No reputable scientist would intentionaly omit data to make a point. This is unethical.
B
Bernard McCune
12 years ago
There is so much hype in relation to ocean pH. Reliable research based on complete data sets is the alternative to the hype.
C
Charles Wagner
12 years ago
Using model outputs instead of actual measurments does not make any sense. And the bad data feeds the alarmists.
E
Edward Burlbaw
12 years ago
Follow the money. The ocean ph fraud must stop.
D
Don Veazey
12 years ago
NOAA has become a disgrace. A simple pawn of the One World Movement abd Agebda 21. Shame.
D
David Tofsted
12 years ago
This data is imperative to produce a meaningful and complete understanding of our world.
R
Raymond Kuntz
12 years ago
Use the full data set.
M
Michael Moon
12 years ago
Feeley = Phraud, this is worse than the Whiskey Creek oyster abomination. He is doing what Boss Obummer told him to do, but it is not science...
A
Anthony Watts
12 years ago
Omitting access to data is not science, its political.
D
Darrell E Johnson
12 years ago
Use the full dataset, not the "model"!
B
Brian Noury
12 years ago
This is unethical and destroys scientific credability.
J
Joel Black
12 years ago
Let's agree that where facts are available, models are not to be used.
J
John K. Sutherland.
12 years ago
Truth in science should be demanded.
S
Stephen Carousso
12 years ago
stop the fraud
R
Richard Rounds
12 years ago
Science must account for all available data.
D
Don Veazey
12 years ago
PHraud Gate. The fix is in and science suffers.
M
michael j muller
12 years ago
real world data is significantly more important than modelling.
S
Stephane Rogeau
12 years ago
If there is nothing to hide, then show the data...
R
Robert Endlich
12 years ago
Featured
In compiling a time series history for analysis, it is necessary to have a good, calibrated, and validated set of measurements. NOAA has engaged in fraud in using model output of ocean pH instead of measurements. Restore the ocean pH measurements.
End the PHraud!
No reputable scientist would intentionaly omit data to make a point. This is unethical.
There is so much hype in relation to ocean pH. Reliable research based on complete data sets is the alternative to the hype.
Using model outputs instead of actual measurments does not make any sense. And the bad data feeds the alarmists.
Follow the money. The ocean ph fraud must stop.
NOAA has become a disgrace. A simple pawn of the One World Movement abd Agebda 21. Shame.
This data is imperative to produce a meaningful and complete understanding of our world.
Use the full data set.
Feeley = Phraud, this is worse than the Whiskey Creek oyster abomination. He is doing what Boss Obummer told him to do, but it is not science...
Omitting access to data is not science, its political.
Use the full dataset, not the "model"!
This is unethical and destroys scientific credability.
Let's agree that where facts are available, models are not to be used.
Truth in science should be demanded.
stop the fraud
Science must account for all available data.
PHraud Gate. The fix is in and science suffers.
real world data is significantly more important than modelling.
If there is nothing to hide, then show the data...
In compiling a time series history for analysis, it is necessary to have a good, calibrated, and validated set of measurements. NOAA has engaged in fraud in using model output of ocean pH instead of measurements. Restore the ocean pH measurements.