Protect Homeowners from Redundant ARU inspection in Milton, ON
118 Comments
A
Atif Saeed
10 months ago
It’s extra financial impact on residents
R
Rida Zehra
10 months ago
RIids
A
Anonymous
10 months ago
I agree with the petition.
K
Kashif Zia
10 months ago
Not allowed for such inspection for basement - city should have done this while construction was being made and they approved that layout
T
Tanveer Ahmed Bhatti
10 months ago
Unfair ARU.
M
Muhammad Zafar
10 months ago
Unfair for those who recently passed the rigours inspection and asked to do it again. Totally unfair.
U
Umar Afzal
10 months ago
I request town of Milton to close this ARU inspections and fees.
W
Wajahat Khan
10 months ago
Remove all landlord who already have legal basement.
K
Khurshid Khan
10 months ago
I agree with this petition
M
MUHAMMAD RIZWAN MIAN
10 months ago
We can debate the merits of ARU if it helps or hinders the housing crisis in Canada. But it certainly leaves a pungent odor/taste for already legally permitted unit holders, especially at additional expense. Adding to the misery, I see annual check ups in the ARU by-law... ouch! Any law is usually not enforced retrospectively.
In good faith, I assume the City wants:
1. safe and affordable housing for everyone
2. to play a role in solving housing crisis
3. to help homeowners with the towering housing costs in the face of climbing unemployment and inflation.
Here are some suggestions
1. Only re-consider ARU on the new construction.
2. Have lenient terms on the additional units on the primary residence.
3. Allow overnight parking on the street in non-snowy season.
4. Relax bylaws on the front driveway construction.
5. Offer free-of-charge ARU inspection and make them optional for existing units.
6. Participate in the Federal Government's Making it easier for homeowners to build secondary suites - Canada.ca program.
In conclusion, I'm unhappy about the ARU imposition on existing legal units.
M
MUHAMMAD RIZWAN MIAN
10 months ago
We can debate the merits of ARU if it helps or hinders the housing crisis in Canada. But it certainly leaves a pungent odor/taste for already legally permitted unit holders, especially at additional expense. Adding to the misery, I see annual check ups in the ARU by-law... ouch! Any law is usually not enforced retrospectively.
In good faith, I assume the City wants:
1. safe and affordable housing for everyone
2. to play a role in solving housing crisis
3. to help homeowners with the towering housing costs in the face of climbing unemployment and inflation.
Here are some suggestions
1. Only re-consider ARU on the new construction.
2. Have lenient terms on the additional units on the primary residence.
3. Allow overnight parking on the street in non-snowy season.
4. Relax bylaws on the front driveway construction.
5. Offer free-of-charge ARU inspection and make them optional for existing units.
6. Participate in the Federal Government's Making it easier for homeowners to build secondary suites - Canada.ca program.
In conclusion, I'm unhappy about the ARU imposition on existing legal units.
H
HARIS ANWAR
10 months ago
I fully endorse this petition
M
Muhammad Shakil Omer
10 months ago
Great work.
A
Ashir
10 months ago
Building permit process must be amended rather then billing home owners for an additional aru inspection.
F
Farhan Khawaja
10 months ago
An absolutely unjustified action by the Town. It's a shame that the Councilors, who otherwise claim to be peoples representatives, unanimously approved it.
For them - we will see each other in the next election for sure.
For Doug Ford - this is what 'cash grab' by a municipality looks like.
I
Imran Ansari
10 months ago
Featured
Town should not burden unnecessary inspections for the units already checked and inspected as part of building legal ARUs. Infact they should more effort to inspect illegal ARUs which is a real safety hazard for the community.
S
Shahida Aleem
10 months ago
I endorse the petition.
A
Alka Bhatia
10 months ago
Unfair action by management
P
Parita Modi
10 months ago
ARU inspection is not justified
S
Syed Najam Hassan
10 months ago
Please join ARU group which is already active in Milton. So we can fight from same platform.
It’s extra financial impact on residents
RIids
I agree with the petition.
Not allowed for such inspection for basement - city should have done this while construction was being made and they approved that layout
Unfair ARU.
Unfair for those who recently passed the rigours inspection and asked to do it again. Totally unfair.
I request town of Milton to close this ARU inspections and fees.
Remove all landlord who already have legal basement.
I agree with this petition
We can debate the merits of ARU if it helps or hinders the housing crisis in Canada. But it certainly leaves a pungent odor/taste for already legally permitted unit holders, especially at additional expense. Adding to the misery, I see annual check ups in the ARU by-law... ouch! Any law is usually not enforced retrospectively. In good faith, I assume the City wants: 1. safe and affordable housing for everyone 2. to play a role in solving housing crisis 3. to help homeowners with the towering housing costs in the face of climbing unemployment and inflation. Here are some suggestions 1. Only re-consider ARU on the new construction. 2. Have lenient terms on the additional units on the primary residence. 3. Allow overnight parking on the street in non-snowy season. 4. Relax bylaws on the front driveway construction. 5. Offer free-of-charge ARU inspection and make them optional for existing units. 6. Participate in the Federal Government's Making it easier for homeowners to build secondary suites - Canada.ca program. In conclusion, I'm unhappy about the ARU imposition on existing legal units.
We can debate the merits of ARU if it helps or hinders the housing crisis in Canada. But it certainly leaves a pungent odor/taste for already legally permitted unit holders, especially at additional expense. Adding to the misery, I see annual check ups in the ARU by-law... ouch! Any law is usually not enforced retrospectively. In good faith, I assume the City wants: 1. safe and affordable housing for everyone 2. to play a role in solving housing crisis 3. to help homeowners with the towering housing costs in the face of climbing unemployment and inflation. Here are some suggestions 1. Only re-consider ARU on the new construction. 2. Have lenient terms on the additional units on the primary residence. 3. Allow overnight parking on the street in non-snowy season. 4. Relax bylaws on the front driveway construction. 5. Offer free-of-charge ARU inspection and make them optional for existing units. 6. Participate in the Federal Government's Making it easier for homeowners to build secondary suites - Canada.ca program. In conclusion, I'm unhappy about the ARU imposition on existing legal units.
I fully endorse this petition
Great work.
Building permit process must be amended rather then billing home owners for an additional aru inspection.
An absolutely unjustified action by the Town. It's a shame that the Councilors, who otherwise claim to be peoples representatives, unanimously approved it. For them - we will see each other in the next election for sure. For Doug Ford - this is what 'cash grab' by a municipality looks like.
Town should not burden unnecessary inspections for the units already checked and inspected as part of building legal ARUs. Infact they should more effort to inspect illegal ARUs which is a real safety hazard for the community.
I endorse the petition.
Unfair action by management
ARU inspection is not justified
Please join ARU group which is already active in Milton. So we can fight from same platform.