Protect Prospect Ridge Rd Woods & Wetlands as Open Space
81 Comments
L
Linda Lavelle
4 years ago
Until ALL multi-family units are counted as viable in the State's arbitrary decision as to what Ridgefield should build, I won't support this project or ANY further development of multiple units in our already over-developed historic town!
S
Suzanne Conlin
4 years ago
It will cause so many problems of increased traffic, and most importantly, destroy the beautiful
environment of the town.
beautiful,
Suzanne Conlin
G
Gerald Koren
4 years ago
Why not rebuild housing in cities that have the space?
L
Linda Koren
4 years ago
What's next? A 684 running through. Ridgefield is a beautiful & unique town, rich with history. Let's keep it that way.
L
Lorraine Duffy
4 years ago
Further development would be to the detriment of present residents and taxpayers who cherish the beauty of the town. We value our open spaces and we value our environment
A
Anonymous
4 years ago
Thanks to everyone who is trying to preserve the beauty of Ridgefield for our children and grandchildren.
A
Anthony Perrelli
4 years ago
Ridgefield is reaching a point of over development and overpopulation. Infrastructure cannot handle multiple unit buildings. Stop this unnecessary project.
M
M Panzer
4 years ago
We must protect our open spaces and preserve the beauty of our town's landscape. Don't an extra burden onto our residents!
W
William Jaeger
4 years ago
What the State had mandated, and what the committee has done, is outrageous!
L
Linda Tilton
4 years ago
Enough with the social engineering. Mr. Goldenberg does not speak for me.
D
David Tullis
4 years ago
We need to protect our open spaces and manage development responsibly.
W
Williammcnamara
4 years ago
How the heck does an unelected, appointed committee member capture such disproportionate power to impose his wishes on an entire town? Speak up or suffer the permanent damage!
J
Jerry Gatto
4 years ago
Ridgefield is congested enough. We can barely drive through main st
T
Thomas R Jones
4 years ago
It is outrageous that the government of Ridgefield would even consider development on this parcel.
B
Bobby Mathoda
4 years ago
I think that open space is more important to the well being of its residents than some 'development' no matter how well intentioned.
J
Joe Trench
4 years ago
I support open space over some individuals political agenda
B
Bob kralik
4 years ago
Vote no
S
Samuel Schnapp
4 years ago
“We do not inherit the land from our ancestors. We borrow it from our children.”
Chief Seattle.
Until ALL multi-family units are counted as viable in the State's arbitrary decision as to what Ridgefield should build, I won't support this project or ANY further development of multiple units in our already over-developed historic town!
It will cause so many problems of increased traffic, and most importantly, destroy the beautiful environment of the town. beautiful, Suzanne Conlin
Why not rebuild housing in cities that have the space?
What's next? A 684 running through. Ridgefield is a beautiful & unique town, rich with history. Let's keep it that way.
Further development would be to the detriment of present residents and taxpayers who cherish the beauty of the town. We value our open spaces and we value our environment
Thanks to everyone who is trying to preserve the beauty of Ridgefield for our children and grandchildren.
Ridgefield is reaching a point of over development and overpopulation. Infrastructure cannot handle multiple unit buildings. Stop this unnecessary project.
We must protect our open spaces and preserve the beauty of our town's landscape. Don't an extra burden onto our residents!
What the State had mandated, and what the committee has done, is outrageous!
Enough with the social engineering. Mr. Goldenberg does not speak for me.
We need to protect our open spaces and manage development responsibly.
How the heck does an unelected, appointed committee member capture such disproportionate power to impose his wishes on an entire town? Speak up or suffer the permanent damage!
Ridgefield is congested enough. We can barely drive through main st
It is outrageous that the government of Ridgefield would even consider development on this parcel.
I think that open space is more important to the well being of its residents than some 'development' no matter how well intentioned.
I support open space over some individuals political agenda
Vote no
“We do not inherit the land from our ancestors. We borrow it from our children.” Chief Seattle.
No more development. No matter what.
No more buildings!