Skip to main content

Proposed Consumption site at 366 Henry Ave

158 Comments

R
Rowena Panganiban
7 months ago

No drug consumption building

D
Derek Escudero-Whu
7 months ago

I was told to do this, but this is some Winnipeg level nonsense .

T
tyron Sriakkhachan
7 months ago

you know dat 1 baybece, ashalla oshalla

R
Rich Duclos
7 months ago

Not wanted!!

A
Anonymous
7 months ago

we don't need more druggies

W
WILKIN LUI
7 months ago

Don't want the injection site in this area, it will destroy our retail business.

B
Boris P
7 months ago

I support this petition

T
Terry Wong
7 months ago

Horrible

A
Anonymous
7 months ago Featured

I am a nurse at HSC and the area is already disproportionately affected by crime, addiction, and homelessness. This consumption site creates even more of a danger for the area.

J
Jeff D
7 months ago

This can NOT happen. Think of the kids. Think of the future.

V
Varina
7 months ago

For the safety and growth of the local businesses, I do not support having drug users facilitated! We are hard working tax payers, and should be able to continue to work in and around a safe and healthy environment!

G
Giuseppe Lingal
7 months ago

Cmon man

M
Marc Lachance
7 months ago

Relocate!

J
Jomell Salvador
7 months ago

Should have given the area enough notice

A
Anonymous
7 months ago

This poses a real safety issue for the residents nearby. Those who live there especially kids and the elderly will put their safety at risk.

J
Jonathan Guerrero
7 months ago Featured

Location not ideal due to residents living nearby (the elderly, young families, children) will put their safety at high risk and exposures to transmission of infectious diseases, needle stick injuries, overdose incidents and violent encounters. These situations will lead to serious injuries and deaths.

L
Lisa C
7 months ago

These are issues I want assessed in our area. As per Canadian Journal of Public Health April 29, 2024 article on public health research should focus on: * 
The effects of SIS implementation on neighbourhood crime and crime-related stressors using observational (e.g., physical and social disorder) and survey data (e.g., victimization experiences, fear); * 
The impact of SIS proximity on residents’ health and well-being, and in particular on the use of active transportation and psychological distress; * 
The impacts of SIS on neighbourhood-level processes related to community well-being, including socioeconomic composition, residential instability, use of public spaces, trust in neighbours, and perceived social cohesion; * 
The differential impacts for vulnerable local populations, such as children, single mothers, people facing mental and physical health issues, and immigrants; * 
The impacts of SIS on different spatial scales (immediate surrounding environment, neighbouring environments); * 
The long-term impacts of SIS (more than two years).

I
Isidro Zapata
7 months ago

Yes we need a open and fair assessment of pros and cons to residents and bussines alike