i think it would be more profession if these jobs is done ba pharmacists
P
Pauziah Harun
10 years ago
No comment
L
Lim Chin How
10 years ago
this amendment does not make sense at all, it is putting patient life at risk. malaysia is going backwards, no prescription and no indication/diagnosis on script seriously?
M
Monica Yam
10 years ago
Medication safety & patients/consumers right should NOT be ignored at all cost.
M
MOHD NAIM ISMAIL
10 years ago
Pl b fair & look at consumer interest.
T
Thum Ting Fatt
10 years ago
Please understand the negative consequences!
Y
Yeong chee peng
10 years ago
It Rule out the patient's life in danger. Medicine is not a thing to try an error
P
Pau suk hwa
10 years ago
Tats the role of pharmacist! Double checking and last defence line to make sure that patient received the correct and safe medications. This new RUUF doesn't think of patient care at all!
K
Khoo Sui Ping
10 years ago
Let us decide with the intention to progress forward in mind
P
POH YI WEN
10 years ago
Patients rights should always be protected
F
Fatin Rodhi
10 years ago
There are highly more cons rather than pros by implementation of this RUUF. The government should really really understand the role of pharmacist. People's LIVES could be at HIGH STAKE. So, please reconsider the decision.
A
Asrul Akmal Shafie
10 years ago
Legislation should protect the people, not making them more vulnerable. We should not create loopholes just so that some parties can profit at the benefit of people safety.
L
lim siok shan
10 years ago
Think before do any decision.
H
Hong ming yen
10 years ago
Being a pharmacist, if government could not appreciate our role and implement the RUFF, then the complication will be very impactful
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
I'm a Pharmacy student
E
ERNI BINTI MUIS
10 years ago
Protect consumers should be the main thing highlighted &RUUF is not supporting it
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
I'm pharmacy student
S
safiahtul laini shabry
10 years ago
its not a good change when ruuf wanted to do such that thing.
it could cause a lot of complicarions later on.
N
Nurul Izzah
10 years ago
This is ridiculous! Compounding by non pharmacists? That's even absurd!! You want the patient to die just because of LAW?
I will not accept this...
i think it would be more profession if these jobs is done ba pharmacists
No comment
this amendment does not make sense at all, it is putting patient life at risk. malaysia is going backwards, no prescription and no indication/diagnosis on script seriously?
Medication safety & patients/consumers right should NOT be ignored at all cost.
Pl b fair & look at consumer interest.
Please understand the negative consequences!
It Rule out the patient's life in danger. Medicine is not a thing to try an error
Tats the role of pharmacist! Double checking and last defence line to make sure that patient received the correct and safe medications. This new RUUF doesn't think of patient care at all!
Let us decide with the intention to progress forward in mind
Patients rights should always be protected
There are highly more cons rather than pros by implementation of this RUUF. The government should really really understand the role of pharmacist. People's LIVES could be at HIGH STAKE. So, please reconsider the decision.
Legislation should protect the people, not making them more vulnerable. We should not create loopholes just so that some parties can profit at the benefit of people safety.
Think before do any decision.
Being a pharmacist, if government could not appreciate our role and implement the RUFF, then the complication will be very impactful
I'm a Pharmacy student
Protect consumers should be the main thing highlighted &RUUF is not supporting it
I'm pharmacy student
its not a good change when ruuf wanted to do such that thing. it could cause a lot of complicarions later on.
This is ridiculous! Compounding by non pharmacists? That's even absurd!! You want the patient to die just because of LAW?