Controlled planned neighborhood density and responsible parking allotment
L
Leanne Stein
10 days ago
Safe communities that are not overcrowded. Infrastructure cannot handle the strain of multi units in a single family neighborhood.
M
Mark Stein
10 days ago
Protect our mature neighborhoods and hard worked for lifestyle to raise Families in communities that care about each other.
G
Gary Cowley
10 days ago
Parking issue's and crowding existing homes
P
Paul McKeown
10 days ago
Tired of the apparent absolute control developers have over city council. Disgusted with city council clowns thinking it's ok to permit the installation of hideous rental 8-plex’s on a property meant for a single family residence thus trashing the values of the homes adjacent to these eyesores. And now Shituate wants to install a potential 24+ slum rental at 50 st and 106 ave. The fact that this bizarre notion could even be considered clearly shows in who's pocket our councillors live.
B
Brianna Foster
11 days ago
I have infills going up all around me. It’s very upsetting. 3-4 plexes with suites are eye sores (8 garbage/ recycle bins) less mature trees and green space, a lack of parking.
S
Silvia Sgaramella
11 days ago
It's concerning that development is not regulated in a way that's sustainable for everyone, and that as a result, the city will be more congested and properties are losing their value. Especially in older neighbourhoods, the infrastructure doesn't allow for this type of buildings and more people. It can be a serious issue for the sewer system that will be overworked with too many people, while it's not designed to accommodate for such numbers.
C
Catherine Caufield
11 days ago
An 8-plex *has been approved* for a 48ft frontage (624m2) lot right beside me (11511 73Av NW (Belgravia)
D
Dale Cook
11 days ago
I’m against this infilled homes
They take up all the parking on the road
Can’t have friends or family come over
No place to park
S
Sean Moir
12 days ago
Infill to a maximum of 3 units (in total), with 50% of parking accommodated on the lot is acceptable; the current situation is not.
L
Lia Notte
12 days ago
Listen to the people
M
Marie HARTFELDER
12 days ago
to high of density for communities to function
propperly!
E
Elizabeth Mallard
12 days ago
Live in 1908 home in the beautiful community of Montrose. So many lots are larger and lovely homes from the 1930+. Our trees alone are worth buying here. My lots was rates for 12 units at one time. Absurd. Why can’t new generations of children have big beautiful safe yards to play in. History demolished for these hideous two story with basement suite and garden suite. Also the planning should include creating more livable places for the aging to free up their homes while keeping the aging.
M
Marilyn Petrillo
12 days ago
The city is letting some builders profit greatly off the backs of hard working home owners by turning established neighborhoods into unsightly monstrosities. The original style of an infill was fine(up to 4 plex) but not a 3 level 8 plex jammed onto a single family plot with no room for parking for that many units.
S
Sarah Stevenson
13 days ago
The loss of grass, flowers, trees, shrubs makes neighbourhoods look like the concrete jungle that is our downtown. It's completely irresponsible to allow what is happening. A duplex or two skinnies is one thing, an 8-plex is quite another.
N
Nichola Wilson
13 days ago
I am concerned that the current zoning bylaws could negatively impact my mature neighbourhood and quality of life through reduced natural light, increased traffic congestion, and changes to its established character. Homeowners invest huge amounts of time, money and effort into their homes and communities. I want to feel confident that future development respects the neighbourhood and protects property values.
C
Christian Stupak
13 days ago
I am against dense infills that hurt the character of neighbourhoods
R
Raine Turner
13 days ago
Pissed off and the city member of council IS a realtor in my area- ELMWOOD-- and SHE is supporting these large builds-- and she also has a construction company- SHE LIED
G
Gabriela Cehovska
14 days ago
I live here, I pay taxes here and I have a house in a mature neighbourhood. Can’t stand the city arrogance and open corruption.
Harmful to neighborhoods.
Controlled planned neighborhood density and responsible parking allotment
Safe communities that are not overcrowded. Infrastructure cannot handle the strain of multi units in a single family neighborhood.
Protect our mature neighborhoods and hard worked for lifestyle to raise Families in communities that care about each other.
Parking issue's and crowding existing homes
Tired of the apparent absolute control developers have over city council. Disgusted with city council clowns thinking it's ok to permit the installation of hideous rental 8-plex’s on a property meant for a single family residence thus trashing the values of the homes adjacent to these eyesores. And now Shituate wants to install a potential 24+ slum rental at 50 st and 106 ave. The fact that this bizarre notion could even be considered clearly shows in who's pocket our councillors live.
I have infills going up all around me. It’s very upsetting. 3-4 plexes with suites are eye sores (8 garbage/ recycle bins) less mature trees and green space, a lack of parking.
It's concerning that development is not regulated in a way that's sustainable for everyone, and that as a result, the city will be more congested and properties are losing their value. Especially in older neighbourhoods, the infrastructure doesn't allow for this type of buildings and more people. It can be a serious issue for the sewer system that will be overworked with too many people, while it's not designed to accommodate for such numbers.
An 8-plex *has been approved* for a 48ft frontage (624m2) lot right beside me (11511 73Av NW (Belgravia)
I’m against this infilled homes They take up all the parking on the road Can’t have friends or family come over No place to park
Infill to a maximum of 3 units (in total), with 50% of parking accommodated on the lot is acceptable; the current situation is not.
Listen to the people
to high of density for communities to function propperly!
Live in 1908 home in the beautiful community of Montrose. So many lots are larger and lovely homes from the 1930+. Our trees alone are worth buying here. My lots was rates for 12 units at one time. Absurd. Why can’t new generations of children have big beautiful safe yards to play in. History demolished for these hideous two story with basement suite and garden suite. Also the planning should include creating more livable places for the aging to free up their homes while keeping the aging.
The city is letting some builders profit greatly off the backs of hard working home owners by turning established neighborhoods into unsightly monstrosities. The original style of an infill was fine(up to 4 plex) but not a 3 level 8 plex jammed onto a single family plot with no room for parking for that many units.
The loss of grass, flowers, trees, shrubs makes neighbourhoods look like the concrete jungle that is our downtown. It's completely irresponsible to allow what is happening. A duplex or two skinnies is one thing, an 8-plex is quite another.
I am concerned that the current zoning bylaws could negatively impact my mature neighbourhood and quality of life through reduced natural light, increased traffic congestion, and changes to its established character. Homeowners invest huge amounts of time, money and effort into their homes and communities. I want to feel confident that future development respects the neighbourhood and protects property values.
I am against dense infills that hurt the character of neighbourhoods
Pissed off and the city member of council IS a realtor in my area- ELMWOOD-- and SHE is supporting these large builds-- and she also has a construction company- SHE LIED
I live here, I pay taxes here and I have a house in a mature neighbourhood. Can’t stand the city arrogance and open corruption.