Having nina teicholz&other truly independent experts is the only way to get good nutritional advice.
This group has zero credibility without people like nina.
J
Judy Baker
10 years ago
We need someone who will tell the truth on the food policy panel, not a group of people who represent the food industry.
R
R Pienaar
10 years ago
Reinstate
B
Bob Johnston
10 years ago
Throwing Nina off the panel is affirmation that the others on the panle know she's right, they just don't want to be reminded of it by having to have discourse with her.
J
Jason Mehrvarz
10 years ago
Will the Food Policy Panel see this petition?
T
Tyler Easley
10 years ago
Now
J
Jason Mehrvarz
10 years ago
This goes against everything you learn as a civilized person. These petulant children (CSPI and USDA) would sooner take their ball and go home than participate in reasonable discourse. They are already exposed!
M
Michael Oliver
10 years ago
Nina Teicholz expertise and Common Sense approach can add valuable insight to the panel. What is the panel afraid of?
D
Deanna McLaughlin
10 years ago
We need this debate. Yes, food companies are complicit and portion sizes have skyrocketed. But LFHC recommendations were wrong. Let's have a dialogue.
J
Jenny Pearson
10 years ago
We are past the wake up call. We are now at the point of evacuating the building. This house is definitely on fire. And what happens, the curious, the onlookers, they gather. Now is when we strike. Loud and clear. Keep your voices strong, keep spreading the word. Nina, your book changed my life. Thank you.
N
Nick Papageorge
10 years ago
Excellent idea with protest
T
Terrence Levings
10 years ago
It is crucial to the health and wellbeing of our nation that food policy must include viewpoints that are independent of big business!
T
T McQuinn
10 years ago
Blatant cronyism is never an acceptable substitute for science.
M
Mike Broadley
10 years ago
Reinstate Nina for real debate
E
Eric sodicoff
10 years ago
Say no to mrs potatohead
O
Owen Ellis
10 years ago
To be so unsure of your position that you can't allow a different opinion.
M
Marika Sboros
10 years ago
Open debate the only way!
T
Theodore Naiman
10 years ago
Anyone with genuine motives would kill to add Nina Teicholz to their Food Policy Panel. Who exactly may we publically blame for the cowardly manipulation of removing her in the first place?
Follow the data, not the money.
Having nina teicholz&other truly independent experts is the only way to get good nutritional advice. This group has zero credibility without people like nina.
We need someone who will tell the truth on the food policy panel, not a group of people who represent the food industry.
Reinstate
Throwing Nina off the panel is affirmation that the others on the panle know she's right, they just don't want to be reminded of it by having to have discourse with her.
Will the Food Policy Panel see this petition?
Now
This goes against everything you learn as a civilized person. These petulant children (CSPI and USDA) would sooner take their ball and go home than participate in reasonable discourse. They are already exposed!
Nina Teicholz expertise and Common Sense approach can add valuable insight to the panel. What is the panel afraid of?
We need this debate. Yes, food companies are complicit and portion sizes have skyrocketed. But LFHC recommendations were wrong. Let's have a dialogue.
We are past the wake up call. We are now at the point of evacuating the building. This house is definitely on fire. And what happens, the curious, the onlookers, they gather. Now is when we strike. Loud and clear. Keep your voices strong, keep spreading the word. Nina, your book changed my life. Thank you.
Excellent idea with protest
It is crucial to the health and wellbeing of our nation that food policy must include viewpoints that are independent of big business!
Blatant cronyism is never an acceptable substitute for science.
Reinstate Nina for real debate
Say no to mrs potatohead
To be so unsure of your position that you can't allow a different opinion.
Open debate the only way!
Anyone with genuine motives would kill to add Nina Teicholz to their Food Policy Panel. Who exactly may we publically blame for the cowardly manipulation of removing her in the first place?
Who can't handle the truth?