
11 years ago
Let the truth be known. Truth sets us free.
P
Phil Scott
12 years ago
If there's nothing to hide, don't hide it.
C
Christy King
12 years ago
Good cause
D
Dan Rolsma
12 years ago
Apparently NOAA has become a political organization and is no longer primarily a scientific one.
J
Jon Kahler
12 years ago
Using data from models and ignoring actual measurements is fraud. Using tax-payer dollars to fund this fraud makes it even more serious. Such fraud is not committed to advance the science, but to advance a political agenda, and to garner additional tax-payer funding. Congress should investigate this corruption of science by so-called scientists.
Use the full dataset, not the "model"!
Omitting access to data is not science, its political.
They obviously arrived at their results by consensus, not science.
They obviously arrived at their results by consensus, not science.
Use the full data set.
shameful
shameful
Misrepresentation indeed, aka...lies and distortions..
Misrepresentation indeed, aka...lies and distortions..
If True, this is just one more example of how the policies of President Obama are founded on lies including his Climate Policies.
If True, this is just one more example of how the policies of President Obama are founded on lies including his Climate Policies.
It's disgusting that they could call themselves scientists and then sell their souls down the sewer just for more free taxdollar subsidies so they can produce more bogus false studiesand computer programs.
It's disgusting that they could call themselves scientists and then sell their souls down the sewer just for more free taxdollar subsidies so they can produce more bogus false studiesand computer programs.
Let the truth be known. Truth sets us free.
Let the truth be known. Truth sets us free.
If there's nothing to hide, don't hide it.
Good cause
Apparently NOAA has become a political organization and is no longer primarily a scientific one.
Using data from models and ignoring actual measurements is fraud. Using tax-payer dollars to fund this fraud makes it even more serious. Such fraud is not committed to advance the science, but to advance a political agenda, and to garner additional tax-payer funding. Congress should investigate this corruption of science by so-called scientists.
[email protected]