Skip to main content

Restore Edmonton's Democracy: Rescind. Rethink. Redo

1,999 Comments

K
Kimberly Thoms
1 year ago

Supportive housing locations need better vetting for appropriateness & suitability.

R
Ronald S Horjus
1 year ago

Lack of infrastructure, especially parking, causes issues.

R
reesa maria john
1 year ago

consider the existent residents who make up your taxi base - i do not support infill

A
Anonymous
1 year ago

It’s the parking and the noise. Also the waste management is complex and problematic.

H
Hien Huynh
1 year ago

I think the allownance of multiple units esp over three (at time up to 8) in normal house footprint is unacceptable and will creat over crowding and those streets.

C
Christopher Mackay
1 year ago

Current bylaw regarding infill is for the benefit of developers to the detriment of the quality of life in Edmonton. More local input and control!

A
Anonymous Canada
1 year ago

It used to be a quiet , safe and pleasant community in our neighborhood, but sadly, it no longer is. You used to know your neighbors well, but now the next house is built to 4 units, and rented out for second floor (3 units) and basement (1 unit) separately. Worst of all, another additional unit will be built by tearing down its rear garage. This is now despicably a money- making business at the expense of all single house owners. It totally and ignorantly neglects the risk of fire hazards in our local community. Unjustifiably, it drastically depreciates the value of our single house in our neighborhoods. This idiotic and inconsiderate by-law must be abrogated immediately.

A
Anonymous
1 year ago

This is long over due. Our oldest neighborhoods were not meant for so many people and cars Brings our property value down having warehouse type housing in the neighborhood. Keep them to the busy roads and away from quiet residential

J
John Middleton
1 year ago

What a horrible zoning by law. The city counsellors that can concocted this should be removed from office.

M
Mary Lou Neufeld
1 year ago

Restore Accountability to Edmonton's Rezoning

A
Anonymous
1 year ago

How is it progress to replace a single family home that rented for $2000/mo with 8 mini-suites renting for $2400/mo? Stop throwing families under the bus to appease developers' profits.

J
Joseph Spelliscy
1 year ago

Fully support this call to action

W
William Burtenshaw
1 year ago

Totally agree that the new zoning is not conducive to homeowners, but is only for the benefit of developers! Seems like council is purposely trying to ruin neighborhoods!!

D
Diane Millar
1 year ago

Any development application wanting to more than triple existing density on any given lot must be looked at in the context of the block it’s on at the very least. Are the streets narrow? Is it a cul-de-sac? Is traffic and parking already challenged? Can the infrastructure handle the increase? Do the neighbours have solar panels that will be rendered useless? No one wants to buy into a neighborhood where anything at all could replace the house next door. At least in the suburbs you know how it will be for the foreseeable future. Any rewriting needs to also include minimal “green” requirements like solar panels.

E
Eugene Silva
1 year ago

The new zoning bylaw is an all out assault on established mature neighborhoods. It must be changed before more violence is committed against the residents.

J
James Rockey
1 year ago

Council needs to hear our voices that responsible densification is needed.

R
Rebecca Acheson
1 year ago

Feeling discouraged and powerless to the irreversible changes to my cherished neighborhood:(

E
Ernest Cavaliere
1 year ago

One of the worst decisions ever. Ruining our mature neighborhoods. Needs to be limits.

B
Bernhard Martens
1 year ago

The proposed construction on 97 Ave is way beyond what is good for the neighborhood

D
Donald Scott Millar
1 year ago

Common sense matters in making infill construction positive in a neighborhood