RA Should Reinstate Jess's Work and Issue a Public Apology
325 Comments
S
Susan King
5 years ago
When will you remove items associated with male abusers? Leave the cult and stop silencing and erasing women. Men cannot put on a frock and slap and magically turn into women.
R
Robert Eagle
5 years ago
It should be beyond belief that the RA would act in this manner. This attack on an artist is utterly depressing .
J
Joanna Young
5 years ago
Jess isn't transphobic, she's sticking up for women and girls, especially the most vulnerable, who have pushed aside in this virtual land grab. Humans are a diamorphic species, however we present.
P
Pete Vogel
5 years ago
Look at the facts
A
Alison McClean
5 years ago
Shameful behaviour by the RA - believing that sex matters and defending women's sex-based rights is not transphobic.
K
Kirsty Fleming
5 years ago
You have discriminated against a woman for her beliefs which are protected in law. Jess has never been hateful or transphobic.
A shocking decision which should be reversed immediately.
R
Richard Strang
5 years ago
RA is a disgrace. How to lose funding.
J
John Mark
5 years ago
It’s ridiculous that the Royal Academy have taken the decision to not stock Jess De Wahls work because of her expressed views, non of which are hateful. Just a daft decision.
S
Sheila Hannan
5 years ago
Jess de Wahls has not broken any UK law and has only expressed a viewpoint. I am horrified that this should lead to the RA banning the sale of her work. Is the RA now considering exploring the opinions of all the artists on display and removing works by those artists whose views they disagree with? I fear that the institution would lose most of its collection. This, however, would be the next logical step for the RA after this unacceptable and unreasonable censorship. This is the "thought police" at work.
S
Sarah Williams
5 years ago
The RA's cancellation of this artist is extraordinary. She hasn't demeaned or derided trans people she has just stated a biological fact. It's extraordinary that whomever at the RA took this decision is either too stupid to understand this or too craven to care. Shame on them.
S
Sian Evans
5 years ago
Please stop silencing women's voices!
A
Anita hitchcock
5 years ago
The RAA should reinstate Jess De Walls work in their gift shop. Art should transcend the stupid bigotry of identity and gender politics.
A
Anonymous
5 years ago
Shame on the R.A for its moral regression and cowardice with the activist metro-elite diktat. I shall not renew my membership neither shall I contribute until this “Commission” presents the artist its excuses.
A
Anonymous
5 years ago
RA, don’t just re-act to the Twitter trans trolls
P
Paulette Brough
5 years ago
RA needs to get real
J
Judi Bevan
5 years ago
Our gallery walks will be bare if this wokery takes over
M
Madeleine Morey
5 years ago
Please reverse this decision; don't let the bullies win.
E
EUPHEMIA ROMAIN
5 years ago
I am hoping to go to the RA this morning and have a ticket but I will avoid the shop . This action on the part of the RA is mis judged.
A
Anonymous
5 years ago
I strongly support this petition
A
Agnes Davey
5 years ago
A woman said or did or thought something that men didn't like!
When will you remove items associated with male abusers? Leave the cult and stop silencing and erasing women. Men cannot put on a frock and slap and magically turn into women.
It should be beyond belief that the RA would act in this manner. This attack on an artist is utterly depressing .
Jess isn't transphobic, she's sticking up for women and girls, especially the most vulnerable, who have pushed aside in this virtual land grab. Humans are a diamorphic species, however we present.
Look at the facts
Shameful behaviour by the RA - believing that sex matters and defending women's sex-based rights is not transphobic.
You have discriminated against a woman for her beliefs which are protected in law. Jess has never been hateful or transphobic. A shocking decision which should be reversed immediately.
RA is a disgrace. How to lose funding.
It’s ridiculous that the Royal Academy have taken the decision to not stock Jess De Wahls work because of her expressed views, non of which are hateful. Just a daft decision.
Jess de Wahls has not broken any UK law and has only expressed a viewpoint. I am horrified that this should lead to the RA banning the sale of her work. Is the RA now considering exploring the opinions of all the artists on display and removing works by those artists whose views they disagree with? I fear that the institution would lose most of its collection. This, however, would be the next logical step for the RA after this unacceptable and unreasonable censorship. This is the "thought police" at work.
The RA's cancellation of this artist is extraordinary. She hasn't demeaned or derided trans people she has just stated a biological fact. It's extraordinary that whomever at the RA took this decision is either too stupid to understand this or too craven to care. Shame on them.
Please stop silencing women's voices!
The RAA should reinstate Jess De Walls work in their gift shop. Art should transcend the stupid bigotry of identity and gender politics.
Shame on the R.A for its moral regression and cowardice with the activist metro-elite diktat. I shall not renew my membership neither shall I contribute until this “Commission” presents the artist its excuses.
RA, don’t just re-act to the Twitter trans trolls
RA needs to get real
Our gallery walks will be bare if this wokery takes over
Please reverse this decision; don't let the bullies win.
I am hoping to go to the RA this morning and have a ticket but I will avoid the shop . This action on the part of the RA is mis judged.
I strongly support this petition
A woman said or did or thought something that men didn't like!