Don’t do it. We are a smal town and pay high tax dollars!
C
Carol Buccheri
8 years ago
Totally agree!
J
John M Reilly
8 years ago
I am also opposed to this proposal because these types of lights are harmful to the birds.
D
Doug Smith
8 years ago
No
J
Jill Miller
8 years ago
This will be a devastation to the neighborhoods property values.
This will allow for additional traffic as well as noise in an area that already has this issue.
A
Anonymous
8 years ago
Strongly opposed to the lights
I
Ivan Mironchuk
8 years ago
I am not against the majority of the proposal by Concordia, the lights being the exception. I understand that the lighting proposed will not have significant "glare" or "light spill".
My main concerns are the aesthetics of having multiple 60' tall permanent structures. I also have concerns about the amount of usage these lights will have if the college ends up renting the field to other organizations.
L
Lisa Drake
8 years ago
These lights are not needed and will negatively impact our neighborhood.
Gifford Street Resident
R
Robert Pisano
8 years ago
I vote against the stadium lights.
M
Michael Santoliquido
8 years ago
When Eastchester installed lights on Handle Field it increased traffic on Fairway Drive dramatically at all hours. We are able to see the lights and poles from our house. For them to say the lights will not effect the neighboring homes is absurd. The poles are unsightly, the lights are too bright, the games are too loud at night and the increased traffic are reasons enough to not approve this application.
N
Noel d'Ablemont
8 years ago
Please do not allow lights in our beautiful small community.
M
Micheal Denning
8 years ago
Fields are beautiful and don't get lots of fun play. Don't see the need for lights
W
William Nealis
8 years ago
Really will take away from neighborhood feel.
K
Kristen Duncan
8 years ago
Tuckahoe resident
J
Joseph Larkin
8 years ago
Not needed or wanted
M
Michael Berlin
8 years ago
60 foot poles, bright lights, noise, and crowds are not what we need or want in our neighborhood.
I
isabelle fuller
8 years ago
The proposal does not fit the character of the area
D
David Lyons
8 years ago
I see directly onto the field. The redoing of the feild, Do It!! Love watching the games from my office BUT, Lights, NO WAY!! They will always be visible and I believe that its a detriment to the neighborhood.
Your 9 hours a week is just a start. Never going to be so simple. Baseball and tennis don't have lights and you are also painting lines on the new field for lacrosse, You don't have a team. I will fight this...
J
Josh Rucci
8 years ago
Featured
Agree the 60-ft installation wholly unnecessary and will be detrimental to neighbors and property values. Also believe the college lacked transparency in failing to inform the surrounding communities of their plan, especially considering the considerable support the college receives from surrounding communities and neighbors.
A
Anonymous
8 years ago
These would damage home values and would disturb the peaceful residential around the lights . It's unnecessary. Please stop this proposal.
Don’t do it. We are a smal town and pay high tax dollars!
Totally agree!
I am also opposed to this proposal because these types of lights are harmful to the birds.
No
This will be a devastation to the neighborhoods property values. This will allow for additional traffic as well as noise in an area that already has this issue.
Strongly opposed to the lights
I am not against the majority of the proposal by Concordia, the lights being the exception. I understand that the lighting proposed will not have significant "glare" or "light spill". My main concerns are the aesthetics of having multiple 60' tall permanent structures. I also have concerns about the amount of usage these lights will have if the college ends up renting the field to other organizations.
These lights are not needed and will negatively impact our neighborhood. Gifford Street Resident
I vote against the stadium lights.
When Eastchester installed lights on Handle Field it increased traffic on Fairway Drive dramatically at all hours. We are able to see the lights and poles from our house. For them to say the lights will not effect the neighboring homes is absurd. The poles are unsightly, the lights are too bright, the games are too loud at night and the increased traffic are reasons enough to not approve this application.
Please do not allow lights in our beautiful small community.
Fields are beautiful and don't get lots of fun play. Don't see the need for lights
Really will take away from neighborhood feel.
Tuckahoe resident
Not needed or wanted
60 foot poles, bright lights, noise, and crowds are not what we need or want in our neighborhood.
The proposal does not fit the character of the area
I see directly onto the field. The redoing of the feild, Do It!! Love watching the games from my office BUT, Lights, NO WAY!! They will always be visible and I believe that its a detriment to the neighborhood. Your 9 hours a week is just a start. Never going to be so simple. Baseball and tennis don't have lights and you are also painting lines on the new field for lacrosse, You don't have a team. I will fight this...
Agree the 60-ft installation wholly unnecessary and will be detrimental to neighbors and property values. Also believe the college lacked transparency in failing to inform the surrounding communities of their plan, especially considering the considerable support the college receives from surrounding communities and neighbors.
These would damage home values and would disturb the peaceful residential around the lights . It's unnecessary. Please stop this proposal.