I want to have a well planned solution to meet the housing needs. Simply jamming in high density housing in the neighborhood is a poor plan.
W
Wendy Leslie
21 days ago
Infill coming soon next door
T
Trish Sala
21 days ago
The poor planning in regards to drainage/sewer/water systems with the addition of 24 new units in one block north of 100th Ave is reprehensible. There have been multiple failures in the water management system with associated flooding, road closures and damage to properties in the area. This is not sustainable.
R
Rayanne Haines
21 days ago
I live in the Hollywood neighbourhood, which is seeing significant development. I support appropriate infill development however I’m seeing eight and six plexes built between small homes (with no garages). Street parking is becoming overcrowded and unsafe for children in the neighborhood.
B
Brian Koester
21 days ago
Develop your damn density on the airport lands - Blatchford or between 102 ave and 104 ave on Stony Plain road or University of Alberta Farm land in city Limits - NOT with 8 plexes in Neighborhoods zoned RF1 for 80+ years!!! You are destroying the fabric of established neighborhoods, for shame.
J
Jennifer Delorme
21 days ago
Because there are better options to build leaving single family homes as is. Destroying neighbouring homes is not proper planning.
L
Lane Borstad
21 days ago
The chase for developer profit is destroying existing neighborhoods and stressing infrastructure.
C
Carol Malko
21 days ago
This is lowering property values if not done with consideration of the streets that are allowing an 8plex in between 2 single family homes. Parking has already been an issue. The multi family dwellings should be built on bus routes and major streets and thorough ways, not in the midst of a street that pays higher taxes and as we have paid for street light improvements to beautify their street and improve property values, a developer can put what ever they want, with 0 architectural guidelines
K
Kim Mccurdy
21 days ago
Because I don’t think that our Tax paying money is going to, it should be throughout the city. These infills in the city are not looking out for the best interest of the current owners surrounding the home. They need to start building them as we do not need any more density in the mature areas. It’s ruining landscape of these beautiful communities. It’s blocking sunlight from surrounding homes, bringing them renters here it is the majority of home owners. The builders are not being responsible
T
Terry Herchek
21 days ago
Stop ruining mature neighborhoods.
J
Jay Thiessen
22 days ago
It is our homes and destruction of our community is not an option. We bought in this community for the reason of a home not for transients
C
Corey Stroeder
22 days ago
8 rental units on each lot is unsustainable development that benefits no one.
S
Scott Sugden
22 days ago
Our house it at risk to be next to two Infills.
J
Jill D
22 days ago
I want to protect our communities and our investment
S
Simon Johnson
22 days ago
Edmonton city councilors are not acting for their constituents!!
M
Marilyn Robb
22 days ago
I am very sad about the neighbourhood destruction and loss of years old trees.
A
Amy Ryniak
22 days ago
Preserve sufficient sunlight and fresh air reaching surrounding properties/dwellings. What happened to green spaces/trees?!? Neighbourhoods should have a say regarding development in their own neighbourhood - meaningful community consultation. Property value - often negatively impacted by infills, particularly when greater than 2 stories. Parking - there should be a minimum # of stalls, shouldn’t negatively impact surrounding properties/community league parking.
M
Morrie Smith
22 days ago
I support ethical infill. What we are facing in Edmonton is an unethical predatory takeover of our neighborhoods with massive poorly constructed multiplexes.
M
Mark Poitras
22 days ago
Totally understand they need density but they are destroying neighbourhood. Glad to help fighting to revisit the bylaw.
K
Karen Oko
22 days ago
This bylaws most be reversed in so many ways from rethinking number of units allowed in infills to reviewing what can blindly be put in a corner lot.
Homeowners are the ones who make the sacrifice.
I want to have a well planned solution to meet the housing needs. Simply jamming in high density housing in the neighborhood is a poor plan.
Infill coming soon next door
The poor planning in regards to drainage/sewer/water systems with the addition of 24 new units in one block north of 100th Ave is reprehensible. There have been multiple failures in the water management system with associated flooding, road closures and damage to properties in the area. This is not sustainable.
I live in the Hollywood neighbourhood, which is seeing significant development. I support appropriate infill development however I’m seeing eight and six plexes built between small homes (with no garages). Street parking is becoming overcrowded and unsafe for children in the neighborhood.
Develop your damn density on the airport lands - Blatchford or between 102 ave and 104 ave on Stony Plain road or University of Alberta Farm land in city Limits - NOT with 8 plexes in Neighborhoods zoned RF1 for 80+ years!!! You are destroying the fabric of established neighborhoods, for shame.
Because there are better options to build leaving single family homes as is. Destroying neighbouring homes is not proper planning.
The chase for developer profit is destroying existing neighborhoods and stressing infrastructure.
This is lowering property values if not done with consideration of the streets that are allowing an 8plex in between 2 single family homes. Parking has already been an issue. The multi family dwellings should be built on bus routes and major streets and thorough ways, not in the midst of a street that pays higher taxes and as we have paid for street light improvements to beautify their street and improve property values, a developer can put what ever they want, with 0 architectural guidelines
Because I don’t think that our Tax paying money is going to, it should be throughout the city. These infills in the city are not looking out for the best interest of the current owners surrounding the home. They need to start building them as we do not need any more density in the mature areas. It’s ruining landscape of these beautiful communities. It’s blocking sunlight from surrounding homes, bringing them renters here it is the majority of home owners. The builders are not being responsible
Stop ruining mature neighborhoods.
It is our homes and destruction of our community is not an option. We bought in this community for the reason of a home not for transients
8 rental units on each lot is unsustainable development that benefits no one.
Our house it at risk to be next to two Infills.
I want to protect our communities and our investment
Edmonton city councilors are not acting for their constituents!!
I am very sad about the neighbourhood destruction and loss of years old trees.
Preserve sufficient sunlight and fresh air reaching surrounding properties/dwellings. What happened to green spaces/trees?!? Neighbourhoods should have a say regarding development in their own neighbourhood - meaningful community consultation. Property value - often negatively impacted by infills, particularly when greater than 2 stories. Parking - there should be a minimum # of stalls, shouldn’t negatively impact surrounding properties/community league parking.
I support ethical infill. What we are facing in Edmonton is an unethical predatory takeover of our neighborhoods with massive poorly constructed multiplexes.
Totally understand they need density but they are destroying neighbourhood. Glad to help fighting to revisit the bylaw.
This bylaws most be reversed in so many ways from rethinking number of units allowed in infills to reviewing what can blindly be put in a corner lot. Homeowners are the ones who make the sacrifice.