Maryland Ave NE: YES for Safety, NO for Road Diet.
36 Comments
M
Maileen Villamor
9 years ago
Where is the volume of cars that use Maryland Ave during peak rush hour times supposed to go? H St and C St are already also congested.
J
Joe Gunderson
9 years ago
its instructive and enlightening that the opponents of the road diet project on this site have to rely on lies, fear, hatred of bicyclists, and largely don't even live in the community. The fear of some their multi-million dollar homes will go down in value and the worth of their home is more important than peoples lives is even more amazing! LOL - good luck! You have convinced me this project is a great idea.
Faster roads, more double parking, and selfishness for all!! Sounds like a winner to me!
T
Travis Thorn
9 years ago
Very Bad Idea
J
Juanita Lancaster
9 years ago
We have Churches on Maryland Avenue
NE, You know Funeral will take place on Maryland Avenue .
W
Warren Strother
9 years ago
I oppose the Maryland Ave. NE Road Diet.
R
Rakeisha Strother
9 years ago
This is a horrible plan. I oppose the Maryland Ave NE Road "Diet"!
V
Vicente Tur-Rojas
9 years ago
This is an ill-conceived concept.
(1) it will cause the roadway Level of Service (HCM/AASHTO) to go to F, which will make it MORE dangerous for everyone, motorists and pedestrians/cyclists
(2) the reduced level of service will in turn cause more pollution since there will be a constant slow flow of cars throughout the day.
(3) the layout design proposed is dangerous to cyclists, they are now squeezed in between a single lane of frustrated motorists and people either double-parking, trying to swerve around other vehicles, or parking.
(4) the middle turn-both way lane is a waste of a usable traffic lane since it's only necessary close to intersections and would be a potential constant cause of collisions
(5) while not technically an arterial lane, commuters use it as such
(6) during snow emergencies, this new design is a recipe for disaster since Maryland Avenue is a designated evacuation route
(7) I am an avid competitive cyclist, and think there are plenty of options for safe bike lanes in this area...most notably East Capitol Street.
(8) the original approval of this concept was predicated on a pilot study. DDOT stated that it's not feasible, and is now bulldozing ahead as if they have carte blanche. A lawsuit to stop this project would be pretty rock solid.
L
Larry Butler
9 years ago
No for this proposal. No notice and our concerns are being ignored.
W
Wanda Butler
9 years ago
Featured
No road diet! Taxpayers are entitled to notice of proposed road changes which such severe impact and an entitled to an opportunity to express their concerns and opinions. Neither happened here.
E
Ellen Ambrose
9 years ago
Featured
As someone who lives on Elliott Street, I'm concerned that the traffic at the east end of Maryland Avenue will be so congested that we won't be able to get on our own street without waiting in that traffic. Worse yet, people will, no doubt, use our street to bypass the this congestion.
A
Anonymous
9 years ago
It's Naïve to think traffic will not reroute down narrower side streets that have more pedestrians and fewer traffic lights. This plan may make MD Ave safer, but will make side streets more dangerous.
B
Beverly Hull-Carter
9 years ago
Road Diet on Maryland Avenue makes no sense whatsoever. There is already congestion there with the four lanes , the traffic from H St because of the detours people take to avoid the Streetcars , the restaurants adding more traffic. Also the new condos ,residents and extra cars in the area. That will make the surrounding neighborhoods worse than they are now.with people detouring trying to beat the traffic jams. Makes no sense at all .
A
Anonymous
9 years ago
The traffic and congestion that already exists on Maryland Avenue is significant. These proposed changes are completely illogical when considered with the actual use of the road, and the limited and out dated data these recommendations are being based on is clearly deliberately misleading. Maryland Avenue not only accommodates traffic from those who live on the Hill, but it is a major commuter road for those that travel distances that require cars/are not able to bike. The realistic count of people that already use bikes on this road or that could potentially does not warrant these specific suggested changes.
B
Beverly Hull-Carter
9 years ago
Road Diet on Maryland Avenue makes no sense whatsoever. There is already congestion there with the four lanes , the traffic from H St because of the detours people take to avoid the Streetcars , the restaurants adding more traffic. Also the new condos ,residents and extra cars in the area. That will make the surrounding neighborhoods worse than they are now.with people detouring trying to beat the traffic jams. Makes no sense at all .
A
Anonymous
9 years ago
Featured
I think there should be a clear cost-benefit comparison between implementing a "road diet" option vs implementing traditional safety measures. The "road diet" option sounds like it'll be less efficient from a budget and impact standpoint.
C
Carl williams
9 years ago
Against project, to much inconvenience.
R
Rogene Waite
9 years ago
The "Road Diet" for Maryland Avenue is completely absurd and not supported by long time residents such as me. Congestion would be increased on nearby roads which are already over used because of changes to H, C, D and E Streets NE. There are a sufficient number of bike lanes. What we need is to retain and support sufficient lanes for vehicles in our neighborhood. Rush hours are already a nightmare and should not be made worse. Also, please focus on the fact that the number of residents who are aging, handicapped, etc. and need to drive, not bike, is growing. I do not have a problem with change but change should be smart and take the total population into account, not just some millennials biking about.
C
Carol Hilliard
9 years ago
This will no doubt result in more cars diverting onto G St and 13th. This corner of 13th and G is already too busy with cars cutting through - we had to get a speed bump on G; plus many cars already blow through the stop sign coming down from Maryland Ave to H St. I fear it will get much worse.
M
Michelle L Butler
9 years ago
Maryland Avenue does not need a road diet at all. It should be left just like it is now!
A
Adele Ruppe
9 years ago
This project was moved forward without the DDOT mandated community engagement and support. They are holding pedestrian safety hostage to a road diet. I am against a road diet because it will increase congestion and divert aggressive drivers onto side streets unequipped to handle them. I support more traffic lights and pedestrian crossing lights at dangerous intersections. Also, trim trees to increase visibility, and don't allow the bike share van to park where the vehicle reduces line of sight. Eliminate parking spaces around 7th street to increase visibility of pedestrians. Hold bicyclists accountable for obeying traffic laws. They are endangering pedestrians by biking aggressively on streets and side walks, and refusing to obey traffic signals and crossings. Look at other alternatives for adding a bike lane, like putting it in the middle like Pennsylvania Avenue or using part of the sidewalk.
Where is the volume of cars that use Maryland Ave during peak rush hour times supposed to go? H St and C St are already also congested.
its instructive and enlightening that the opponents of the road diet project on this site have to rely on lies, fear, hatred of bicyclists, and largely don't even live in the community. The fear of some their multi-million dollar homes will go down in value and the worth of their home is more important than peoples lives is even more amazing! LOL - good luck! You have convinced me this project is a great idea. Faster roads, more double parking, and selfishness for all!! Sounds like a winner to me!
Very Bad Idea
We have Churches on Maryland Avenue NE, You know Funeral will take place on Maryland Avenue .
I oppose the Maryland Ave. NE Road Diet.
This is a horrible plan. I oppose the Maryland Ave NE Road "Diet"!
This is an ill-conceived concept. (1) it will cause the roadway Level of Service (HCM/AASHTO) to go to F, which will make it MORE dangerous for everyone, motorists and pedestrians/cyclists (2) the reduced level of service will in turn cause more pollution since there will be a constant slow flow of cars throughout the day. (3) the layout design proposed is dangerous to cyclists, they are now squeezed in between a single lane of frustrated motorists and people either double-parking, trying to swerve around other vehicles, or parking. (4) the middle turn-both way lane is a waste of a usable traffic lane since it's only necessary close to intersections and would be a potential constant cause of collisions (5) while not technically an arterial lane, commuters use it as such (6) during snow emergencies, this new design is a recipe for disaster since Maryland Avenue is a designated evacuation route (7) I am an avid competitive cyclist, and think there are plenty of options for safe bike lanes in this area...most notably East Capitol Street. (8) the original approval of this concept was predicated on a pilot study. DDOT stated that it's not feasible, and is now bulldozing ahead as if they have carte blanche. A lawsuit to stop this project would be pretty rock solid.
No for this proposal. No notice and our concerns are being ignored.
No road diet! Taxpayers are entitled to notice of proposed road changes which such severe impact and an entitled to an opportunity to express their concerns and opinions. Neither happened here.
As someone who lives on Elliott Street, I'm concerned that the traffic at the east end of Maryland Avenue will be so congested that we won't be able to get on our own street without waiting in that traffic. Worse yet, people will, no doubt, use our street to bypass the this congestion.
It's Naïve to think traffic will not reroute down narrower side streets that have more pedestrians and fewer traffic lights. This plan may make MD Ave safer, but will make side streets more dangerous.
Road Diet on Maryland Avenue makes no sense whatsoever. There is already congestion there with the four lanes , the traffic from H St because of the detours people take to avoid the Streetcars , the restaurants adding more traffic. Also the new condos ,residents and extra cars in the area. That will make the surrounding neighborhoods worse than they are now.with people detouring trying to beat the traffic jams. Makes no sense at all .
The traffic and congestion that already exists on Maryland Avenue is significant. These proposed changes are completely illogical when considered with the actual use of the road, and the limited and out dated data these recommendations are being based on is clearly deliberately misleading. Maryland Avenue not only accommodates traffic from those who live on the Hill, but it is a major commuter road for those that travel distances that require cars/are not able to bike. The realistic count of people that already use bikes on this road or that could potentially does not warrant these specific suggested changes.
Road Diet on Maryland Avenue makes no sense whatsoever. There is already congestion there with the four lanes , the traffic from H St because of the detours people take to avoid the Streetcars , the restaurants adding more traffic. Also the new condos ,residents and extra cars in the area. That will make the surrounding neighborhoods worse than they are now.with people detouring trying to beat the traffic jams. Makes no sense at all .
I think there should be a clear cost-benefit comparison between implementing a "road diet" option vs implementing traditional safety measures. The "road diet" option sounds like it'll be less efficient from a budget and impact standpoint.
Against project, to much inconvenience.
The "Road Diet" for Maryland Avenue is completely absurd and not supported by long time residents such as me. Congestion would be increased on nearby roads which are already over used because of changes to H, C, D and E Streets NE. There are a sufficient number of bike lanes. What we need is to retain and support sufficient lanes for vehicles in our neighborhood. Rush hours are already a nightmare and should not be made worse. Also, please focus on the fact that the number of residents who are aging, handicapped, etc. and need to drive, not bike, is growing. I do not have a problem with change but change should be smart and take the total population into account, not just some millennials biking about.
This will no doubt result in more cars diverting onto G St and 13th. This corner of 13th and G is already too busy with cars cutting through - we had to get a speed bump on G; plus many cars already blow through the stop sign coming down from Maryland Ave to H St. I fear it will get much worse.
Maryland Avenue does not need a road diet at all. It should be left just like it is now!
This project was moved forward without the DDOT mandated community engagement and support. They are holding pedestrian safety hostage to a road diet. I am against a road diet because it will increase congestion and divert aggressive drivers onto side streets unequipped to handle them. I support more traffic lights and pedestrian crossing lights at dangerous intersections. Also, trim trees to increase visibility, and don't allow the bike share van to park where the vehicle reduces line of sight. Eliminate parking spaces around 7th street to increase visibility of pedestrians. Hold bicyclists accountable for obeying traffic laws. They are endangering pedestrians by biking aggressively on streets and side walks, and refusing to obey traffic signals and crossings. Look at other alternatives for adding a bike lane, like putting it in the middle like Pennsylvania Avenue or using part of the sidewalk.