Petition to Address Year Back 2022 & 2023 batch (2025-2026 Academic year)
2,518 Comments
S
Shreya
1 year ago
Plss remove the credit system
D
Devananda Manoj
1 year ago
Please consider promoting the 22–23 batch without a year back. Many students have faced challenges beyond their control during that academic period.It would be more fair to assess the 22–23 batch with leniency due to academic disruptions and mental health challenges many faced during that time.
A year back could severely affect students' careers and morale. Alternative academic solutions should be explored for the 22–23 batch.
A
Ayush N
1 year ago
This is to inform about the year back system for S4 and S6 students of ktu
Please do favour for these students it will lead to moral and ethical issues and will probably affect their carrier...
B
Ben Xavier
1 year ago
Please remove year back system
A
AKASH Thomas
1 year ago
Pls remove year back
B
Brino vincent
1 year ago
Please consider promoting the 22–23 batch without a year back. Many students have faced challenges beyond their control during that academic period.It would be more fair to assess the 22–23 batch with leniency due to academic disruptions and mental health challenges many faced during that time.
A year back could severely affect students' careers and morale. Alternative academic solutions should be explored for the 22–23 batch.
M
mohammad nafih
1 year ago
To
The Honorable Vice-Chancellor,
APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University (KTU),
Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala.
Subject: Request for reconsideration and exemption from the yearback system for affected students due to academic and administrative challenges.
Respected Sir/Madam,
We, the undersigned students of KTU, respectfully submit this petition to request a reconsideration of the yearback policy being enforced on certain batches. The implementation of this policy, under the current academic and practical circumstances, is unjust and harmful to the affected students’ academic careers and mental well-being. We wish to bring the following critical concerns to your kind attention:
1. COVID-19 Impact on Learning:
The current S6 students belong to the batch that faced two consecutive academic years of online learning due to the COVID-19 pandemic. These students were deprived of proper in-person classes during their foundational semesters (S1–S4), leading to severe gaps in understanding key subjects. This has had a lasting impact on their academic performance.
2. Yearback Implementation Confusion for S4 Students:
In the case of S4 students, if the yearback rule is strictly implemented, they will face a situation where they may be shifted to a new academic scheme (possibly the 2024 scheme). This shift is highly disruptive, as it will force students to adapt to an entirely different curriculum midway through their education, which is neither practical nor fair.
3. Unfair Discrepancy with the 2019 Batch:
The 2019 admission batch, despite facing similar or lesser academic difficulties, was not subjected to the yearback policy. Applying it now to current students, who dealt with more intense disruptions due to the pandemic, shows inconsistency in the university’s decisions and creates a sense of injustice.
4. Lack of Clear Official Circular on Yearback:
The university has not issued a comprehensive and transparent circular regarding the implementation
A
Anuparnika p k
1 year ago
Please consider promoting the 22–23 batch without a year back. Many students have faced challenges beyond their control during that academic period.It would be more fair to assess the 22–23 batch with leniency due to academic disruptions and mental health challenges many faced during that time.
A year back could severely affect students' careers and morale. Alternative academic solutions should be explored for the 22–23 batch.
A
Anonymous
1 year ago
I'm against the year-back system
A
Anirudh
1 year ago
Maatanam
A
Anonymous
1 year ago
Please consider
H
Harikrishna
1 year ago
Pls stop year back or i will sucide I can’t family my society and family we don’t get much in +2 and in last year back didn,t hence this his fair
K
Krishnananda
1 year ago
This yearback system will ruin many students and their families future. Please remove this..
A
Adithyan r
1 year ago
Please ktu
M
Meenakshi
1 year ago
Against year back system in 2022 &2023 batch
D
Deepak Dileesh
1 year ago
I kindly requested to remove the year back on s4 2019 scheme
A
Anonymous
1 year ago
No year back for 2022 & 2023 batch
A
Adhil
1 year ago
Please consider promoting the 22–23 batch without a year back. Many students have faced challenges beyond their control during that academic period.It would be more fair to assess the 22–23 batch with leniency due to academic disruptions and mental health challenges many faced during that time.
A year back could severely affect students' careers and morale. Alternative academic solutions should be explored for the 22–23 batch.
N
Niranjana U Nair
1 year ago
Year back
R
Rithuvarna
1 year ago
Please consider promoting the 22–23 batch without a year back. Many students have faced challenges beyond their control during that academic period.It would be more fair to assess the 22–23 batch with leniency due to academic disruptions and mental health challenges many faced during that time.
A year back could severely affect students' careers and morale. Alternative academic solutions should be explored for the 22–23 batch.
Plss remove the credit system
Please consider promoting the 22–23 batch without a year back. Many students have faced challenges beyond their control during that academic period.It would be more fair to assess the 22–23 batch with leniency due to academic disruptions and mental health challenges many faced during that time. A year back could severely affect students' careers and morale. Alternative academic solutions should be explored for the 22–23 batch.
This is to inform about the year back system for S4 and S6 students of ktu Please do favour for these students it will lead to moral and ethical issues and will probably affect their carrier...
Please remove year back system
Pls remove year back
Please consider promoting the 22–23 batch without a year back. Many students have faced challenges beyond their control during that academic period.It would be more fair to assess the 22–23 batch with leniency due to academic disruptions and mental health challenges many faced during that time. A year back could severely affect students' careers and morale. Alternative academic solutions should be explored for the 22–23 batch.
To The Honorable Vice-Chancellor, APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University (KTU), Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala. Subject: Request for reconsideration and exemption from the yearback system for affected students due to academic and administrative challenges. Respected Sir/Madam, We, the undersigned students of KTU, respectfully submit this petition to request a reconsideration of the yearback policy being enforced on certain batches. The implementation of this policy, under the current academic and practical circumstances, is unjust and harmful to the affected students’ academic careers and mental well-being. We wish to bring the following critical concerns to your kind attention: 1. COVID-19 Impact on Learning: The current S6 students belong to the batch that faced two consecutive academic years of online learning due to the COVID-19 pandemic. These students were deprived of proper in-person classes during their foundational semesters (S1–S4), leading to severe gaps in understanding key subjects. This has had a lasting impact on their academic performance. 2. Yearback Implementation Confusion for S4 Students: In the case of S4 students, if the yearback rule is strictly implemented, they will face a situation where they may be shifted to a new academic scheme (possibly the 2024 scheme). This shift is highly disruptive, as it will force students to adapt to an entirely different curriculum midway through their education, which is neither practical nor fair. 3. Unfair Discrepancy with the 2019 Batch: The 2019 admission batch, despite facing similar or lesser academic difficulties, was not subjected to the yearback policy. Applying it now to current students, who dealt with more intense disruptions due to the pandemic, shows inconsistency in the university’s decisions and creates a sense of injustice. 4. Lack of Clear Official Circular on Yearback: The university has not issued a comprehensive and transparent circular regarding the implementation
Please consider promoting the 22–23 batch without a year back. Many students have faced challenges beyond their control during that academic period.It would be more fair to assess the 22–23 batch with leniency due to academic disruptions and mental health challenges many faced during that time. A year back could severely affect students' careers and morale. Alternative academic solutions should be explored for the 22–23 batch.
I'm against the year-back system
Maatanam
Please consider
Pls stop year back or i will sucide I can’t family my society and family we don’t get much in +2 and in last year back didn,t hence this his fair
This yearback system will ruin many students and their families future. Please remove this..
Please ktu
Against year back system in 2022 &2023 batch
I kindly requested to remove the year back on s4 2019 scheme
No year back for 2022 & 2023 batch
Please consider promoting the 22–23 batch without a year back. Many students have faced challenges beyond their control during that academic period.It would be more fair to assess the 22–23 batch with leniency due to academic disruptions and mental health challenges many faced during that time. A year back could severely affect students' careers and morale. Alternative academic solutions should be explored for the 22–23 batch.
Year back
Please consider promoting the 22–23 batch without a year back. Many students have faced challenges beyond their control during that academic period.It would be more fair to assess the 22–23 batch with leniency due to academic disruptions and mental health challenges many faced during that time. A year back could severely affect students' careers and morale. Alternative academic solutions should be explored for the 22–23 batch.