We should be allowed the right to decide for our selves if we want to take our husbands name or not.
F
France Poirier
11 years ago
We should be allowed the right to decide for our selves if we want to take our husbands name or not.
D
Dan Bouchard
11 years ago
What is the difference between this shameful law and the law that bans women in some foreign countries from exercising their rights to education, marriage, and free speech? Just because you want to be different from other provinces doesn't take away people's right of choice.
D
Dan Bouchard
11 years ago
What is the difference between this shameful law and the law that bans women in some foreign countries from exercising their rights to education, marriage, and free speech? Just because you want to be different from other provinces doesn't take away people's right of choice.
C
Charlotte Thomas-Kluftinger
11 years ago
The thought behind this "progressive", "feminist" law was that taking your husband's surname insinuated that you are his property. Using that stream of thought, am I my father's property? As a feminist I loath this ludicrous law that encroaches on my right to choose my surname.
C
Charlotte Thomas-Kluftinger
11 years ago
Featured
The thought behind this "progressive", "feminist" law was that taking your husband's surname insinuated that you are his property. Using that stream of thought, am I my father's property? As a feminist I loath this ludicrous law that encroaches on my right to choose my surname.
M
Marlene Dunlop
11 years ago
I believe this law should be changed and that a woman has the right to take her husbands name. This law was changed based on feminists I am not a feminist and feel it is My civil right to decide if I wish to keep my maiden name, or join it with my husbands name.
M
Marlene Dunlop
11 years ago
I believe this law should be changed and that a woman has the right to take her husbands name. This law was changed based on feminists I am not a feminist and feel it is My civil right to decide if I wish to keep my maiden name, or join it with my husbands name.
S
Sylvie Dumas
11 years ago
I'm getting married in May 2015 and I would love to take my husbands name or at least hyphenate it so that when we have kids I don't have to hyphenate their last names with both of ours they can just take their fathers because mine would be hyphenated
S
Sylvie Dumas
11 years ago
I'm getting married in May 2015 and I would love to take my husbands name or at least hyphenate it so that when we have kids I don't have to hyphenate their last names with both of ours they can just take their fathers because mine would be hyphenated
S
Stacy Bornais
11 years ago
How is forcing women to keep their maiden name any more just then forcing them to take their spouses name? Both give the same lack of freedom to Quebec women. Pro Choice
S
Stacy Bornais
11 years ago
How is forcing women to keep their maiden name any more just then forcing them to take their spouses name? Both give the same lack of freedom to Quebec women. Pro Choice
M
Mr. Carol Choquette
11 years ago
The Quebec government feels that taking their spouses name belittles the women in the nature of living in their husbands shadow, But being forced to live with your parents last name is making women live in the shadow of their parents for the rest of their lives. I believe most woman want to start a new family with the man they love and be in uni sen with them then being lebelled as your parents child all your life. My fiance happens to be one of these ladies. I have lived in Quebec all my life but sadly because of our desire to share last names we are forced to move to another place that allows women to have this simply choice in their life.
M
Mr. Carol Choquette
11 years ago
The Quebec government feels that taking their spouses name belittles the women in the nature of living in their husbands shadow, But being forced to live with your parents last name is making women live in the shadow of their parents for the rest of their lives. I believe most woman want to start a new family with the man they love and be in uni sen with them then being lebelled as your parents child all your life. My fiance happens to be one of these ladies. I have lived in Quebec all my life but sadly because of our desire to share last names we are forced to move to another place that allows women to have this simply choice in their life.
H
Heather Boyer
11 years ago
I am a resident in Quebec and one of the main reasons I am seriously on the verge of moving back to Ontario is because of this unjust law. Not having the choice that so many other women have in other countries and provinces is unfair for Quebec woman residents. I love my fiance and I feel that taking his name gives you and your spouse a special closeness and the start as a new family. Its sad that you have to high-fen your childrens last names to make you and your spouce as an equal parent. There are substantially more women who wish they can take their husbands name then those who believe it is fair not having the choice to choose. I thought that the world was changing to give women more freedom, but our elders had the choice and now we dont.
H
Heather Boyer
11 years ago
I am a resident in Quebec and one of the main reasons I am seriously on the verge of moving back to Ontario is because of this unjust law. Not having the choice that so many other women have in other countries and provinces is unfair for Quebec woman residents. I love my fiance and I feel that taking his name gives you and your spouse a special closeness and the start as a new family. Its sad that you have to high-fen your childrens last names to make you and your spouce as an equal parent. There are substantially more women who wish they can take their husbands name then those who believe it is fair not having the choice to choose. I thought that the world was changing to give women more freedom, but our elders had the choice and now we dont.
E
Emmanuel Chayer
11 years ago
Pour ceux qui se le demande, voici ce que dis la chartes des droits et liberte article 7;
"On retrouve, en second lieu, le droit à la liberté, qui protège la liberté d'un individu d'agir sans contrainte physique (par exemple, l'emprisonnement serait une violation du droit à la liberté à moins d'être en conformité avec la justice fondamentale). Toutefois, ce droit a été élargi pour inclure le pouvoir de faire d'importants choix personnels. La Cour l'a décrit comme touchant à « l’essence même de ce que signifie le fait d’être une personne humaine autonome dotée de dignité et d’indépendance eu égard aux sujets qui peuvent à juste titre être qualifiés de fondamentalement ou d’essentiellement personnels. »9 En d'autres mots, le concept dépasse les simples contraintes imposées par le gouvernement et va au cœur même de l'existence humaine.."
For those wondering this is what the bill of rights says about the right of choice (which is part of the right of liberty
", there is the right to liberty, which protects an individual's freedom to act without physical restraint (i.e., imprisonment would be inconsistent with liberty unless it is consistent with fundamental justice). However, the right has been extended to include the power to make important personal choices. The court described it as "[touching] the core of what it means to be an autonomous human being blessed with dignity and independence in matters that can be characterized as fundamentally or inherently personal." (R. v. Clay, 2003) That is, the concept extends beyond physical restraint by the government as it goes to the core of the human experience."
E
Emmanuel Chayer
11 years ago
C'est une violation du droit de la femme a sa propres auto-détermination (le droit de choisir garanti par la charte des droits humain et canadien) que de forcer une loi qui lui interdit le choix de prendre le nom de son époux.
E
Emmanuel Chayer
11 years ago
C'est une violation du droit de la femme a sa propres auto-détermination (le droit de choisir garanti par la charte des droits humain et canadien) que de forcer une loi qui lui interdit le choix de prendre le nom de son époux.
S
Stéphanie Morneault
11 years ago
I want the right to choose! I want the right to take my fiancés name!
We should be allowed the right to decide for our selves if we want to take our husbands name or not.
We should be allowed the right to decide for our selves if we want to take our husbands name or not.
What is the difference between this shameful law and the law that bans women in some foreign countries from exercising their rights to education, marriage, and free speech? Just because you want to be different from other provinces doesn't take away people's right of choice.
What is the difference between this shameful law and the law that bans women in some foreign countries from exercising their rights to education, marriage, and free speech? Just because you want to be different from other provinces doesn't take away people's right of choice.
The thought behind this "progressive", "feminist" law was that taking your husband's surname insinuated that you are his property. Using that stream of thought, am I my father's property? As a feminist I loath this ludicrous law that encroaches on my right to choose my surname.
The thought behind this "progressive", "feminist" law was that taking your husband's surname insinuated that you are his property. Using that stream of thought, am I my father's property? As a feminist I loath this ludicrous law that encroaches on my right to choose my surname.
I believe this law should be changed and that a woman has the right to take her husbands name. This law was changed based on feminists I am not a feminist and feel it is My civil right to decide if I wish to keep my maiden name, or join it with my husbands name.
I believe this law should be changed and that a woman has the right to take her husbands name. This law was changed based on feminists I am not a feminist and feel it is My civil right to decide if I wish to keep my maiden name, or join it with my husbands name.
I'm getting married in May 2015 and I would love to take my husbands name or at least hyphenate it so that when we have kids I don't have to hyphenate their last names with both of ours they can just take their fathers because mine would be hyphenated
I'm getting married in May 2015 and I would love to take my husbands name or at least hyphenate it so that when we have kids I don't have to hyphenate their last names with both of ours they can just take their fathers because mine would be hyphenated
How is forcing women to keep their maiden name any more just then forcing them to take their spouses name? Both give the same lack of freedom to Quebec women. Pro Choice
How is forcing women to keep their maiden name any more just then forcing them to take their spouses name? Both give the same lack of freedom to Quebec women. Pro Choice
The Quebec government feels that taking their spouses name belittles the women in the nature of living in their husbands shadow, But being forced to live with your parents last name is making women live in the shadow of their parents for the rest of their lives. I believe most woman want to start a new family with the man they love and be in uni sen with them then being lebelled as your parents child all your life. My fiance happens to be one of these ladies. I have lived in Quebec all my life but sadly because of our desire to share last names we are forced to move to another place that allows women to have this simply choice in their life.
The Quebec government feels that taking their spouses name belittles the women in the nature of living in their husbands shadow, But being forced to live with your parents last name is making women live in the shadow of their parents for the rest of their lives. I believe most woman want to start a new family with the man they love and be in uni sen with them then being lebelled as your parents child all your life. My fiance happens to be one of these ladies. I have lived in Quebec all my life but sadly because of our desire to share last names we are forced to move to another place that allows women to have this simply choice in their life.
I am a resident in Quebec and one of the main reasons I am seriously on the verge of moving back to Ontario is because of this unjust law. Not having the choice that so many other women have in other countries and provinces is unfair for Quebec woman residents. I love my fiance and I feel that taking his name gives you and your spouse a special closeness and the start as a new family. Its sad that you have to high-fen your childrens last names to make you and your spouce as an equal parent. There are substantially more women who wish they can take their husbands name then those who believe it is fair not having the choice to choose. I thought that the world was changing to give women more freedom, but our elders had the choice and now we dont.
I am a resident in Quebec and one of the main reasons I am seriously on the verge of moving back to Ontario is because of this unjust law. Not having the choice that so many other women have in other countries and provinces is unfair for Quebec woman residents. I love my fiance and I feel that taking his name gives you and your spouse a special closeness and the start as a new family. Its sad that you have to high-fen your childrens last names to make you and your spouce as an equal parent. There are substantially more women who wish they can take their husbands name then those who believe it is fair not having the choice to choose. I thought that the world was changing to give women more freedom, but our elders had the choice and now we dont.
Pour ceux qui se le demande, voici ce que dis la chartes des droits et liberte article 7; "On retrouve, en second lieu, le droit à la liberté, qui protège la liberté d'un individu d'agir sans contrainte physique (par exemple, l'emprisonnement serait une violation du droit à la liberté à moins d'être en conformité avec la justice fondamentale). Toutefois, ce droit a été élargi pour inclure le pouvoir de faire d'importants choix personnels. La Cour l'a décrit comme touchant à « l’essence même de ce que signifie le fait d’être une personne humaine autonome dotée de dignité et d’indépendance eu égard aux sujets qui peuvent à juste titre être qualifiés de fondamentalement ou d’essentiellement personnels. »9 En d'autres mots, le concept dépasse les simples contraintes imposées par le gouvernement et va au cœur même de l'existence humaine.." For those wondering this is what the bill of rights says about the right of choice (which is part of the right of liberty ", there is the right to liberty, which protects an individual's freedom to act without physical restraint (i.e., imprisonment would be inconsistent with liberty unless it is consistent with fundamental justice). However, the right has been extended to include the power to make important personal choices. The court described it as "[touching] the core of what it means to be an autonomous human being blessed with dignity and independence in matters that can be characterized as fundamentally or inherently personal." (R. v. Clay, 2003) That is, the concept extends beyond physical restraint by the government as it goes to the core of the human experience."
C'est une violation du droit de la femme a sa propres auto-détermination (le droit de choisir garanti par la charte des droits humain et canadien) que de forcer une loi qui lui interdit le choix de prendre le nom de son époux.
C'est une violation du droit de la femme a sa propres auto-détermination (le droit de choisir garanti par la charte des droits humain et canadien) que de forcer une loi qui lui interdit le choix de prendre le nom de son époux.
I want the right to choose! I want the right to take my fiancés name!