Skip to main content

Restore Edmonton's Democracy: Rescind. Rethink. Redo

2,187 Comments

J
Jeff Fillion Verified
22 days ago

These infill changes are a big concern for established neighborhoods

D
Dianne Pechler Verified
23 days ago

Infill in neighborhoods with already cramped parking is wrong. The amt of garbage bins and trash exposure is unacceptable!

O
Olivia Bergeron Verified
23 days ago

Too many units on a lot.. no parking ..Increased traffic , loss of sun, no privacy .. many garbage cans … so called developers hire people who do not have proper certification or knowledge.. infrastructure not able to support such builds and this is not the developers problem .. it falls on us the tax payers … these are rentals .. therefore no pride in ownership

M
Marilyn White Verified
23 days ago

Mature neighborhoods are the core of any city .Destroying the peace and tranquility of these neighborhoods is wrong . Stop this irresponsible infill building . It profits no one but the developers.

G
Gary Ball Verified
23 days ago

Government has lost sight of the basic ideals and common sense that makes our cites and country great.

G
Glenn Matich Verified
23 days ago

I live in Bonnie Doon, and infill is out of control.

R
Richard Ogle Verified
23 days ago

The zoning change is degrading my quality of life.

G
Greg Pretzlaff Verified
23 days ago

We need to take back control of our City Council to make them representative of the constituents rather than minions of the Federal Liberal Party and the WEF.

J
james barlow Verified
23 days ago

destruction of neiborhood / STOP

M
Manjinder Deol Verified
23 days ago

Infills have no parking lots roads will be full city does not care

S
Stephen Droeske Verified
23 days ago

There is an eight unit infill being built at the end of our street. Eight unit with no parking. The streets are all ready full at night with overnight parking.

R
Rick Needham Verified
24 days ago

It’s just not right for our mature neighborhood to be over run by infill and poorly educated aldermen and mayor and looking for a scapegoat to plan their poor planning for the last 5 years

K
Kerry McElroy Verified
24 days ago

Infill with more than a duplex built in older neighborhoods that no one's wants gives me panic attacks.

T
Therese Moquin Verified
24 days ago

To preserve nature and maintain a more human and pleasant neighbourhood.

T
Terry Martin Verified
24 days ago

City council needs to hear how, why and when Edmontonians feel/think infill projects need regulations to mitigate harm to our neighborhoods.

S
Supporter Verified
25 days ago

We live in Hazeldean and we're absolutely ok with new development including duplex and some of the other housing..what we do object to is lack of foresight allowing 8 and 12 Plex housing..often next to an older single family home with no planning for parking. There have been concerns regarding poor drainage..quality of construction is poor. Please city councillors limit further development.

J
John Tymchyshyn Verified
25 days ago

The direction this and past city council has done and is continuing to do regarding changing the zoning for the “infills “ is totally wrong!! City administration is just as bad and wrong as council!! Let have an infill built beside our ward alder person (Keren Tang) and see how fast she lists her property for sale. Time for massive changes!! We need residential neighborhoods not multiplex neighborhoods.

C
Candace F Verified
26 days ago

The city council needs to atart LISTENING to its constituents rather than ignoring the masses to appease their pet projects!

D
Douglas Fonteyne Verified
26 days ago

City council has zero accountability - what was once a nice city with neighborhoods with green spaces and reasonable development is being ruined - meanwhile developments such as Blatchford go u dear developed due to crazy building requirements

C
Carmelle Workun Verified
26 days ago

I I believe in responsible urban growth not in anything is allowed which is what we have now. Council should be consulting and listening to people living in the communities.