Skip to main content

Residents Against Apartments at Sprayberry Crossing

994 Comments

J
Jeff malloy
6 years ago

Oak Creek Estates

L
Lynn Key
6 years ago

Love to have the area redone but do not want apartments!!!

A
Adie Noren
6 years ago

Crystal Downs

M
Melissa Ray
6 years ago

Nowlin Acres Subdivision

L
Lydia Lawrence
6 years ago

Lydia Lawrence Autumn Lake subdivision

L
Lydia Lawrence
6 years ago

apartments will have a negative impact on infrastructure-water and sewage, not to forget traffic

C
Cyndi Jackson
6 years ago

No apartments!

T
Todd Anderson
6 years ago

Opposed to high density apartments in this great area, it's just not a fit to the area. Please reconsider the plan. Hickory Woods Subdivision

C
Christine
6 years ago

Remington Glen subdivision. No apartment rentals.

J
Jeffrey Madewell
6 years ago

Tremont Subdivision

D
Donald Y Joe
6 years ago

No apartments!

A
Alisa Rusk
6 years ago

We do not want this

J
Jason A Rusk
6 years ago

Lived here 35 years, it's a blight, but we do not want this built in our community. Especially around the cemetery.

P
Philippe Michaud
6 years ago

Way too much leasing rental content!

J
John LaVoy
6 years ago

This project goes against the planned use map! Apartments are out of place here and unwanted! This type of project would set a bad precedent! We DONT WANT this area to end up looking like Smyrna!!!! This area is rural and needs to reflect that lifestyle, that's why the residents moved there and live there!!! The urban garbage style can set up shop elsewhere. Elder living is acceptable! But NOT transient apartment dwellers in this area, there a "planned use map" areas for that need and that's where that needs to go. DO NOT get mesmerized by drawings.

C
Charles Noren
6 years ago

Crystal Downs

K
Kelsey Wiley
6 years ago

Pope Manor

D
Daryl Brace
6 years ago

East Park

A
Ansley Nichols
6 years ago

East Cedar Forks. 5 stories is too much for this area.

D
David Brouillette
6 years ago

Blackwell Chase