Skip to main content

Residents Against Cwm Isaf

102 Comments

T
Tom Rhodes
7 years ago

Roads serving Efail Isaf are already overloaded together with G.Ps and local schools. This size of development is not sustainable

D
david thomas
7 years ago

the by pass is not fit for purpose already exceptionally busy at peak times a further influx of housing would exacerbate the problem , additionally the road to Creigiau is totally unsuitable for the current usage the housing development senvisaged would make it a danger ous road to travel at any time There are not enough doctors in the area to satisfy current demand where will the addditional numbers come from

G
Gareth arnold
7 years ago

The schools, local surgeries and roads are at saturation point already more houses cannot be justified.

S
Sian smith
7 years ago

It should not be done leave some green space

D
Dawn sandor
7 years ago

Not enough doctors to cover the whole area . to many pupils in class. The bye pass isn't efficient for its purpose

M
Michelle Davies
7 years ago

Please don’t spoil another green area

S
Steve Gregory
7 years ago

This is unacceptable

K
Kathryn Thomas
7 years ago

I object to the new estate. Vehicles are gridlocked on the bypass which will make our village congested! No more houses until Roafs and schools are sorted

B
Brandon Williams
7 years ago

Stop over development

J
Joan Smith
7 years ago Featured

This development would double the size of the village. I'm not against small developments. The roads, local doctors surgeries, schools could not cope with a development of this size in Efail Isaf.

A
Anonymous
7 years ago

Air pollution already too high Congestion Lack of infrastructure

A
Anonymous
7 years ago

I am against any further house building in the parish.

D
Deborah Radford
7 years ago

No more houses needed at all, the schools can’t cope, the doctors surgeries can’t cope. No more houses

C
Cath King
7 years ago

The local infrastructure cannot cope. Gwauncelyn & Tonteg children are already being squeezed out of their community. Please no more houses!

R
Rebecca iddon
7 years ago

This development is not necessary to local economy and destroys neighbouring schooling communities and catchment areas

M
Margaret Prescott
7 years ago

The present infrastructure cannot support another 350 families.

D
Darren Lewis
7 years ago

The road infrastructure is not in place to cope with these extra homes causing chaos with standstills along the bypass in either direction and so raises health concerns due to increased pollution.

A
Allie Price
7 years ago

I strongly object against the proposal the road infrastructure cannot cope with this development.

A
Anonymous
7 years ago

This will put in due pressure on an already strained road and travel network.

R
Rebecca Parker
7 years ago

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-47213633