Skip to main content

Restore Edmonton's Democracy: Rescind. Rethink. Redo

2,188 Comments

M
Marlena Wyman Verified
2 months ago

We are sliding into an era where the mad rush to build more housing puts Edmonton at risk of uglification and the flattening of the complex character and identity of our city. This will lead to lack of livablity and erasure of civic pride. More housing can and must be accomplished, but only as thoughtfully, carefully, and gently as possible, not through headlong force.

J
Judy Hennig Verified
2 months ago

Experiencing a property next door that was purchased for infill. It has sat empty for 2-1/2 years and is the magnet for drug dealers, the homeless and rodent infestation. In speaking to our city council representative on numerous occasions, we have not been given honesty or transparency about the zoning in this neighborhood. The city is not listening to it’s taxpayers and assumes no responsibility for the effects of this chaos.

E
Erna Dominey Verified
2 months ago

My street is being overwhelmed by big ugly black and white boxes.

J
Jane Miska Verified
2 months ago

I live in Wedgewood and our city council recently sold a parcel of land in our neighborhood to Treaty 8 for development of affordable housing. We have no regular bus service with no easily accessible social services so really confused as to how this site makes sense. There is only one way in and out of our neighborhood and the development (that we have seen so far) has not planned for enough parking for the increased population.

T
Teresa Sturgess Verified
2 months ago

I support density but not multiplex beyond 4 units. Parking MUST be considered on the building site. We are a winter city & street parking is too challenging.

R
Richard Riddle Verified
2 months ago

These buildings are too big and just don’t work in the neighborhoods.

L
Laura Culham Verified
2 months ago

We have a property in Grovenor which is being highly developed. We had plans to build a beautiful single family home and now are considering moving and investkng in another community.

K
Kristina Holland Verified
2 months ago

This is destroying our neighborhoods. Long term tax paying people are being forced out of their homes. 16 plex where 1 family home sat Absolutely ridiculous

E
Evan Duffy Verified
2 months ago

This has to happen. This council is destroying our city.

M
Margaret Henley Verified
2 months ago

This city is ruining the beautiful neighbourhoods by infilling everywhere.

M
Mitch Zorich Verified
2 months ago

I believe what Edmonton Neighborhoods United has outlined here is exactly how the City of Edmonton should have approached the Zoning Bylaw 20001.

S
Shelley Blair Verified
2 months ago

Stop destroying our mature neighborhoods

J
Joanna Huck Verified
2 months ago

I want my neighbourhood to be a safe and functional place to raise my children.

S
Sonia Atkin Verified
2 months ago

To maintain the heritage and beauty of old neighborhoods. Building multi family dewellings where a single home used to reside on a 33 foot lot will turn these neighborhoods into Compton!

N
Nancy Davis Verified
2 months ago

Responsible infill is acceptable and encouraged so long as it is providing affordable housing. However, the current trend is to approve large multi dwelling units on, what were previously single-family lots, with little consideration for parking and impact on the community in terms of garbage collection, etc.

P
Paul Martin Verified
2 months ago

Because the mayor said what happened in Crestwood couldn’t happen next to me…and it for damn sure is happening!

C
Cheryl L Verified
2 months ago

Let's do densification right.

S
Stacie ChevrefilsBrummet Verified
2 months ago

Esthetic and functionality of our beautiful neighborhoods are being compromised for what seems like greed.

S
Sarah Kliparchuk Verified
2 months ago

Very concerned about putting 8 plexes in single family dwelling neighbourhoods without providing adequate off street parking. These monster buildings do not fit in with existing infrastructure:

R
Robert McAlear Verified
2 months ago

I’m signing out of profound concern of the recklessness of Bylaw20001.