I oppose this redone as it will cause more traffic jams in the school area.
L
Lynn Hinson
8 years ago
As a former employee of Charlotte Latin School, I know that Charlotte Latin has enough privately owned land to build on and use as they see fit.
X
Xi Wu
8 years ago
No to the rezoning!
R
Robert Edwards
8 years ago
Don’t change the density
A
Anonymous
8 years ago
This is directly in front of the elementary school. Please don’t add more traffic and safety risks for the sake of a few dollars.
C
Chris Holden
8 years ago
This would add to an already overcrowded area!
A
Ann Beller
8 years ago
no to re-zone!
L
Larry Hendrix
8 years ago
Opposed. Too much of a trend already.
L
Lewis Fried
8 years ago
This will increase density, traffic, et al. And violates existing regulations.
C
Christy Holden
8 years ago
This development is too dense in an already overcrowded corridor.
K
Karen Salter
8 years ago
Against rezoning
K
Kim Salter
8 years ago
Traffic is congested enough already!!
D
Debby Weiss
8 years ago
Pls do not allow this to happen. How many more homes can we try and put onto one small piece of land.
C
Carolyn Humphrey
8 years ago
I am opposed to Petition 2017-202 and believe that the property in question should remain an R3 zone.
N
Nellie S Kilpatrick
8 years ago
I strongly request that the Charlotte City Council NOT approve Rezoning Petition 2017-202 , which does NOT comply with requirements set forth in the city's own Zoning Ordinance Section 6.111 2(a): that area should be "compatible with existing neighborhoods," "specific density guidance is provided and should supersede the General Development Policies." It further states that design should "promote development which reflects the unique history and character of the area." The proposed rezoning petition exceeds the Area Plan residential density. The UR-2 zoning classification is therefore not consistent with the Area Plan.
E
Elizabeth Poplin
8 years ago
With so many children moving about, our elementary school cannot handle additional traffic here. Housing units built so close to a large elementary school would jeopardize the safety of our children. Please consider this reality...the safety of our children is so much more important than the potential profit for this builder.
A
Anonymous
8 years ago
traffic flow is already at maximum limit
M
Meghan Swedberg
8 years ago
No to rezoning
M
Marla Mahon
8 years ago
I am opposed to Petition 2017-202 and believe that the property in question should remain an R3 zone.
K
Kristi Moore
8 years ago
I am opposed to this area becoming a multi unit development. It will negatively affect the church and risk the safety of the children at the elementary school due to worsening traffic and congestion.
I oppose this redone as it will cause more traffic jams in the school area.
As a former employee of Charlotte Latin School, I know that Charlotte Latin has enough privately owned land to build on and use as they see fit.
No to the rezoning!
Don’t change the density
This is directly in front of the elementary school. Please don’t add more traffic and safety risks for the sake of a few dollars.
This would add to an already overcrowded area!
no to re-zone!
Opposed. Too much of a trend already.
This will increase density, traffic, et al. And violates existing regulations.
This development is too dense in an already overcrowded corridor.
Against rezoning
Traffic is congested enough already!!
Pls do not allow this to happen. How many more homes can we try and put onto one small piece of land.
I am opposed to Petition 2017-202 and believe that the property in question should remain an R3 zone.
I strongly request that the Charlotte City Council NOT approve Rezoning Petition 2017-202 , which does NOT comply with requirements set forth in the city's own Zoning Ordinance Section 6.111 2(a): that area should be "compatible with existing neighborhoods," "specific density guidance is provided and should supersede the General Development Policies." It further states that design should "promote development which reflects the unique history and character of the area." The proposed rezoning petition exceeds the Area Plan residential density. The UR-2 zoning classification is therefore not consistent with the Area Plan.
With so many children moving about, our elementary school cannot handle additional traffic here. Housing units built so close to a large elementary school would jeopardize the safety of our children. Please consider this reality...the safety of our children is so much more important than the potential profit for this builder.
traffic flow is already at maximum limit
No to rezoning
I am opposed to Petition 2017-202 and believe that the property in question should remain an R3 zone.
I am opposed to this area becoming a multi unit development. It will negatively affect the church and risk the safety of the children at the elementary school due to worsening traffic and congestion.