why use the greenfields when they could use the brownfield?
M
mrs helen gunn
11 years ago
overdevelopment of greenfield sites where there is no infastructure in the village
L
Lesley Raymond
11 years ago
Please keep Hassocks as a treasured village for.our children and future generations. It is too special tol lose!
S
Sarra Nielsen
11 years ago
Please dont turn our village into a town. Pollution here is already a problem.
R
Ruth Ticehurst
11 years ago
Preserve the local gap
J
julia brown
11 years ago
I have currently three seperate large developments on three sides of my home, all within 100metres of stonepound junction which when completed ,will add to the congestion,noise and air pollution I already have to suffer outside my home .It is incredible and quite inconceivable that any official person, with the power to influence or decide the outcome of this application ,even considering this proposal acceptable ,with it's ridiculous projection or more realistically PREDICTION of the traffic situation not significantly adding more harm to the local population needs to come and spend a few days and nights as my guest and then common sense alone, without reams of made up reports and assesments will bring them to their senses.The Government talks a lot about giving choice and decision making to us, at local level, regarding the issues that affect and matter us WELL THIS MATTERS SO DON'T OVERIDE US we are silent majority that have found our voice!
S
Sonia Kalisky
11 years ago
There is already dreadful traffic and deadly traffic pollution in the South East. Please keep this peaceful field free of 'horrid new build' between Hassocks and Hurstpierpoint
R
Roy Ticehurst
11 years ago
If this development goes ahead then it is the green light for other developers to close the strategic gap between Hassocks and neighbouring villages and towns.
W
will attfield
11 years ago
agree that this should not preempt the Neighbourhood Plan
A
andrew satchwell
11 years ago
no more developments, we hav taken our fair share in the last few yesrs.
M
Matt Tovey
11 years ago
protect the environment from additional traffic and pollution. Hassocks and Hurstpierpoint are beautiful makages and shouldn't pay the price to overzealous developers wanting to make money
M
Matt Tovey
11 years ago
protect the environment from additional traffic and pollution. Hassocks and Hurstpierpoint are beautiful villages and shouldn't pay the price to overzealous developers wa
M
Matt Tovey
11 years ago
protect the environment from additional traffic and pollution. Hadd
C
Christine Q
11 years ago
There are much better sites if we really need more housing but not this one. Pollution is awful and the traffic unbearable as it is. NO, NO, NO
L
Lisa
11 years ago
traffic, pollution, gap between Hassocks and Hurst, flooding, need we go on.
J
J Melhuish
11 years ago
More pollution, more noise, more traffic, less local facilities & school places. NO THANK YOU.
P
peter bennett
11 years ago
no to development
S
Sally Owens
11 years ago
Hassocks should stay a village with a clear boundary and not become part of an urban sprawl.
C
CAROL BULLIMORE
11 years ago
pollution beyond acceptable levels, traffic
I
Ian Buxton
11 years ago
The petition and comments adequately summarize the issues involved. So often avaricious developers put their own self interests in front of the those of the local community.
why use the greenfields when they could use the brownfield?
overdevelopment of greenfield sites where there is no infastructure in the village
Please keep Hassocks as a treasured village for.our children and future generations. It is too special tol lose!
Please dont turn our village into a town. Pollution here is already a problem.
Preserve the local gap
I have currently three seperate large developments on three sides of my home, all within 100metres of stonepound junction which when completed ,will add to the congestion,noise and air pollution I already have to suffer outside my home .It is incredible and quite inconceivable that any official person, with the power to influence or decide the outcome of this application ,even considering this proposal acceptable ,with it's ridiculous projection or more realistically PREDICTION of the traffic situation not significantly adding more harm to the local population needs to come and spend a few days and nights as my guest and then common sense alone, without reams of made up reports and assesments will bring them to their senses.The Government talks a lot about giving choice and decision making to us, at local level, regarding the issues that affect and matter us WELL THIS MATTERS SO DON'T OVERIDE US we are silent majority that have found our voice!
There is already dreadful traffic and deadly traffic pollution in the South East. Please keep this peaceful field free of 'horrid new build' between Hassocks and Hurstpierpoint
If this development goes ahead then it is the green light for other developers to close the strategic gap between Hassocks and neighbouring villages and towns.
agree that this should not preempt the Neighbourhood Plan
no more developments, we hav taken our fair share in the last few yesrs.
protect the environment from additional traffic and pollution. Hassocks and Hurstpierpoint are beautiful makages and shouldn't pay the price to overzealous developers wanting to make money
protect the environment from additional traffic and pollution. Hassocks and Hurstpierpoint are beautiful villages and shouldn't pay the price to overzealous developers wa
protect the environment from additional traffic and pollution. Hadd
There are much better sites if we really need more housing but not this one. Pollution is awful and the traffic unbearable as it is. NO, NO, NO
traffic, pollution, gap between Hassocks and Hurst, flooding, need we go on.
More pollution, more noise, more traffic, less local facilities & school places. NO THANK YOU.
no to development
Hassocks should stay a village with a clear boundary and not become part of an urban sprawl.
pollution beyond acceptable levels, traffic
The petition and comments adequately summarize the issues involved. So often avaricious developers put their own self interests in front of the those of the local community.