Skip to main content

Radioactive Dumping in Our Ocean Must Be Better Publicized

52 Comments

J
JILL MURPHY LONG
6 years ago

Thanks!

P
Patricia Martz
6 years ago

I support that radioactive dumping in our ocean must be better publicized. It shouldn't happen at all.

A
Alice McNally
6 years ago Featured

Everyone notify the media and let them know that you would like the weather pages and reports to include a daily radiation level Water Safety item. ie: The daily water levels of discharges at SONGS of 2000-4000 gals and the larger Liquid batch releases 19,200 to 25,000 gals, as a water condition alert "Stay out of the Water " addition.

A
Anonymous
6 years ago

SCE should not be allowed to dump ANYTHING into the ocean. Enough is enough.

T
Terry Albrecht
6 years ago

Notification is a must!

O
Omid Kanani
6 years ago

Thank you San Clemente Green!!!

J
Joey Santley
6 years ago

C’mon! It’s ludicrous that we even have to do this. Give me 1 reason that it’s ok to not publicize these type of dangerous things

K
Karen Tanner
6 years ago Featured

I moved to northern California to get away from this disaster-waiting-to-happen. But for those who still live in the vicinity, SDGE owes them the courtesy of public and obvious notifications when they are preparing to poison the ocean.

D
Debbie Naude
6 years ago

Stop this toxic waste dumping!!!!!!

R
Reed Johnson
6 years ago Featured

We MUST be advised, with plenty of notice, when there will be radioactive releases (along with other toxic chemicals) into our ocean! I don’t appreciate learning of a release a couple days after I was in the ocean!

E
Elizabeth Kuhns
6 years ago

Safety First

C
Catherine Karas
6 years ago

PLEASE CONSIDER SAFETY FIRST Nuclear accidents CANNOT BE CLEANED UP.

M
marion simon
6 years ago

Thank you for all your work on this.

P
Peter Taft
6 years ago

Thank you to the organizations and activists looking after everyone’s interests and safety.

D
Dennis Trembly
6 years ago

If we can't control the events, at least we deserve to be notified effectively, for the opportunity to protect ourselves.

A
Art Hanson
6 years ago

I strongly OPPOSE nuclear energy because the short-run and the long-run dangers are far too great.

P
Patricia Gracian
6 years ago

The nuclear waste is being handled in a reckless way with no regard for the consequences. SCE must at least do a through monitoring and public reporting of radioactive waste allowed to escape from the defunct plant.

L
Leah
6 years ago

Outrageous-we must contain all radioactive waste; we must move fuel waste inland to higher ground undeveloped location, motor all casks, secure sights with military presence and oversight.

S
Samuel Lawrence Foiundation
6 years ago

a nuclear waste dump site in corroding/cracking thin cans, dangerous for the next 200,000 years, is unacceptable in our own backyard

S
Samuel Lawrence Foiundation
6 years ago

a nuclear waste dump site in corroding/cracking thin cans, dangerous for the next 200,000 years, is unacceptable in our own backyard