Planning Application for Swan Wharf in Fish Island & White Post Lane Conservation Area (PA 14/00262/FUL)
681 Comments
R
Reginald Beer
10 years ago
There are too few 'complete' industrial heritage sites left to allow this site to be dismembered.
A
alison homewood
10 years ago
LONDON
J
Joanna Bowring
10 years ago
Once these buildings have been lost, the connection with its history is destroyed and another part of London will have lost its unique history for future generations.
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
If we don't value and maintain these wonderful buildings, which are the fabric of London's rich and multi-layered heritage, I fear our city is heading towards a faceless future. There is, and can be no case for not keeping them.
R
Richard Simpson
10 years ago
Essex road
P
Patricia Adams
10 years ago
A restored and well-maintained historic area will not only celebrate an important commercial past but will enhance and enrich new developments, providing character. Our rebuilt and new towns from the mid-20thC are still struggling to achieve this.
M
Molly Porter
10 years ago
Good wishes for the success of this important campaign.
N
nat ellis
10 years ago
Hackney
A
Andrew Whibley
10 years ago
Such buildings need to be preserved to record the areas history for future generations
L
Lisa Ugolini
10 years ago
Italy
A
Amanda
10 years ago
I am a local resident and very much value the fabric of these industrial buildings. The planned desctruction is philistine and greedy.
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
This is our national heritage, Don't let greedy people destroy it.
J
Jenny Linford
10 years ago
Hertfordshire
K
Keith Edwards
10 years ago
Let's preserve these unique buildings.
J
James khoury
10 years ago
Preservation over profit.
D
David Thompson
10 years ago
As part of the LLDC commitment to regeneration of the area this application should be refused as it is contrary to local plans and government guidance on support for small business. The area is home to many small businesses artisans and businesses whose livelihood would be threatened by substantial new housing development that would push up rents and force them away from the area. The multiple small businesses and enterprises helps to support the heritage assets. LLDC should pursue a more imaginative and thoughtful regeneration approach to this valuable area and retain its character.
M
Mary Davis
10 years ago
The Sprite of a building and history of any building can only be retained as a whole. To remove everything but external wall removes its sole. They have to be prsueved as a whole to retain there history. So much of London is just a fasard now. Learn by past mistakes.
I
ian stronge
10 years ago
we know this area from before the Olympics, it should be kept as a whole and adapted, nit treated as a mirage of facades. How often we demolish buildings we later learn to revere -- let's preserve and re-use in tribute to our pioneering forebears.
V
Vivienne Bellamy
· petition starter
10 years ago
Sarah, this development is offering 0% 'affordable' homes. The 'affordable' artist workspaces will have no natural light due to the insertion of the four-storey 'Jewel Building' in the yard, so they will be unfit for purpose.
S
sarah daniel
10 years ago
This block already houses thriving businesses, the employees of which live in the surrounding area. It's not 'falling into a state of disrepair' like the developer claims. Thy current small businesses wont be able to afford the new commercial rents, and no doubt the local people wont be able to afford the 'affordable homes'.
There are too few 'complete' industrial heritage sites left to allow this site to be dismembered.
LONDON
Once these buildings have been lost, the connection with its history is destroyed and another part of London will have lost its unique history for future generations.
If we don't value and maintain these wonderful buildings, which are the fabric of London's rich and multi-layered heritage, I fear our city is heading towards a faceless future. There is, and can be no case for not keeping them.
Essex road
A restored and well-maintained historic area will not only celebrate an important commercial past but will enhance and enrich new developments, providing character. Our rebuilt and new towns from the mid-20thC are still struggling to achieve this.
Good wishes for the success of this important campaign.
Hackney
Such buildings need to be preserved to record the areas history for future generations
Italy
I am a local resident and very much value the fabric of these industrial buildings. The planned desctruction is philistine and greedy.
This is our national heritage, Don't let greedy people destroy it.
Hertfordshire
Let's preserve these unique buildings.
Preservation over profit.
As part of the LLDC commitment to regeneration of the area this application should be refused as it is contrary to local plans and government guidance on support for small business. The area is home to many small businesses artisans and businesses whose livelihood would be threatened by substantial new housing development that would push up rents and force them away from the area. The multiple small businesses and enterprises helps to support the heritage assets. LLDC should pursue a more imaginative and thoughtful regeneration approach to this valuable area and retain its character.
The Sprite of a building and history of any building can only be retained as a whole. To remove everything but external wall removes its sole. They have to be prsueved as a whole to retain there history. So much of London is just a fasard now. Learn by past mistakes.
we know this area from before the Olympics, it should be kept as a whole and adapted, nit treated as a mirage of facades. How often we demolish buildings we later learn to revere -- let's preserve and re-use in tribute to our pioneering forebears.
Sarah, this development is offering 0% 'affordable' homes. The 'affordable' artist workspaces will have no natural light due to the insertion of the four-storey 'Jewel Building' in the yard, so they will be unfit for purpose.
This block already houses thriving businesses, the employees of which live in the surrounding area. It's not 'falling into a state of disrepair' like the developer claims. Thy current small businesses wont be able to afford the new commercial rents, and no doubt the local people wont be able to afford the 'affordable homes'.