Skip to main content

Rescue Candlewood Mountain

169 Comments

B
bruce willett
8 years ago

Does it really make sense to cut 60+ acres for this? Must be large roof areas, quarries, brownfield that would be more suitable!

V
Vincent Abeyta
8 years ago

The proposed lack of oversight is shameful. This is especially true when one considers all the requirements on individual residents vis-a-vis buliding permits and zoning regulations for the simplest of activities. Additionally, the tax abatement in the current state fiscal situation and the effect this will have on towns is absurd.

L
lori kelly
8 years ago

i'm all for green energy but there has be a better way

A
Anonymous
8 years ago

There is no need for tax cuts for a sustainable profitable farm such as this. Green energy is great but not with the tax cut

E
Elizabeth Herberick
8 years ago

There is a better way! Do not clear cut 70 acres of core forest and farmland! Save the earth and rescue Candlewood Mountain

B
Beth Parks
8 years ago

Ridiculous idea, why does everyone want to ruin our beautiful land. Mother earth is weeping! Wake up and treat your planet like the precious thing it is!

C
Caitlin Lewis
8 years ago

No no no !!!!

J
John Henkel
8 years ago

No way! We don t need this on Candlewood Mountain!

T
Tracee Sutton-Wells
8 years ago

I am against clear cutting Candlewood Mtn. for the profit of a company in Mass. "NO! to what would be an eye sore!"

A
Aura Showah
8 years ago

Do not destroy Candlewood MT!!

P
peter donato
8 years ago

I HAVE SEEN CLEAR CUTTING IN WASHINGTON STATE . CHECK WHAT IT LOOKS ON THE WEB.

L
linda townsend
8 years ago

Save candlewood mtn.

I
Ivan Becker
8 years ago

No more destruction.

P
Peter deHahn
8 years ago

This project needs a full impact study as well as response as to why and how it got such a under the table "sweetheart deal" with the Mayer $ and town council $$$$ Not to mention the fact that there are many properties that are clear already and stand much less chance of causing serious problems like erosion and negative effects on area wells and water quality.

V
Victoria Freund
8 years ago

Keep it all forest. It's better for the lake.

G
Gay weathered
8 years ago

This is not the "good solar" that will offset our power costs and power our area. We will receive NO benefits from this. It's all about big business.

M
Mark
8 years ago

very short-sighted, bad idea. from a New Milford property owner.

J
Joanne Reynolds
8 years ago

This plan does not support Candlewood Mountain, New Milford, or even the state of CT. As a resident of Candlewood Mountain, there are better locations which are already clear which could be utilized to support a solar farm. There is no value added to the residents of New Milford by placing this in the proposed location. A full environmental assessment must be provided, including the impact on CO2 scrubbed by 80 acres per year vs. what this plan offers, the habitat of not only the bald eagles that nest on Candlewood Lake, but the deer and turkey which legally feed our family throughout the year, the mountain residents live upon well water and we have not seen what this plan would do not only to the water table, but the quality of our water. There needs to be more thoughtful consideration of the long-term impact of this project vs. short-term monetary gain for very few.

T
Tracy O'Connell
8 years ago

I oppose the solar project.

J
John ciccimarro
8 years ago

Just say no!